Tracing and Visualizing Human-ML/AI Collaborative Processes through Artifacts of Data Work
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] K. Vrotsou,et al. A Model for Types and Levels of Automation in Visual Analytics: a Survey, a Taxonomy, and Examples , 2022, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[2] Nikolay O. Nikitin,et al. Automated Evolutionary Approach for the Design of Composite Machine Learning Pipelines , 2021, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..
[3] Duen Horng Chau,et al. A Survey of Human‐Centered Evaluations in Human‐Centered Machine Learning , 2021, Comput. Graph. Forum.
[4] Padhraic Smyth,et al. Automating data science , 2021, Commun. ACM.
[5] Praveen K. Paritosh,et al. “Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work”: Data Cascades in High-Stakes AI , 2021, CHI.
[6] Jeffrey M. Rzeszotarski,et al. Designing Interactive Transfer Learning Tools for ML Non-Experts , 2021, CHI.
[7] Allan Dafoe,et al. Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence: Evidence from a Survey of Machine Learning Researchers , 2021, J. Artif. Intell. Res..
[8] Elena García Barriocanal,et al. Traceability for Trustworthy AI: A Review of Models and Tools , 2021, Big Data Cogn. Comput..
[9] Justin D. Weisz,et al. Model LineUpper: Supporting Interactive Model Comparison at Multiple Levels for AutoML , 2021, IUI.
[10] Marius Lindauer,et al. Auto-Pytorch: Multi-Fidelity MetaLearning for Efficient and Robust AutoDL , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.
[11] Karrie Karahalios,et al. Deconstructing Categorization in Visualization Recommendation: A Taxonomy and Comparative Study , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[12] Erick Oduor,et al. AutoDS: Towards Human-Centered Automation of Data Science , 2021, CHI.
[13] Aditya G. Parameswaran,et al. Whither AutoML? Understanding the Role of Automation in Machine Learning Workflows , 2021, CHI.
[14] Anamaria Crisan,et al. Fits and Starts: Enterprise Use of AutoML and the Role of Humans in the Loop , 2021, CHI.
[15] Soya Park,et al. How Much Automation Does a Data Scientist Want? , 2021, ArXiv.
[16] Chen Chen,et al. VEGA: Towards an End-to-End Configurable AutoML Pipeline , 2020, ArXiv.
[17] Theresa-Marie Rhyne,et al. Challenges in Evaluating Interactive Visual Machine Learning Systems , 2020, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.
[18] Oshin Agarwal,et al. Large Scale Knowledge Graph Based Synthetic Corpus Generation for Knowledge-Enhanced Language Model Pre-training , 2020, ArXiv.
[19] Shubhra Kanti Karmaker Santu,et al. AutoML to Date and Beyond: Challenges and Opportunities , 2020, ACM Comput. Surv..
[20] Melanie Tory,et al. Passing the Data Baton : A Retrospective Analysis on Data Science Work and Workers , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[21] Tamara Munzner,et al. Table Scraps: An Actionable Framework for Multi-Table Data Wrangling From An Artifact Study of Computational Journalism , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[22] David Jonker,et al. Towards Evaluating Exploratory Model Building Process with AutoML Systems , 2020, ArXiv.
[23] Miriah Meyer,et al. Insights From Experiments With Rigor in an EvoBio Design Study , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[24] Habib Asseiss Neto,et al. NASirt: AutoML based learning with instance-level complexity information , 2020, ArXiv.
[25] K. Gadhave,et al. Trrack: A Library for Provenance-Tracking in Web-Based Visualizations , 2020, 2020 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS).
[26] Jeffrey Heer,et al. Boba: Authoring and Visualizing Multiverse Analyses , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[27] Marius Lindauer,et al. Auto-Sklearn 2.0: The Next Generation , 2020, ArXiv.
[28] Madeleine Udell,et al. AutoML Pipeline Selection: Efficiently Navigating the Combinatorial Space , 2020, KDD.
[29] W. Zame,et al. AutoCP: Automated Pipelines for Accurate Prediction Intervals , 2020 .
[30] J. Vanschoren,et al. Adaptation Strategies for Automated Machine Learning on Evolving Data , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.
[31] Juliana Freire,et al. PipelineProfiler: A Visual Analytics Tool for the Exploration of AutoML Pipelines , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[32] Sungsoo Ray Hong,et al. Human Factors in Model Interpretability: Industry Practices, Challenges, and Needs , 2020, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..
[33] Harmanpreet Kaur,et al. Interpreting Interpretability: Understanding Data Scientists' Use of Interpretability Tools for Machine Learning , 2020, CHI.
[34] Qian Yang,et al. Re-examining Whether, Why, and How Human-AI Interaction Is Uniquely Difficult to Design , 2020, CHI.
[35] Stefano Alletto,et al. RandomNet: Towards Fully Automatic Neural Architecture Design for Multimodal Learning , 2020, ArXiv.
[36] Amy X. Zhang,et al. How do Data Science Workers Collaborate? Roles, Workflows, and Tools , 2020, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..
