Blending Face-to-Face Higher Education with Web-Based Lectures: Comparing Different Didactical Application Scenarios

Blended learning as an instructional approach is getting more attention in the educational landscape and has been researched thoroughly. Yet, this study reports the results of an innovation project aiming to gain insight into three different scenarios of applying web-based lectures: as preparation for face-to-face practical exercises, as a repetition of parts of the course, and as an extension of the course. Both the benefits regarding students’ satisfaction, perceived educational effects and the effect on student characteristics were investigated. Results indicate that all students evaluate web-based technology as an added value in higher education. Yet, comparison of the three application scenarios showed that web-based lectures are evaluated most positively when used as course preparation whereas when used as course extension, they were appreciated the least. However, there are indications that student characteristics could play a significant role in the level of appreciation of web-based lectures. We conclude that the potential of web-based lectures lies in their adaptability for use in several scenarios according to educational goals.

[1]  Colin Robson,et al.  Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers , 1993 .

[2]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq) , 1993 .

[3]  Kate Orton-Johnson,et al.  'I've stuck to the path I'm afraid': exploring student non-use of blended learning , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[4]  Milan Taradi,et al.  Blending problem-based learning with Web technology positively impacts student learning outcomes in acid-base physiology. , 2005, Advances in physiology education.

[5]  Susan J. Gribble,et al.  Lecture attendance and web based lecture technologies: A comparison of student perceptions and usage patterns , 2009 .

[6]  D. Schunk Self-Regulated Learning: The Educational Legacy of Paul R. Pintrich , 2005 .

[7]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs , 2005 .

[8]  Lázaro Rodríguez Ariza,et al.  Blended learning in higher education: Students' perceptions and their relation to outcomes , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[9]  D. Garrison,et al.  Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[10]  J. Biggs Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment , 1996 .

[11]  Betty Collis,et al.  Flexibility in Higher Education: Revisiting Expectations , 2011 .

[12]  Charles R. Graham BLENDED LEARNING SYSTEMS: DEFINITION, CURRENT TRENDS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 2005 .

[13]  Rob Phillips,et al.  Web-based lecture technologies: blurring the boundaries between face-to-face and distance learning , 2008 .

[14]  Pao-Ta Yu,et al.  Screen-capturing System with Two-layer Display for PowerPoint Presentation to Enhance Classroom Education , 2011, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[15]  Neil D. Fleming,et al.  Not Another Inventory, Rather a Catalyst for Reflection , 1992 .

[16]  James D. Foley,et al.  Evaluating a Web Lecture Intervention in a Human–Computer Interaction Course , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[17]  P. Pintrich A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). , 1991 .

[18]  Peter Goodyear,et al.  A blended learning Approach to teaching foreign policy: Student experiences of learning through face-to-face and online discussion and their relationship to academic performance , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Greg Preston,et al.  Web-based lecture technologies: highlighting the changing nature of teaching and learning , 2010 .

[20]  Herng-Yow Chen,et al.  Web-based synchronized multimedia lecture system design for teaching/learning Chinese as second language , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[21]  James D. Foley,et al.  Investigating learning with web lectures , 2008 .

[22]  Rob Phillips,et al.  The impact of Web-based lecture technologies on current and future practices in learning and teaching , 2008 .

[23]  T. Vincent,et al.  Blending online techniques with traditional face to face teaching methods to deliver final year undergraduate radiology learning content. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[24]  Doo Hun Lim,et al.  Learner and Instructional Factors Influencing Learning Outcomes within a Blended Learning Environment , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[25]  Ron Owston,et al.  Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[26]  Betty Collis,et al.  Flexibilidad en la educación superior: revisión de expectativas , 2011 .

[27]  Masao Sakauchi,et al.  WhiteboardVCR: a Web Lecture Production Tool for Combining Human Narration and Text-to-Speech Synthesis , 2002, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[28]  Annemieke Vermeyen,et al.  DIDACTIC SCENARIO'S FOR AN EFFECTIVE USE OF WEBLECTURES: A COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH PROJECT IN HIGHER AND UNIVERSITY EDUCATION TO MAXIMIZE THE USE OF WEBLECTURES AND ITS EFFECT ON LEARNING , 2010 .

[29]  Hilde Van Keer,et al.  Preferences for Team Learning and Lecture-Based Learning Among First-Year Undergraduate Accounting Students , 2013 .

[30]  Jean Ashton,et al.  Juggling the balls—study, work, family and play: student perspectives on flexible and blended heutagogy , 2007 .