Long-distance anticipatory vowel-to-vowel assimilatory effects in French and Japanese

This paper examines language-specific differences in anticipatory vowel-to-vowel coarticulation using two non-stress languages. Native speakers of Standard French (n=6) and Tokyo Japanese (n=5) served as subjects to a production study. To investigate possible long-distance effects between and beyond adjacent vowels, linguistic material consisting of /ba.bV/ and /ba.ba.bV/ was embedded within a carrier sentence in each language. The word-final trigger vowel (V) is /a/, /i/ or /u/. Acoustic analysis of continuous F1 and F2 trajectories as well as singlepoint formant measurements revealed opposite patterns in the two languages. Strong anticipatory effects in vowels up to 2 preceding syllables were observed in French. However, Japanese displayed few statistically significant anticipatory effects in any vowel preceding any trigger. We interpret the results as an indication that there are two rather different types of contextual phonetic variability. We also assert not all phonetic assimilatory effects in “coarticulation” are due to articulatory overlap.

[1]  John J. Ohala,et al.  Towards a universal, phonetically-based, theory of vowel harmony , 1994, ICSLP.

[2]  S. Manuel,et al.  The role of contrast in limiting vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in different languages. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  S. Ohman Coarticulation in VCV utterances: spectrographic measurements. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Anders Löfqvist Vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in Japanese: the effect of consonant duration. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat: doing phonetics by computer , 2003 .

[6]  D. Recasens,et al.  An articulatory investigation of lingual coarticulatory resistance and aggressiveness for consonants and vowels in Catalan. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  R. Krakow,et al.  Anticipatory velar lowering: a coproduction account. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[9]  Carole E. Gelfer,et al.  Determining the extent of coarticulation: effects of experimental design. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  K. Harris,et al.  A Temporal Model of Speech Production , 1981, Phonetica.

[11]  J S Perkell,et al.  Temporal measures of anticipatory labial coarticulation for the vowel/u/: within- and cross-subject variability. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  H. Magen The extent of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in English and Japanese , 1997 .

[13]  François Christophe Egidio Pellegrino,et al.  Across-Language Perspective on Speech Information Rate , 2011 .

[14]  E. Zwicker,et al.  Subdivision of the audible frequency range into critical bands , 1961 .

[15]  K. Munhall,et al.  Coarticulation: Theory, Data, and Techniques , 2001 .

[16]  C. Fowler,et al.  Coarticulation Resistance of American English Consonants and its Effects on Transconsonantal Vowel-to-Vowel Coarticulation , 2000 .

[17]  A. Benguerel,et al.  Coarticulation of Upper Lip Protrusion in French , 1974, Phonetica.

[18]  Noël Nguyen,et al.  Acoustic aspects of vowel harmony in French , 2008, J. Phonetics.