The reduction of gunshot noise and auditory risk through the use of firearm suppressors and low-velocity ammunition

Abstract Objective: This research assessed the reduction of peak levels, equivalent energy and sound power of firearm suppressors. Design: The first study evaluated the effect of three suppressors at four microphone positions around four firearms. The second study assessed the suppressor-related reduction of sound power with a 3 m hemispherical microphone array for two firearms. Results: The suppressors reduced exposures at the ear between 17 and 24 dB peak sound pressure level and reduced the 8 h equivalent A-weighted energy between 9 and 21 dB depending upon the firearm and ammunition. Noise reductions observed for the instructor’s position about a metre behind the shooter were between 20 and 28 dB peak sound pressure level and between 11 and 26 dB LAeq,8h. Firearm suppressors reduced the measured sound power levels between 2 and 23 dB. Sound power reductions were greater for the low-velocity ammunition than for the same firearms fired with high-velocity ammunition due to the effect of N-waves produced by a supersonic bullet. Conclusions: Firearm suppressors may reduce noise exposure, and the cumulative exposures of suppressed firearms can still present a significant hearing risk. Therefore, firearm users should always wear hearing protection whenever target shooting or hunting.

[1]  M. Lehman,et al.  Hearing loss and hearing handicap in users of recreational firearms. , 2002, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[2]  J. Ylikoski,et al.  Hearing loss and handicap of professional soldiers exposed to gunfire noise. , 1994, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[3]  G O Stevin Spectral analysis of impulse noise for hearing conservation purposes. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Deanna K Meinke,et al.  Shooting habits of youth recreational firearm users , 2014, International journal of audiology.

[5]  Mark Lehman,et al.  Shooting habits of U.S. waterfowl hunters. , 2009, Noise & health.

[6]  G. Atherley,et al.  Equivalent-continuous noise level as a measure of injury from impact and impulse noise. , 1971, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[7]  S. Tasko,et al.  Acoustic reflexes are common but not pervasive: evidence from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2012 , 2017, International journal of audiology.

[8]  Edward Lobarinas,et al.  Differential effects of suppressors on hazardous sound pressure levels generated by AR-15 rifles: Considerations for recreational shooters, law enforcement, and the military , 2016, International journal of audiology.

[9]  Roland Stoughton Measurements of small-caliber ballistic shock waves in air , 1997 .

[10]  Michael E. Stergar,et al.  Spectral analysis of hearing protector impulsive insertion loss , 2017, International journal of audiology.

[11]  P. Chan,et al.  An Interim LAeq8 Criterion for Impulse Noise Injury. , 2016, Military medicine.

[12]  J T Kalb,et al.  Insights into hazard from intense impulses from a mathematical model of the ear. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Per Rasmussen,et al.  Measuring recreational firearm noise. , 2009 .