High-order expansion of the solution of preliminary orbit determination problem

A method for high-order treatment of uncertainties in preliminary orbit determination is presented. The observations consist in three couples of topocentric right ascensions and declinations at three observation epochs. The goal of preliminary orbit determination is to compute a trajectory that fits with the observations in two-body dynamics. The uncertainties of the observations are usually mapped to the phase space only when additional observations are available and a least squares fitting problem is set up. A method based on Taylor differential algebra for the analytical treatment of observation uncertainties is implemented. Taylor differential algebra allows for the efficient computation of the arbitrary order Taylor expansion of a sufficiently continuous multivariate function. This enables the mapping of the uncertainties from the observation space to the phase space as high-order multivariate Taylor polynomials. These maps can then be propagated forward in time to predict the observable set at successive epochs. This method can be suitably used to recover newly discovered objects when a scarce number of measurements is available. Simulated topocentric observations of asteroids on realistic orbits are used to assess the performances of the method.

[1]  R. H. Gooding,et al.  A new procedure for the solution of the classical problem of minimal orbit determination from three lines of sight , 1996 .

[2]  Giovanni F. Gronchi,et al.  Multiple solutions in preliminary orbit determination from three observations , 2009 .

[3]  Daniele Mortari,et al.  Initial orbit determination using multiple observations , 2011 .

[4]  A. Celletti,et al.  Dependence on the observational time intervals and domain of convergence of orbital determination methods , 2006 .

[5]  P. W. Hawkes,et al.  Modern map methods in particle beam physics , 1999 .

[6]  M. Tigner,et al.  Handbook of Accelerator Physics and Engineering , 2013 .

[7]  An Automatic Earth-Asteroid Collision Monitoring System , 2000 .

[8]  M. Lavagna,et al.  Gravity assist space pruning based on differential algebra , 2009 .

[9]  M. Kaplan.  Modern Spacecraft Dynamics and Control , 1976 .

[10]  M. Berz,et al.  Asteroid close encounters characterization using differential algebra: the case of Apophis , 2010 .

[11]  Martin Berz,et al.  The method of power series tracking for the mathematical description of beam dynamics , 1987 .

[12]  P. R. Escobal,et al.  Methods of orbit determination , 1976 .

[13]  Howard D. Curtis,et al.  Orbital Mechanics for Engineering Students , 2005 .

[14]  Daniel J. Scheeres,et al.  Nonlinear Semi-Analytic Methods for Trajectory Estimation , 2007 .

[15]  R. Park,et al.  Nonlinear Mapping of Gaussian Statistics: Theory and Applications to Spacecraft Trajectory Design , 2006 .

[16]  C. Gauss.  Theory of the Motion of the Heavenly Bodies Moving About the Sun in Conic Sections , 1957 .

[17]  S. Chesley,et al.  Asteroid Close Approaches: Analysis and Potential Impact Detection , 2002 .

[18]  David G. Kirkpatrick,et al.  On the shape of a set of points in the plane , 1983, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[19]  Karri Muinonen,et al.  Statistical Ranging of Asteroid Orbits , 2001 .

[20]  R. Battin.  An introduction to the mathematics and methods of astrodynamics , 1987 .

[21]  Berz Martin.  Differential Algebraic Techniques , 1999 .

[22]  A. Milani,et al.  Theory of Orbit Determination , 2009 .

[23]  S. Chesley,et al.  Asteroid close encounters with Earth: risk assessment , 2000 .