The existence of complex predicates seems to support an abundant conception of properties. Specifically, the application conditions for complex predicates seem to be explained by the distribution of a sparser base of predicates. This explanatory link might suggest that the existence and distribution of properties expressed by complex predicates are explained by the existence and distribution of a sparser base of properties. Thus, complex predicates seem to legitimize the assumption of a wide array of properties. The additional properties are no explanatory addition to the sparse base. I argue, however, that construing complex predicates as expressing properties undermines the explanatory links between simple and complex predications. The argument explores a variety of accounts of complex predicates currently on offer and develops a number of themes from the work of Herbert Hochberg.
[1]
Jessica M. Wilson.
No Work for a Theory of Grounding
,
2014
.
[2]
C. S. Jenkins,et al.
Is Metaphysical Dependence Irreflexive
,
2011
.
[3]
Saul A. Kripke.
Russell's Notion of Scope
,
2005
.
[4]
Nathan Salmon.
Lambda in Sentences with Designators: An Ode to Complex Predication
,
2010
.
[5]
Mats Rooth,et al.
Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity
,
2008
.
[6]
B. Russell.
II.—On Denoting
,
1905
.
[7]
No class: Russell on contextual definition and the elimination of sets
,
2008
.
[8]
Herbert Hochberg,et al.
Properties, abstracts, and the axiom of infinity
,
1977,
J. Philos. Log..
[9]
Peter Hylton.
Functions and Propositional Functions in Principia Mathematica
,
2005
.
[10]
Syntax in Basic Laws §§29–32
,
2010
.