[37] Justin D. Weisz,et al. Trust in AutoML: exploring information needs for establishing trust in automated machine learning systems , 2020, IUI.
[38] Alexander G. Gray,et al. AutoAIViz: opening the blackbox of automated artificial intelligence with conditional parallel coordinates , 2019, IUI.
[39] Hui Xiong,et al. A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learning , 2019, Proceedings of the IEEE.
[40] Steve Oney,et al. How Data Scientists Use Computational Notebooks for Real-Time Collaboration , 2019, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..
[41] Lior Rokach,et al. DeepLine: AutoML Tool for Pipelines Generation using Deep Reinforcement Learning and Hierarchical Actions Filtering , 2019, KDD.
[42] Tim Althoff,et al. Paths Explored, Paths Omitted, Paths Obscured: Decision Points & Selective Reporting in End-to-End Data Analysis , 2019, CHI.
[43] Octavio Loyola-González,et al. Black-Box vs. White-Box: Understanding Their Advantages and Weaknesses From a Practical Point of View , 2019, IEEE Access.
[44] Alejandro Barredo Arrieta,et al. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AI , 2019, Inf. Fusion.
[45] Marta Mattoso,et al. Provenance Data in the Machine Learning Lifecycle in Computational Science and Engineering , 2019, 2019 IEEE/ACM Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science (WORKS).
[46] Parikshit Ram,et al. Human-AI Collaboration in Data Science , 2019, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..
[47] Kaiyong Zhao,et al. AutoML: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art , 2019, Knowl. Based Syst..
[48] Mennatallah El-Assady,et al. explAIner: A Visual Analytics Framework for Interactive and Explainable Machine Learning , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[49] Alexander M. Rush,et al. Visual Interaction with Deep Learning Models through Collaborative Semantic Inference , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[50] Eric Horvitz,et al. Updates in Human-AI Teams: Understanding and Addressing the Performance/Compatibility Tradeoff , 2019, AAAI.
[51] Juliana Freire,et al. Visus: An Interactive System for Automatic Machine Learning Model Building and Curation , 2019, HILDA@SIGMOD.
[52] Andrés Montoyo,et al. AutoML Strategy Based on Grammatical Evolution: A Case Study about Knowledge Discovery from Text , 2019, ACL.
[53] Bernd Bischl,et al. An Open Source AutoML Benchmark , 2019, ArXiv.
[54] Sherif Sakr,et al. Automated Machine Learning: State-of-The-Art and Open Challenges , 2019, ArXiv.
[55] Leilani Battle,et al. Characterizing Exploratory Visual Analysis: A Literature Review and Evaluation of Analytic Provenance in Tableau , 2019, Comput. Graph. Forum.
[56] Paul N. Bennett,et al. Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction , 2019, CHI.
[57] Marco F. Huber,et al. Benchmark and Survey of Automated Machine Learning Frameworks , 2019, J. Artif. Intell. Res..
[58] Laura von Rueden,et al. Informed Machine Learning – A Taxonomy and Survey of Integrating Prior Knowledge into Learning Systems , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.
[59] Vidya Setlur,et al. Inferencing underspecified natural language utterances in visual analysis , 2019, IUI.
[60] Kalyan Veeramachaneni,et al. ATMSeer: Increasing Transparency and Controllability in Automated Machine Learning , 2019, CHI.
[61] Jeffrey Heer. Agency plus automation: Designing artificial intelligence into interactive systems , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[62] Dominik Dellermann,et al. The Future of Human-AI Collaboration: A Taxonomy of Design Knowledge for Hybrid Intelligence Systems , 2019, HICSS.
[63] D. Keim,et al. VIS4ML: An Ontology for Visual Analytics Assisted Machine Learning , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[64] Thomas Zichner,et al. KnowledgePearls: Provenance-Based Visualization Retrieval , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[65] Chris Russell,et al. Explaining Explanations in AI , 2018, FAT.
[66] Isabelle Guyon,et al. Taking Human out of Learning Applications: A Survey on Automated Machine Learning , 2018, 1810.13306.
[67] Marina Jirotka,et al. Ethical governance is essential to building trust in robotics and artificial intelligence systems , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[68] Inioluwa Deborah Raji,et al. Model Cards for Model Reporting , 2018, FAT.
[69] Tim Kraska,et al. VizML: A Machine Learning Approach to Visualization Recommendation , 2018, CHI.
[70] Dae Won Kim,et al. OBOE: Collaborative Filtering for AutoML Model Selection , 2018, KDD.
[71] Qingquan Song,et al. Auto-Keras: An Efficient Neural Architecture Search System , 2018, KDD.
[72] Joaquin Vanschoren,et al. ML-Schema: Exposing the Semantics of Machine Learning with Schemas and Ontologies , 2018, ICML 2018.
[73] Jake VanderPlas,et al. A Practical Taxonomy of Reproducibility for Machine Learning Research , 2018 .
[74] Aditya G. Parameswaran,et al. Accelerating Human-in-the-loop Machine Learning: Challenges and Opportunities , 2018, DEEM@SIGMOD.
[75] Neil Houlsby,et al. Transfer Learning with Neural AutoML , 2018, NeurIPS.
