Effects of Absurdity in Advertising: The Moderating Role of Product Category Attitude and the Mediating Role of Cognitive Responses

Abstract For this paper, the presence or absence of an absurd image was manipulated in a simulated print advertisement for a fictitious brand of wine cooler. Consumers' prior attitude toward wine coolers was hypothesized to moderate the effectiveness of absurdity in advertising. Consumers' cognitive responses were hypothesized to mediate the impact of absurdity and prior product category attitude on consumers' persuasion as measured by consumers' attitude to the ad and brand. The results supported the moderating role of prior product category attitude and a distraction hypothesis explanation of this effect. For subjects with negative prior attitude toward wine coolers, those viewing the absurd ad had a more positive attitude to the ad and brand than those viewing the non-absurd ad. However, for subjects with positive prior attitude toward wine coolers, those viewing the absurd ad did not differ in their ad or brand attitude than those viewing the non-absurd ad. The results also supported the mediating role of cognitive responses of these effects. Finally, absurdity was found to impact brand name recall in a manner that paralleled the results for the persuasion measures.

[1]  Daniel C. Bello,et al.  The American Export Trading Company: Designing a New International Marketing Institution , 1985 .

[2]  Calvin P. Duncan,et al.  Effects of Humor in a Radio Advertising Experiment , 1985 .

[3]  W. D. Perreault,et al.  Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments , 1989 .

[4]  Amitava Chattopadhyay,et al.  Humor in Advertising: The Moderating Role of Prior Brand Evaluation: , 1990 .

[5]  Hans Richter,et al.  Dada: art and anti-art , 1967 .

[6]  F. W. Irwin.  Method and theory in experimental psychology. , 1954 .

[7]  Kathy A. Lutz,et al.  Effects of interactive imagery on learning: Application to advertising. , 1977 .

[8]  J. M. Kittross.  The measurement of meaning , 1959 .

[9]  L. Festinger,et al.  ON RESISTANCE TO PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATIONS. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[10]  Edward J. O'Brien,et al.  Effect of delay in testing on retention of plausible versus bizarre mental images. , 1982 .

[11]  P. Herr.  Priming Price: Prior Knowledge and Context Effects , 1989 .

[12]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Memory and Attentional Factors in Consumer Choice: Concepts and Research Methods , 1982 .

[13]  Paul Messaris,et al.  Visual Persuasion: The Role of Images in Advertising , 1996 .

[14]  Richard Staelin,et al.  The Information Processing of Pictures in Print Advertisements , 1983 .

[15]  Amitava Chattopadhyay,et al.  The Situational Importance of Recall and Inference in Consumer Decision Making , 1988 .

[16]  Amitava Chattopadhyay,et al.  Humor in Advertising: The Moderating Role of Prior Brand Evaluation , 1990 .

[17]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Product familiarity and learning new information , 1984 .

[18]  Barbara B. Stern,et al.  “Crafty Advertisers”: Literary versus Literal Deceptiveness , 1992 .

[19]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Confirmatory Versus Comparative Approaches to Judging Theory Tests , 1987 .

[20]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  Distraction Increases Yielding to Propaganda by Inhibiting Counterarguing. , 1970 .

[21]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  Distraction Can Enhance or Reduce Yielding to Propaganda: Thought Disruption Versus Effort Justification , 1976 .

[22]  Stewart W. Bither.  Effects of Distraction and Commitment on the Persuasiveness of Television Advertising , 1972 .

[23]  Christopher Leone,et al.  Cognitive schemas and thought as determinants of attitude change , 1977 .

[24]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Picture-Word Consistency and the Elaborative Processing of Advertisements: , 1987 .

[25]  M. Holbrook,et al.  Assessing the Role of Emotions as Mediators of Consumer Responses to Advertising , 1987 .

[26]  P. Homer.  Surrealism and advertising : a test of alternative explanations , 1986 .

[27]  P. Herr,et al.  On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects , 1983 .

[28]  M. Venkatesan,et al.  Resistance to persuasive communications: an examination of the distraction hypothesis. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  Larry Percy,et al.  Visual Imaging Ability As a Mediator of Advertising Response , 1978 .

[30]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  The Role of Expectancy and Relevancy in Memory for Verbal and Visual Information: What Is Incongruency? , 1992 .

[31]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[32]  Calvin P. Duncan,et al.  The Distraction Hypothesis and Radio Advertising , 1985 .

[33]  M. Sujan,et al.  Consumer Knowledge: Effects on Evaluation Strategies Mediating Consumer Judgments , 1985 .

[34]  John A. Quelch,et al.  Advertising and Promotion Management , 1987 .

[35]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Picture-Word Consistency and the Elaborative Processing of Advertisements , 1987 .

[37]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[38]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  Promotion Signal: Proxy for a Price Cut? , 1990 .

[39]  Christopher A. Thomas.  Theatre of the absurd. , 1978, The Hospital and health services review.