Mode of Subsistence and Folk Biological Taxonomy [and Comments and Reply]

There are significant differences between the folk biological taxonomy and nomenclature of hunter-gatherers and that of small-scale agriculturalists. While foragers possess sizable inventories of labeled plant and animal classes, small-scale farmers tend to have inventories that are considerably larger. Also, binomial names, such as English blue oak and shingle oak, are common in folk taxonomies of cultivators but rare in those of hunter-gatherers. An explanatory framework accounting for these findings is proposed which in part relates the larger taxonomies of farmers to (1) a diversity of ecotypes created by subsistence farming that supports a broadened range of wild organisms, (2) intensive utilization of wild plants and animals as "famine foods" when crops fail, and (3) the greater health risks of farmers, which motivate exceptional interest in organisms of medicinal value. The common occurrence of binomially labeled classes in taxonomies of agriculturalists is related to the lower salience of those taxa compared to the salience of classes labeled in taxonomies of foragers.

[1]  John B. Gatewood.  Loose Talk: Linguistic Competence and Recognition Ability , 1983 .

[2]  J. D. Dougherty.  West Futuna Aniwa: An Introduction to a Polynesian Outlier Language , 1984 .

[3]  AN ETHNOBOTANICALANOMALY: THE DEARTH OF BINOMIAL SPECIFICS IN A FOLK TAXONOMY OF A NEGRITO HUNTER-GATHERERSOCIETY IN THE PHILIPPINES , 1983 .

[4]  S. Tyler.  The said and the unsaid : mind, meaning, and culture , 1983 .

[5]  L. A. Reid,et al.  Some Comments on Bontoc Ethnobotany , 1972 .

[6]  R. Ellen,et al.  Nuaulu Settlement and Ecology: An Approach to the Environmental Relations of an Eastern Indonesian Community. , 1981 .

[7]  Cecil H. Brown,et al.  figurative language In a universalist perspective , 1981 .

[8]  Cecil H. Brown,et al.  Polysemy, Lexical Change and Cultural Importance , 1983 .

[9]  M. Cohen,et al.  Paleopathology at the Origins of Agriculture , 1984 .

[10]  R. W. Casson.  Schemata in Cognitive Anthropology , 1983 .

[11]  Janet W. D. Dougherty,et al.  Salience and relativity in classification , 1978 .

[12]  Cecil H. Brown.  Folk Zoological Life‐Forms: Their Universality and Growth , 1977 .

[13]  N. Turner,et al.  Ethnobotany of the Nitinaht Indians of Vancouver Island. , 1983 .

[14]  Whither the Savage Mind? Notes on the Natural Taxonomies of a Hunting and Gathering People , 1976 .

[15]  Cecil H. Brown,et al.  WHERE DO TREE TERMS COME FROM , 1981 .

[16]  E. Hunn.  toward a perceptual model of folk biological classification1 , 1976 .

[17]  N. Turner.  Plant taxonomic systems and ethnobotany of three contemporary Indian groups of the Pacific Northwest (Haida, Bella Coola, and Lillooet) , 1973 .

[18]  Confusions in the classifications: How the Wola name their plants , 1980 .

[19]  G. Palmer.  Shuswap indian ethnobotany , 1975 .

[20]  D. E. Breedlove,et al.  General Principles of Classification and Nomenclature in Folk Biology , 1973 .

[21]  Dennis E. Breedlove,et al.  Principles of Tzeltal Plant Classification , 1975 .

[22]  P. Taylor.  Tobelorese ethnobiology : the folk classification of "biotic forms" , 1980 .

[23]  Cecil H. Brown.  Language and living things: Uniformities in folk classification and naming , 1984 .

[24]  T. E. Hays.  Mauna: explorations in Ndumba ethnobotany , 1974 .

[25]  C. H. Brown.  Where Do Cardinal Direction Terms Come From , 1983 .

[26]  C. Larsen.  Skeletal and Dental Adaptations to the Shift to Agriculture on the Georgia Coast , 1981, Current Anthropology.