Surfgrass (Phyllospadix Torreyi) Reproduction: Reproductive Phenology, Resource Allocation, and Male Rarity

Little is known about the reproductive ecology of aquatic angiosperms, despite their wide distribution and ecological importance. Surfgrass (Phyllospadix torreyi) is a clonal marine angiosperm that lives on turbulent rocky shores. Surfgrass exhibits a strongly female-biased sex ratio in flowering shoots throughout its distribution along the Pacific coast of North America. The ecological causes for this biased sex ratio were examined over 3 yr in a surfgrass population off Catalina Island in southern California, USA. Abundances, biomass, and C :N content of male and female flowering ramets were measured, and the reproductive phenology, reproductive losses to abortions, herbivore damage to fruits and seeds, and clonal survival and growth were quantified. Each year, a quarter of the vegetative ramets reproduced sexually and seed production in the population was prolific. The population sex ratio was female biased across the entire depth distribution of surfgrass, but males were more abundant deeper in the bed. Despite male rarity, pollen was abundant in the population, and virtually all ovules were fertilized, with few losses to abortions or herbivory before seed release. Potential female fitness (seeds produced) was highest at shallow depths where light availability was greatest and abortions were reduced. The spatial segregation of the sexes was not due to environmental sex lability but to greater ramification of female vs. male clones in shallow depths. Female flowering shoots had significantly higher biomass than males across water depth, despite no obvious cost in terms of vegetative growth, or advantage in terms of plant size. If current theory on sex allocation that the sex ratio should be biased toward the gender with the lower reproductive cost is true for surfgrass, then surfgrass provides an example of how a subtle resource allocation difference can result in a dramatic population bias. An alternative explanation for the female bias in surfgrass populations is greater male mortality due to significantly weaker attachment to the substratum. This study demonstrates the potential role hydrodynamics can play in aquatic plant reproduction and in structuring their populations.

[1]  K. Gross,et al.  DIFFERENCES IN BIOMASS ALLOCATION TO REPRODUCTIVE AND VEGETATIVE STRUCTURES OF MALE AND FEMALE PLANTS OF A DIOECIOUS, PERENNIAL HERB, SILENE ALBA (MILLER) KRAUSE , 1981 .

[2]  F. R. Drysdale,et al.  Response of the marine angiosperm Phyllospadix torreyi to certain environmental variables: A preliminary study , 1975 .

[3]  M. Littler,et al.  Impact of sewage on the distribution, abundance and community structure of rocky intertidal macro-organisms , 1975 .

[4]  K. Moore,et al.  W&M ScholarWorks W&M ScholarWorks Seed Dispersal In A Marine Macrophyte - Implications For Seed Dispersal In A Marine Macrophyte - Implications For Colonization And Restoration Colonization And Restoration , 2019 .

[5]  Susan L. Williams,et al.  EFFECTS OF NITROGEN AVAILABILITY AND HERBIVORY ON EELGRASS (ZOSTERA MARINA) AND EPIPHYTES , 1993 .

[6]  R. C. Phillips,et al.  Phenology and reproductive physiology of Thalassia testudinium from the Western tropical Atlantic , 1981 .

[7]  E. Charnov The theory of sex allocation. , 1984, Monographs in population biology.

[8]  J. Lucas,et al.  Differences and similarities in the community roles of three rocky intertidal surfgrasses , 1985 .

[9]  A. Sakai,et al.  GROWTH IN MALE AND FEMALE ASPEN CLONES: A TWENTY-FIVE-YEAR LONGITUDINAL STUDY' , 1985 .

[10]  J. Kremer,et al.  Episodic nutrient supply to a Kelp forest ecosystem in Southern California , 1984 .

[11]  J. Stewart,et al.  MICROSPOROCYTE GROWTH AND MEIOSIS IN PHYLLOSPADIX TORREYI, A MARINE MONOCOTYLEDON , 1980 .

[12]  R. Lande,et al.  Viable Populations for Conservation: Effective population size, genetic variation, and their use in population management , 1987 .

[13]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  Sex, Size and Interyear Variation in Flowering Among Dioecious Trees of the Malayan Rain Forest , 1993 .

[14]  R. Cruden POLLEN‐OVULE RATIOS: A CONSERVATIVE INDICATOR OF BREEDING SYSTEMS IN FLOWERING PLANTS , 1977, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  J. Roughgarden,et al.  Recruitment dynamics in complex life cycles. , 1988, Science.

[16]  J. Kuo,et al.  Fruit anatomy, seed germination and seedling development in the Japanese seagrass Phyllospadix (Zosteraceae). , 1990 .

[17]  P. Cox Niche Partitioning between Sexes of Dioecious Plants , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[18]  Teresa Turner,et al.  Facilitation as a Successional Mechanism in a Rocky Intertidal Community , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[19]  Mark D. Moffler,et al.  Observations on the reproductive ecology of Thalassia testudinum (Hydrocharitaceae) II. Leaf width as a secondary sex character , 1985 .

[20]  J. L. Doust,et al.  Patterns of fruit and seed production. , 1988 .

