Space, color, and direction of movement: how do they affect attention?

Paying attention improves performance, but is this improvement regardless of what we attend to? We explored the differences in performance between attending to a location and attending to a feature when perceiving global motion. Attention was first cued to one of four locations that had coherently moving dots, while the remaining three had randomly moving distracter dots. Participants then viewed a colored display, wherein the color of the coherently moving dots was cued instead of location. In the third task, participants identified the location that had a particular cued direction of motion. Most observers reported reductions of motion threshold in all three tasks compared to when no cue was provided. However, the attentional bias generated by location cues was significantly larger than the bias resulting from feature cues of direction or color. This effect is consistent with the idea that attention is largely controlled by a fronto-parietal network where spatial relations are preferentially processed. On the other hand, color could not be used as a cue to focus attention and integrate motion. This finding suggests that color relies heavily on processing by ventral temporal cortical areas, which may have little control over the global motion areas in the dorsal part of the brain.

[1]  B. C. Motter,et al.  Neural correlates of feature selective memory and pop-out in extrastriate area V4 , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  E. Van der Burg,et al.  The role of spatial and nonspatial information in visual selection. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Alex L. White,et al.  Feature-based attention involuntarily and simultaneously improves visual performance across locations. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[4]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0: The Upgrade , 1993 .

[5]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Cuing the dimension of a distractor: Verbal cues of target identity also benefit same-dimension distractor singletons , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  W. Newsome,et al.  A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT) , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  Hyung-Chul O. Li,et al.  Segregation by color/luminance does not necessarily facilitate motion discrimination in the presence of motion distractors , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global feature-based attention for motion and color , 2003, Vision Research.

[9]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[10]  C. Tyler,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold , 1999, Vision Research.

[11]  D. Somers,et al.  Multiple Spotlights of Attentional Selection in Human Visual Cortex , 2004, Neuron.

[12]  Trichur Raman Vidyasagar A neuronal model of attentional spotlight: parietal guiding the temporal , 1999, Brain Research Reviews.

[13]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  A new neural framework for visuospatial processing , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[14]  John L Barbur,et al.  'Double-blindsight' revealed through the processing of color and luminance contrast defined motion signals. , 2004, Progress in brain research.

[15]  Robert J. Snowden,et al.  Colour and polarity contributions to global motion perception , 1999, Vision Research.

[16]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention enhances contrast sensitivity at cued and impairs it at uncued locations , 2005, Vision Research.

[17]  J. Bullier Integrated model of visual processing , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[18]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Visual Attention : How Top-Down Feedback Highlights Relevant Locations , 2007 .

[20]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Feature-based attentional integration of color and visual motion. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[21]  Søren K. Andersen,et al.  Effects of Feature-selective and Spatial Attention at Different Stages of Visual Processing , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  P. King-Smith,et al.  Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: Theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation , 1994, Vision Research.

[23]  J. Bisley The neural basis of visual attention , 2011, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Neuronal Activity in the Lateral Intraparietal Area and Spatial Attention , 2003, Science.

[25]  John Duncan,et al.  A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex , 1993, Nature.

[26]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Precuing benefits for color and location in a visual search task , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.