The Acquisition of Grammatical Marking of Indefiniteness with the Indefinite Article a in L2 English

The article system is a notorious source of difficulty for second language (L2) learners of English, largely because it is based on a complex set of abstract distinctions which are, to some extent, arbitrarily mapped onto surface forms ( a, the , and zero ). This difficulty is only compounded when learners’ first languages (L1s) do not share the same surface features and/or the same semantic conceptualizations with the target language (TL). This study is about the acquisition of grammatical marking of indefiniteness in L2 English as exemplified by a learner’s use of the indefinite article a. The ways in which L2 acquirers manage to make sense of English articles and even the cases when they do not offer fascinating insights into learners’ cognition (Young, 1996). The specific focus of this study is on whether differences in the grammatical treatment of indefiniteness in L1 and L2 correspond with detectable and systematic differences in interlanguage (Selinker, 1972).

[1]  S. Levinson,et al.  Rethinking Linguistic Relativity , 1991, Current Anthropology.

[2]  Terence Odlin,et al.  Cross‐Linguistic Influence , 2008 .

[3]  Peter Master,et al.  The English article system: Acquisition, function, and pedagogy , 1997 .

[4]  R. Dekeyser.  WHAT MAKES LEARNING SECOND-LANGUAGE GRAMMAR DIFFICULT? AREVIEW OF ISSUES , 2005 .

[5]  J. Lantolf.  Language Emergence: Implications for Applied Linguistics—A Sociocultural Perspective , 2006 .

[6]  Jun Yamada,et al.  The Use of the English Article among Japanese Students , 1982 .

[7]  Tania Ionin,et al.  Article semantics in second language acquisition , 2003 .

[8]  G. Cziko.  Testing the Language Bioprogram Hypothesis : A review of Children's Acquisition of Articles , 1986 .

[9]  Thom Huebner,et al.  A Longitudinal Analysis of the Acquisition of English , 1983 .

[10]  ZhaoHong Han,et al.  Understanding Second Language Process , 2008 .

[11]  D. Slobin.  Is spatial language a special case , 1993 .

[12]  Peter Master.  Information Structure and English Article Pedagogy. , 2002 .

[13]  Scott Jarvis,et al.  TOPIC CONTINUITY IN L2 ENGLISH ARTICLE USE , 2002, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[14]  Marina K. Burt,et al.  SHOULD WE TEACH CHILDREN SYNTAX , 1973 .

[15]  LESTER LOSCHKY,et al.  5 Grammar and Task-Based Methodology , .

[16]  Margaret Thomas,et al.  The acquisition of English articles by first- and second-language learners , 1989, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[17]  Eric Kellerman,et al.  Crosslinguistic Influence: Transfer to Nowhere? , 1995, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[18]  Fred R. Eckman.  MARKEDNESS AND THE CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS HYPOTHESIS , 1977 .

[20]  M. Maratsos.  The Use of Definite and Indefinite Reference in Young Children: An Experimental Study of Semantic Acquisition , 1976 .

[21]  S. Pinker.  Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1989 .

[22]  D. Larsen-Freeman,et al.  The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher's Course , 1983 .

[23]  Noam Chomsky.  Knowledge of Language , 1986 .

[24]  Robert W. Bley-Vroman.  THE COMPARATIVE FALLACY IN INTERLANGUAGE STUDIES: THE CASE OF SYSTEMATICITY1 , 1983 .

[25]  Susanne Rott,et al.  Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition , 2004 .

[26]  Richard Young.  Form-Function Relations in Articles in English Interlanguage , 1996 .

[27]  Michael H. Long,et al.  An introduction to second language acquisition research , 1990 .

[28]  Scott A Miller.  Developmental Research Methods , 1986 .

[29]  J. Carroll,et al.  Language, Thought and Reality , 1957 .

[30]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  Tasks and Language Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice. Multilingual Matters 93. , 1993 .

[31]  William C. Ritchie,et al.  Handbook of Second Language Acquisition , 1998 .

[32]  A. Pavlenko.  Emotions and the body in Russian and English , 2002 .

[33]  D. Gentner,et al.  Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought , 2003 .

[34]  Dilin Liu,et al.  Acquisition of the Article The by Nonnative Speakers of English: An Analysis of Four Nongeneric Uses , 2002 .

[35]  Betsy Parrish,et al.  Task-Related Variation in Interlanguage: The Case of Articles† , 1988 .

[36]  David Caplan.  Speaking. From Intention to Articulation by Willem J. M. Levelt, MIT Press, 1989. £35.95 (xiv + 566 pages) ISBN 0 262 12137 9 , 1990, Trends in Neurosciences.

[37]  Scott Jarvis,et al.  MORPHOLOGICAL TYPE, SPATIAL REFERENCE, AND LANGUAGE TRANSFER , 2000, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[38]  Craig Chaudron,et al.  Discourse Markedness and Structural Markedness , 1990, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[39]  Lydia White,et al.  Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: Persistent problems with inflectional morphology , 2003, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[40]  Daniel Robertson,et al.  Variability in the use of the English article system by Chinese learners of English , 2000 .

[41]  Yong Lang,et al.  The acquisition sequence of English articles : a longitudinal case study of a Chinese ESL learner in the American context , 1998 .

[42]  Peter Master.  A cross-linguistic interlanguage analysis of the acquisition of the English article system , 1987 .

[43]  K. Bardovi-Harlig.  Tense and aspect in second language acquisition : form, meaning, and use , 2000 .

[44]  Elaine Tarone,et al.  VARIABILITY IN INTERLANGUAGE USE: A STUDY OF STYLE‐SHIFTING IN MORPHOLOGY AND SYNTAX , 1985 .

[45]  Wilga M. Rivers,et al.  Communicating naturally in a second language , 1983 .

[46]  Anna Wierzbicka.  The semantics of grammar , 1988 .

[47]  R. Brown.  A First Language , 1973 .

[48]  H. Zobl.  A Direction for Contrastive Analysis: The Comparative Study of Developmental Sequences* , 1982 .

[49]  John R. Anderson.  Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications , 1980 .

[50]  D. Slobin.  Thinking for Speaking , 1987 .

[51]  Thurston Dart,et al.  The Interpretation of Music , 1955 .

[52]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Referential and quantificational indefinites , 1982 .

[53]  J. Lucy,et al.  Grammatical categories and cognition , 1992 .

[54]  D. Slobin.  LANGUAGE AND THOUGHT ONLINE: COGNITIVE CONSEQUENCES OF LINGUISTIC RELATIVITY , 2003 .

[55]  D. Slobin.  From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking” , 1996 .

[56]  D. Bickerton.  The roots of language , 2016 .

[57]  Diane Larsen-Freeman,et al.  Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics - Introduction to the special issue , 2006 .

[58]  J. Fodor.  The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[59]  Betsy Parrish,et al.  A New Look at Methodologies in the Study of Article Acquisition for Learners of ESL. , 1987 .

[60]  S. Engel.  Thought and Language , 1964 .

[61]  D. Larsen-Freeman.  The Emergence of Complexity, Fluency, and Accuracy in the Oral and Written Production of Five Chinese Learners of English , 2006 .