Integration of EEG source imaging and fMRI during continuous viewing of natural movies.

Electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) are noninvasive neuroimaging tools which can be used to measure brain activity with excellent temporal and spatial resolution, respectively. By combining the neural and hemodynamic recordings from these modalities, we can gain better insight into how and where the brain processes complex stimuli, which may be especially useful in patients with different neural diseases. However, due to their vastly different spatial and temporal resolutions, the integration of EEG and fMRI recordings is not always straightforward. One fundamental obstacle has been that paradigms used for EEG experiments usually rely on event-related paradigms, while fMRI is not limited in this regard. Therefore, here we ask whether one can reliably localize stimulus-driven EEG activity using the continuously varying feature intensities occurring in natural movie stimuli presented over relatively long periods of time. Specifically, we asked whether stimulus-driven aspects in the EEG signal would be co-localized with the corresponding stimulus-driven BOLD signal during free viewing of a movie. Secondly, we wanted to integrate the EEG signal directly with the BOLD signal, by estimating the underlying impulse response function (IRF) that relates the BOLD signal to the underlying current density in the primary visual area (V1). We made sequential fMRI and 64-channel EEG recordings in seven subjects who passively watched 2-min-long segments of a James Bond movie. To analyze EEG data in this natural setting, we developed a method based on independent component analysis (ICA) to reject EEG artifacts due to blinks, subject movement, etc., in a way unbiased by human judgment. We then calculated the EEG source strength of this artifact-free data at each time point of the movie within the entire brain volume using low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA). This provided for every voxel in the brain (i.e., in 3D space) an estimate of the current density at every time point. We then carried out a correlation between the time series of visual contrast changes in the movie with that of EEG voxels. We found the most significant correlations in visual area V1, just as seen in previous fMRI studies (Bartels A, Zeki, S, Logothetis NK. Natural vision reveals regional specialization to local motion and to contrast-invariant, global flow in the human brain. Cereb Cortex 2008;18(3):705-717), but on the time scale of milliseconds rather than of seconds. To obtain an estimate of how the EEG signal relates to the BOLD signal, we calculated the IRF between the BOLD signal and the estimated current density in area V1. We found that this IRF was very similar to that observed using combined intracortical recordings and fMRI experiments in nonhuman primates. Taken together, these findings open a new approach to noninvasive mapping of the brain. It allows, firstly, the localization of feature-selective brain areas during natural viewing conditions with the temporal resolution of EEG. Secondly, it provides a tool to assess EEG/BOLD transfer functions during processing of more natural stimuli. This is especially useful in combined EEG/fMRI experiments, where one can now potentially study neural-hemodynamic relationships across the whole brain volume in a noninvasive manner.

[1]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Functional imaging with low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA): a review. , 2002, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.

[2]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Natural vision reveals regional specialization to local motion and to contrast-invariant, global flow in the human brain. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  Daniel Yoshor,et al.  Receptive fields in human visual cortex mapped with surface electrodes. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  Deborah A. Vitacco,et al.  Correspondence of event‐related potential tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging during language processing , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[5]  R. Edelman,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging (2) , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  F Kruggel,et al.  Recording of the event‐related potentials during functional MRI at 3.0 Tesla field strength , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  R. Freeman,et al.  Neurometabolic coupling in cerebral cortex reflects synaptic more than spiking activity , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  Shozo Tobimatsu,et al.  Visual evoked cortical magnetic responses to checkerboard pattern reversal stimulation: A study on the neural generators of N75, P100 and N145 , 1998, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[9]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  Andreas Schulze-Bonhage,et al.  Signal quality of simultaneously recorded invasive and non-invasive EEG , 2009, NeuroImage.

[12]  T. Hendler,et al.  Contrast sensitivity in human visual areas and its relationship to object recognition. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Frequency-Band Coupling in Surface EEG Reflects Spiking Activity in Monkey Visual Cortex , 2009, Neuron.

[14]  B. Brinkmann,et al.  Localization of the Epileptic Focus by Low-Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography in Patients with a Lesion Demonstrated by MRI , 2004, Brain Topography.

[15]  Mia Liljeström,et al.  Comparing MEG and fMRI views to naming actions and objects , 2009, NeuroImage.

[16]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis , 2007, NeuroImage.

[17]  S. Zeki,et al.  Functional brain mapping during free viewing of natural scenes , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[18]  C H Lücking,et al.  A comparison between electric source localisation and fMRI during somatosensory stimulation. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  Robert Schmitt,et al.  Integration of fMRI and simultaneous EEG: towards a comprehensive understanding of localization and time-course of brain activity in target detection , 2004, NeuroImage.

[20]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[21]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[22]  C. Joyce,et al.  Automatic removal of eye movement and blink artifacts from EEG data using blind component separation. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[23]  Andreas Bartels,et al.  Brain dynamics during natural viewing conditions—A new guide for mapping connectivity in vivo , 2005, NeuroImage.

[24]  A. Leventhal,et al.  Signal timing across the macaque visual system. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Chantal Delon-Martin,et al.  Sequence of pattern onset responses in the human visual areas: an fMRI constrained VEP source analysis , 2004, NeuroImage.

[26]  Andreas Bartels,et al.  fMRI and its interpretations: an illustration on directional selectivity in area V5/MT , 2008, Trends in Neurosciences.

[27]  Nikos K. Logothetis,et al.  The effect of a serotonin-induced dissociation between spiking and perisynaptic activity on BOLD functional MRI , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Whittingstall Kevin,et al.  Correspondence of Visual Evoked Potentials with FMRI Signals in Human Visual Cortex , 2008, Brain Topography.

[29]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiology of the BOLD fMRI Signal in Awake Monkeys , 2008, Current Biology.

[30]  Mercedes Atienza,et al.  Muscle Artifact Removal from Human Sleep EEG by Using Independent Component Analysis , 2008, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  Kevin Whittingstall,et al.  Evaluating the spatial relationship of event‐related potential and functional MRI sources in the primary visual cortex , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[32]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal , 2001, Nature.

[33]  Anna W Roe,et al.  Optical imaging of contrast response in Macaque monkey V1 and V2. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  Combining electrophysiological and hemodynamic measures of the auditory oddball. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[35]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Identification of the neural sources of the pattern-reversal VEP , 2005, NeuroImage.

[36]  R D Pascual-Marqui,et al.  Differential effects of normal aging on sources of standard N1, target N1 and target P300 auditory event-related brain potentials revealed by low resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA). , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[37]  R. Shapley,et al.  LFP power spectra in V1 cortex: the graded effect of stimulus contrast. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  J. Ford,et al.  Combined event‐related fMRI and EEG evidence for temporal—parietal cortex activation during target detection , 1997, Neuroreport.

[39]  T. Koenig,et al.  Low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) functional imaging in acute, neuroleptic-naive, first-episode, productive schizophrenia , 1999, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.