Targeting of bivalent anti-ErbB2 diabody antibody fragments to tumor cells is independent of the intrinsic antibody affinity.

In immunodeficient mice antitumor single-chain Fv (scFv) molecules penetrate tumors rapidly and have rapid serum clearance, leading to excellent tumor:normal organ ratios. However, the absolute quantity of scFv retained in the tumor is low due to rapid serum clearance and monovalent scFv binding. We previously demonstrated that the presence of an additional binding site prolongs in vitro and in vivo association of scFv-based molecules with tumor cells expressing relevant antigen. The contribution of the intrinsic affinity of each component scFv to the association between a dimeric scFv and its target antigen is largely unknown. Here, we have constructed bivalent diabody molecules from three affinity mutants of the human anti-ErbB2 (HER2/neu) scFv molecule C6.5 by shortening the peptide linker between the heavy (VH) and light (VL) chains variable domains from 15 to 5 amino acids. The shorter linker prevents intramolecular pairing of VH and VL, resulting in intermolecular pairing and creation of a dimeric Mr 50,000 molecule with two antigen-binding sites. The scFv used to create the diabodies span a 133-fold range of affinity for the same epitope of ErbB2 [133 nM (C6G98A), 25 nM (C6.5), and 1 nM (C6ML3-9)] and differ by only one to three amino acids. Diabody binding kinetics were determined by surface plasmon resonance on the immobilized ErbB2 extracellular domain. The association rate constants obtained for each diabody molecule were similar to that of the parental (component) scFv. However, the dissociation rate constants obtained for the bivalent diabodies were up to 15-fold slower. The magnitude of the decrease in the bivalent dissociation rate constant was inversely proportional to the monovalent interaction, ranging from only 3-fold for that of the C6ML3-9 diabody to 15-fold for the C6G98A diabody. This resulted in only a 22-fold difference in bivalent affinity, compared with a 133-fold difference in affinity for the respective scFv. Equilibrium-binding constants obtained by surface plasmon resonance correlated well with the equilibrium-binding constants determined in vitro on ErbB2 overexpressing cells. Biodistribution studies were performed in scid mice bearing established SKOV3 tumors. At 24 h, 3-37-fold more diabody was retained in tumor compared with the parental scFv monomers. This likely results from a higher apparent affinity, because of bivalent binding, and a slower serum clearance. Surprisingly, the differences in affinity between diabodies did not result in differences in quantitative tumor retention or tumor to blood ratios. In fact, the diabody constructed from the lowest affinity scFv exhibited the best tumor-targeting properties. We conclude that, above a threshold affinity, other factors regulate quantitative tumor retention. In addition, straightforward dimerization of a low-affinity scFv leads to significantly greater tumor localization than does exhaustive scFv affinity maturation.

[1]  G. Adams,et al.  High affinity restricts the localization and tumor penetration of single-chain fv antibody molecules. , 2001, Cancer research.

[2]  U. Nielsen,et al.  Expression of single-chain Fv-Fc fusions in Pichia pastoris. , 2001, Journal of immunological methods.

[3]  G W Beresford,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of engineered single-chain antibody constructs of MAb CC49 in colon carcinoma xenografts. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  L. Zardi,et al.  Increased binding affinity and valence of recombinant antibody fragments lead to improved targeting of tumoral angiogenesis. , 1999, Cancer research.

[5]  S. Batra,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of genetically engineered antibodies. , 2002, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[6]  G. Adams,et al.  Prolonged in vivo tumour retention of a human diabody targeting the extracellular domain of human HER2/neu. , 1998, British Journal of Cancer.

[7]  G. Adams,et al.  Increased affinity leads to improved selective tumor delivery of single-chain Fv antibodies. , 1998, Cancer research.

[8]  W. Anderson,et al.  Determination of the binding affinity of an anti-CD34 single-chain antibody using a novel, flow cytometry based assay. , 1997, Journal of immunological methods.

[9]  G. Adams,et al.  Isolation of picomolar affinity anti-c-erbB-2 single-chain Fv by molecular evolution of the complementarity determining regions in the center of the antibody binding site. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  R. Hawkins,et al.  Clinical evidence of efficient tumor targetting based on single–chain Fv antibody selected from a combinatorial library , 1996, Nature Medicine.

[11]  L E Williams,et al.  Minibody: A novel engineered anti-carcinoembryonic antigen antibody fragment (single-chain Fv-CH3) which exhibits rapid, high-level targeting of xenografts. , 1996, Cancer research.

[12]  P B Laub,et al.  NCOMP--a windows-based computer program for noncompartmental analysis of pharmacokinetic data. , 1996, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[13]  L E Williams,et al.  Tumor localization of anti-CEA single-chain Fvs: improved targeting by non-covalent dimers. , 1996, Immunotechnology : an international journal of immunological engineering.

[14]  J. Huston,et al.  In vitro and in vivo characterization of a human anti-c-erbB-2 single-chain Fv isolated from a filamentous phage antibody library. , 1995, Immunotechnology : an international journal of immunological engineering.

[15]  R. Williams,et al.  Crystal structure of a diabody, a bivalent antibody fragment. , 1994, Structure.

[16]  M. Whitlow,et al.  Multivalent Fvs: characterization of single-chain Fv oligomers and preparation of a bispecific Fv. , 1994, Protein engineering.

[17]  K. Lamborn,et al.  The biologic window for chimeric l6 radioimmunotherapy , 1994, Cancer.

[18]  L L Houston,et al.  Highly specific in vivo tumor targeting by monovalent and divalent forms of 741F8 anti-c-erbB-2 single-chain Fv. , 1993, Cancer research.

[19]  T Prospero,et al.  "Diabodies": small bivalent and bispecific antibody fragments. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  R K Jain,et al.  Effect of bivalent interaction upon apparent antibody affinity: experimental confirmation of theory using fluorescence photobleaching and implications for antibody binding assays. , 1992, Cancer research.

[21]  T. Yokota,et al.  Rapid tumor penetration of a single-chain Fv and comparison with other immunoglobulin forms. , 1992, Cancer research.

[22]  A. Plückthun,et al.  Miniantibodies: use of amphipathic helices to produce functional, flexibly linked dimeric FV fragments with high avidity in Escherichia coli. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[23]  T. Yokota,et al.  Construction, binding properties, metabolism, and tumor targeting of a single-chain Fv derived from the pancarcinoma monoclonal antibody CC49. , 1991, Cancer research.

[24]  K. D. Hardman,et al.  In vivo tumor targeting of a recombinant single-chain antigen-binding protein. , 1990, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[25]  R K Jain,et al.  Physiological barriers to delivery of monoclonal antibodies and other macromolecules in tumors. , 1990, Cancer research.

[26]  K. Fujimori,et al.  Modeling analysis of the global and microscopic distribution of immunoglobulin G, F(ab')2, and Fab in tumors. , 1989, Cancer research.

[27]  K. D. Hardman,et al.  Single-chain antigen-binding proteins. , 1988, Science.

[28]  R. Bruccoleri,et al.  Protein engineering of antibody binding sites: recovery of specific activity in an anti-digoxin single-chain Fv analogue produced in Escherichia coli. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  D M Crothers,et al.  The influence of polyvalency on the binding properties of antibodies. , 1972, Immunochemistry.