[76] Daniel A. Keim,et al. What you see is what you can change: Human-centered machine learning by interactive visualization , 2017, Neurocomputing.
[77] D. Sculley,et al. Google Vizier: A Service for Black-Box Optimization , 2017, KDD.
[78] Gina Neff,et al. Critique and Contribute: A Practice-Based Framework for Improving Critical Data Studies and Data Science , 2017, Big Data.
[79] Alex Endert,et al. The State of the Art in Integrating Machine Learning into Visual Analytics , 2017, Comput. Graph. Forum.
[80] Jun Zhu,et al. Towards better analysis of machine learning models: A visual analytics perspective , 2017, Vis. Informatics.
[81] Michael Burch,et al. A Taxonomy and Survey of Dynamic Graph Visualization , 2017, Comput. Graph. Forum.
[82] Quoc V. Le,et al. Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learning , 2016, ICLR.
[83] Stefania Mariano,et al. Artifacts in knowledge management research: a systematic literature review and future research directions , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..
[84] Bogdan Gabrys,et al. Adapting Multicomponent Predictive Systems using Hybrid Adaptation Strategies with Auto-WEKA in Process Industry , 2016, AutoML@ICML.
[85] Randal S. Olson,et al. Evaluation of a Tree-based Pipeline Optimization Tool for Automating Data Science , 2016, GECCO.
[86] Kanit Wongsuphasawat,et al. Voyager: Exploratory Analysis via Faceted Browsing of Visualization Recommendations , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[87] Alex Endert,et al. Characterizing Provenance in Visualization and Data Analysis: An Organizational Framework of Provenance Types and Purposes , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[88] Jacky Akoka,et al. A Taxonomy of Evaluation Methods for Information Systems Artifacts , 2015, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[89] James Mussell. Raw Data is an Oxymoron , 2014 .
[90] Pieter Jan Stappers,et al. Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning , 2014 .
[91] T. Munzner,et al. A Multi-Level Typology of Abstract Visualization Tasks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[92] Mark Frank,et al. 'There's no such thing as raw data': exploring the socio-technical life of a government dataset , 2013, WebSci.
[93] Jan Muntermann,et al. A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[94] Carla E. Brodley,et al. Dis-function: Learning distance functions interactively , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST).
[95] Kevin Leyton-Brown,et al. Auto-WEKA: combined selection and hyperparameter optimization of classification algorithms , 2012, KDD.
[96] Chris North,et al. Semantic interaction for visual text analytics , 2012, CHI.
[97] Jason Dykes,et al. Human-Centered Approaches in Geovisualization Design: Investigating Multiple Methods Through a Long-Term Case Study , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[98] Jonathan C. Roberts,et al. Visual comparison for information visualization , 2011, Inf. Vis..
[99] Qiang Yang,et al. A Survey on Transfer Learning , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.
[100] Jane Huffman Hayes,et al. Assessing traceability of software engineering artifacts , 2010, Requirements Engineering.
[101] William Buxton,et al. Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time) , 2008, CHI.
[102] Charlotte P. Lee,et al. Boundary Negotiating Artifacts: Unbinding the Routine of Boundary Objects and Embracing Chaos in Collaborative Work , 2007, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).
[103] Eliane Regina de Almeida Valiati,et al. A taxonomy of tasks for guiding the evaluation of multidimensional visualizations , 2006, BELIV '06.
[104] Leonard J. Bass,et al. Identifying gaps between HCI, software engineering, and design, and boundary objects to bridge them , 2004, CHI EA '04.
[105] Kristian Kreiner,et al. Tacit knowledge management: the role of artifacts , 2002, J. Knowl. Manag..
[106] Amrit Tiwana,et al. A design knowledge management system to support collaborative information product evolution , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..
[107] Christopher D. Wickens,et al. A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.
[108] Ben Shneiderman,et al. The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations , 1996, Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.
[109] José Pablo Cambronero Sánchez. Mining Software Artifacts for use in Automated Machine Learning , 2021 .
[110] Aditya G. Parameswaran,et al. Lux: Always-on Visualization Recommendations for Exploratory Data Science , 2021, ArXiv.
[111] Daniel A. Keim,et al. Learning and Teaching in Co-Adaptive Guidance for Mixed-Initiative Visual Analytics , 2020, EuroVA@Eurographics/EuroVis.
[112] Aditya G. Parameswaran,et al. A Human-in-the-loop Perspective on AutoML: Milestones and the Road Ahead , 2019, IEEE Data Eng. Bull..
[113] Michael Gleicher,et al. Considerations for Visualizing Comparison , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[114] Tamara Munzner,et al. Bridging from Goals to Tasks with Design Study Analysis Reports , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[115] Michael Gleicher,et al. Examples of model visualization cards Workflow status Examples of problem discovery cards , 2018 .
[116] Sebastian Schelter,et al. Automatically Tracking Metadata and Provenance of Machine Learning Experiments , 2017 .
[117] Janet Salmons. Expect Originality! Using Taxonomies to Structure Assignments that Support Original Work , 2008 .