Next-generation sequencing for preimplantation genetic testing of blastocysts aneuploidies in women of different ages Healthy baby born to a robertsonian translocation carrier following next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis : a case report

Most of the current preimplantation genetic screening of aneuploidies tests are based on the low quality and low density comparative genomic hybridization arrays. The results are based on fewer than 2,700 probes. Our main outcome was the association of aneuploidy rates and the women’s age. Between August–December 2013, 198 blastocysts from women (mean age 36.3+-4.6) undergoing in vitro fertilization underwent routine trophectoderm biopsy. NGS was performed on Ion Torrent PGM (Life Technologies). The results were analyzed in five age groups (<31, 31–35, 36–38, 39–40 and >40). 85 blastocysts were normal according to NGS results. The results in the investigated groups were (% of normal blastocyst in each group): <31 (41.9%), 31–35 (47.6%), 36–38 (47.8%), 39–40 (37.7%) and >40 (38.5%). Our study suggests that NGS Testing embryos prior to transfer could increase the pregnancy rate, decrease miscarriages and prevent multiple IVF cycles in a patient with a very high incidence of aneuploidy, and consequently a low or zero chance of achieving a pregnancy with her own oocytes [1, 2, 3].The first of these technologies, still in use today, is microscopic morphology analysis. However, there are numerous developmental abnormalities which do not affect embryo morphology [4, 5], and even at the blastocyst stage almost 50% of good morphology embryos can be aneuploid. A step forward was the introduction of the time-lapse system for continuous morphokinetics analysis. Although many results show progress in results obtained, it is accepted not because of the data accuracy but due to the noninvasiveness of the method. For that reason, more reliable, but invasive, diagnostic tests are in use; PGD is applicable for routine preimplantation genetic testing. It allows also for easy customization of the procedre for each individual patient making personalized diagnostics a reality.

[1]  M. Kunicki,et al.  Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is a strong predictor of live birth in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology. , 2014, Reproductive biology.

[2]  A. Handyside 24-chromosome copy number analysis: a comparison of available technologies. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[3]  D. Massalska,et al.  [Effectiveness of multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA) in prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidies]. , 2013, Ginekologia polska.

[4]  M. Kunicki,et al.  Use of ovarian reserve parameters for predicting live births in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. , 2013, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[5]  N. Treff,et al.  Next-generation sequencing for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[6]  C. Simón,et al.  The impact of next-generation sequencing technology on preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[7]  Ronit Machtinger,et al.  Morphological systems of human embryo assessment and clinical evidence. , 2013, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[8]  Gary S Collins,et al.  Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study , 2012, Molecular Cytogenetics.

[9]  D. Wells,et al.  The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality, and embryo gender. , 2011, Fertility and sterility.

[10]  A. Clark,et al.  Aneuploidy and early human embryo development. , 2008, Human molecular genetics.

[11]  A. Mercader,et al.  Impact of chromosomal abnormalities on preimplantation embryo development , 2007, Prenatal diagnosis.

[12]  A. Kuliev,et al.  Frequency and distribution of chromosome abnormalities in human oocytes , 2005, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[13]  K. Lukaszuk,et al.  Optimization of estradiol supplementation during the luteal phase improves the pregnancy rate in women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles. , 2005, Fertility and sterility.

[14]  Luca Gianaroli,et al.  Pronuclear morphology and chromosomal abnormalities as scoring criteria for embryo selection. , 2003, Fertility and sterility.

[15]  M. Kunicki,et al.  Probability of live birth in women with extremely low anti-Müllerian hormone concentrations. , 2014, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[16]  A. Kuliev,et al.  Is there any predictive value of first polar body morphology for embryo genotype or developmental potential? , 2003, Reproductive biomedicine online.