DIPOLE THEORY IN ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY.

Abstract The equivalent cardiac generator consists of fictitious sources in an appropriate volume conductor which simulate all surface electrocardiograms on a given subject. It is convenient to consider the equivalent generator concept since it is not possible to determine the actual internal sources from surface measurements. Theory and research have been dominated by the idea of using the dipole as an equivalent source. The dipole, for example, forms the basis of vectorcardiography. Evidence gathered to date indicates that the dipole is inadequate on physical grounds, if not current clinical ones. Alternative approaches include the use of a multiple dipole source or a multipole source. The multipole source is appealing because of the evidence that the dipole approximation is less adequate for persons with known heart disease than it is for normal individuals.

[1]  F. N. Wilson The distribution of the potential differences produced by the heart beat within the body and at its surface , 1930 .

[2]  E FRANK Absolute Quantitative Comparison of Instantaneous QRS Equipotentials on a Normal Subject with Dipole Potentials on a Homogeneous Torso Model , 1955, Circulation research.

[3]  E SIMONSON,et al.  Electrocardiographic mirror pattern studies. I. Experimental validity tests of the dipole hypothesis and of the central terminal theory. , 1953, American heart journal.

[4]  J. Martinek,et al.  Multipole representations of current generators in a volume conductor , 1958 .

[5]  H. Gelernter,et al.  A MATHEMATICAL-PHYSICAL MODEL OF THE GENESIS OF THE ELECTROCARDIOGRAM. , 1964, Biophysical journal.

[6]  P. Langner,et al.  Synthesis of Precordial Potentials from the SVEC III Vectorcardiographic System , 1959, Circulation research.

[7]  F. N. Wilson,et al.  On Einthoven's triangle, the theory of unipolar electrocardiographic leads, and the interpretation of the precordial electrocardiogram. , 1946, American heart journal.

[8]  John W. Evans,et al.  A Theoretical Basis for Determining Heart-Lead Relationships of the Equivalent Cardiac Multipole , 1961 .

[9]  F. N. Wilson,et al.  The distribution of the currents of action and of injury displayed by heart muscle and other excitable tissues , 1933 .

[10]  H V PIPBERGER,et al.  Correlation of clinical information in the standard 12-lead ECG and in a corrected orthogonal 3-lead ECG. , 1961, American heart journal.

[11]  C. V. Nelson,et al.  Determination of the Resultant Dipole of the Heart from Measurements on the Body Surface , 1954 .

[12]  The potential distribution on the body surface caused by a heart vector; calculations on some simple models. , 1954, American heart journal.

[13]  G C YEH,et al.  THE POTENTIAL OF A GENERAL DIPOLE IN A HOMOGENEOUS CONDUCTING PROLATE SPHEROID , 1957, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[14]  O. H. Schmitt,et al.  Electrocardiographic mirror pattern studies. III , 1953 .

[15]  O. H. Schmitt,et al.  Electrocardiographic mirror pattern studies. II. The statistical and individual validity of the heart dipole concept as applied in electrocardiographic analysis. , 1953, American heart journal.

[16]  R. Okada Potentials Produced by an Eccentric Current Dipole in a Finite-Length Circular Conducting Cylinder , 1956 .

[17]  O. H. Schmitt LEAD VECTORS AND TRANSFER IMPEDANCE , 1957, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[18]  B. Taccardi,et al.  Distribution of Heart Potentials on the Thoracic Surface of Normal Human Subjects , 1963, Circulation research.

[19]  E. Frank,et al.  A comparative analysis of the eccentric double-layer representation of the human heart. , 1953, American heart journal.

[20]  H. C. Burger,et al.  HEART-VECTOR AND LEADS. , 1948, British heart journal.

[21]  F. N. Wilson,et al.  The substitution of a tetrahedron for the Einthoven triangle. , 1947, American heart journal.

[22]  E. Frank,et al.  SPREAD OF CURRENT IN VOLUME CONDUCTORS OF FINITE EXTENT , 1957, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[23]  E. Frank Electric Potential Produced by Two Point Current Sources in a Homogeneous Conducting Sphere , 1952 .

[24]  E. Frank,et al.  Frontal Plane Studies of Homogeneous Torso Models , 1954, Circulation.

[25]  E. Frank Determination of the electrical center of ventricular depolarization in the human heart. , 1955, American heart journal.

[26]  A. Waller On the Electromotive Changes Connected with the Beat of the Mammalian Heart, and of the Human Heart in Particular , 1889 .

[27]  A. C. Young,et al.  Factor Analysis of the Electrocardiogram: Test of Electrocardiographic Theory Normal Hearts , 1960, Circulation research.

[28]  D. B. Geselowitz,et al.  Multipole Representation for an Equivalent Cardiac Generator , 1960, Proceedings of the IRE.

[29]  H. C. Burger,et al.  HEART-VECTOR AND LEADS. Part II , 1947, British heart journal.

[30]  H. C. Burger,et al.  LEAD VECTOR PROJECTIONS. I. , 1957, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[31]  R. Pruitt,et al.  The immediate electrocardiographic effects of circumscribed myocardial injuries; an experimental study. , 1948, American heart journal.

[32]  D. Brody,et al.  The approximate determination of lead vectors and the Burger triangle in normal human subjects. , 1956, American heart journal.

[33]  F. N. Wilson,et al.  The Electric Field of an Eccentric Dipole in a Homogeneous Spherical Conducting Medium , 1950, Circulation.

[34]  H. C. Burger,et al.  HEART-VECTOR AND LEADS. , 1948, British heart journal.

[35]  R. Okada An experimental study of multiple dipole potentials and the effects of inhomogeneities in volume conductors. , 1957, American heart journal.