[21]  J. Fisher,et al.  Influence of the seagrass, Zostera marina L., on current flow☆ , 1982 .

[22]  M. Dethier Disturbance and Recovery in Intertidal Pools: Maintenance of Mosaic Patterns , 1984 .

[23]  J. W. Popp,et al.  SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN BIOMASS ALLOCATION AND CLONAL GROWTH OF XANTHOXYLUM AMERICANUM , 1988 .

[24]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Gender‐Specific Physiology, Carbon Isotope Discrimination, and Habitat Distribution in Boxelder, Acer Negundo , 1993 .

[25]  J. Antos,et al.  Sex Ratio Variation in the Dioecious Shrub Oemleria cerasiformis , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[26]  Steven D. Gaines,et al.  The Dynamics of Juvenile Dispersal: Why Field Ecologists Must Integrate , 1993 .

[27]  S. Sutherland Floral Sex Ratios, Fruit‐Set, and Resource Allocation in Plants , 1986 .

[28]  N. Waser Sex ratio variation in populations of a dioecious desert perennial, Simmondsia chinensis , 1984 .

[29]  MC Gambi,et al.  Flume observations on flow dynamics in Zostera marina (eelgrass) beds , 1990 .

[30]  Mark F Shibata,et al.  Consequences of Surf-Zone Turbulence for Settlement and External Fertilization , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[31]  A. D. Cock Influence of light and dark on flowering in Zostera marina L. under laboratory conditions , 1981 .

[32]  D. Les Breeding Systems, Population Structure, and Evolution in Hydrophilous Angiosperms , 1988 .

[33]  J. Stewart Maintenance of a balanced, shifting boundary between the seagrass Phyllospadix and algal turf , 1989 .

[34]  W. Dennison Effects of light on seagrass photosynthesis, growth and depth distribution , 1987 .

[35]  W. Dennison,et al.  Sediment ammonium availability and eelgrass (Zostera marina) growth , 1987 .

[36]  J. E. Eckman The role of hydrodynamics in recruitment, growth, and survival of Argopecten irradians (L.) and Anomia simplex (D'Orbigny) within eelgrass meadows , 1987 .

[37]  M. Barbour,et al.  14C UPTAKE BY THE MARINE ANGIOSPERM PHYLLOSPADIX SCOULERP , 1979 .

[38]  F. Short The seagrass, Zostera Marina L.: Plant morphology and bed structure in relation to sediment ammonium in izembek lagoon, Alaska , 1983 .

[39]  Teresa Turner Stability of Rocky Intertidal Surfgrass Beds: Persistence, Preempton, and Recovery , 1985 .

[40]  D. Campbell,et al.  Resource and Pollen Limitations to Lifetime Seed Production in a Natural Plant Population , 1993 .

[41]  Mark D. Moffler,et al.  Observations on the reproductive ecology of Thalassia testudinum (Hydrocharitaceae). III. Spatial and temporal variations in reproductive patterns within a seagrass bed , 1985 .

[42]  C. Bennington,et al.  Use and Misuse of Mixed Model Analysis of Variance in Ecological Studies , 1994 .

[43]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1931 .

[44]  S. Sutherland PATTERNS OF FRUIT‐SET: WHAT CONTROLS FRUIT‐FLOWER RATIOS IN PLANTS? , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[45]  M. Willson,et al.  Plant reproductive ecology , 1983 .

[46]  S. H. Bullock,et al.  Episodic Flowering and Sexual Dimorphism in Guarea Rhopalocarpa in a Costa Rican Rain Forest , 1983 .

[47]  J. Thomson Selection for Outcrossing, Sexual Selection, and the Evolution of Dioecy in Plants , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[48]  R. C. Phillips,et al.  Phenology of eelgrass, Zostera marina L., along latitudinal gradients in North America , 1983 .

[49]  K. Bawa Evolution of Dioecy in Flowering Plants , 1980 .

[50]  Mark D. Moffler,et al.  Flowering of the seagrass Thalassia testudinum (Hydrocharitaceae) in the Tampa Bay, Florida area , 1978 .

[51]  V. Eckhart,et al.  Spatial Segregation of the Sexes of Dioecious Plants , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[52]  A. K. Irvine,et al.  FLOWERING, SEX RATIOS, POLLEN‐OVULE RATIOS, FRUIT SET, AND REPRODUCTIVE EFFORT OF A DIOECIOUS TREE, MYRISTICA INSIPIDA (MYRISTICACEAE), IN TWO DIFFERENT RAIN FOREST COMMUNITIES , 1989 .

[53]  A. Stephenson Flower and Fruit Abortion: Proximate Causes and Ultimate Functions , 1981 .

[54]  E. Charnov,et al.  Environmental Sex Determination with Overlapping Generations , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[55]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  A Model for the Evolution of Dioecy and Gynodioecy , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[56]  S. Barrett,et al.  Evolutionary processes in aquatic plant populations , 1993 .

[57]  B. Weir,et al.  Allozyme diversity in plant species. , 1990 .