A Distributed Cognition Approach to Understanding Information Transfer in Mission Critical Domains

We developed a conceptual framework that describes how information transfer occurs in mission critical domains using a distributed cognition approach. According to this framework, information tools and the physical workspace comprise an “information arena”, which plays a crucial role in information transfer. Information tools and the information arena support joint work and may improve efficiency and reliability by providing visual cues to collaborators, by getting everyone on the same page, by helping collaborators focus on critical information, by facilitating attention management under time pressure, and by providing an evanescent (transient) communication space. We illustrate the concepts in this framework using an example from multidisciplinary rounds, an information transfer mechanism common in the intensive care unit, a mission critical domain. The framework can be used as a guide to further understanding of information transfer in mission critical domains and to develop information tools that facilitate and enhance discourse.

[1]  M. Abe,et al.  Autoimmune hepatitis associated with Graves' disease. , 2003, Internal medicine.

[2]  William B Lober,et al.  A randomized, controlled trial evaluating the impact of a computerized rounding and sign-out system on continuity of care and resident work hours. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[3]  Brian Hazlehurst,et al.  How the ICU Follows Orders: Care Delivery as a Complex Activity System , 2003, AMIA.

[4]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  From Web press to Web pressure: multimedia representations and multimedia publishing , 1997, CHI.

[5]  Colin F. Mackenzie,et al.  Cognitive properties of a whiteboard: A case study in a trauma centre , 2001, ECSCW.

[6]  Michael F. O'Connor,et al.  Using cognitive artifacts to understand distributed cognition , 2003, SMC'03 Conference Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Conference Theme - System Security and Assurance (Cat. No.03CH37483).

[7]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[8]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Understanding practice: video as a medium for reflection and design (excerpt) , 1992 .

[9]  S M Shortell,et al.  The Performance of Intensive Care Units: Does Good Management Make a Difference? , 1994, Medical care.

[10]  Christian Heath,et al.  Collaboration and controlCrisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground Line Control Rooms , 1992, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[11]  Richard I. Cook,et al.  Using cognitive artifacts to understand distributed cognition , 2004, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[12]  T Timpka,et al.  Cognitive Tools in Medical Teamwork: The Spatial Arrangement of Patient Records , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[13]  Richard Harper,et al.  "What a f-ing system! Send 'em all to the same place and then expect us to stop 'em hitting": Making Technology Work in Air Traffic Control , 1993 .

[14]  Robert S. Taylor,et al.  Information use environments. , 1991 .

[15]  Lois M. L. Delcambre,et al.  Bundles in the Wild: Managing Information to Solve Problems and Maintain Situation Awareness , 2000, Libr. Trends.

[16]  Jacqueline Moss,et al.  Technological System Solutions to Clinical Communication Error , 2005, The Journal of nursing administration.

[17]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Is paper safer? The role of paper flight strips in air traffic control , 1999, TCHI.

[18]  Brian Hazlehurst,et al.  The Cockpit as Multiple Activity System: A Computational Model for Understanding Situated Team Performance , 2003 .

[19]  Claus Bossen,et al.  A web of coordinative artifacts: collaborative work at a hospital ward , 2005, GROUP.

[20]  Y. Donchin,et al.  A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit , 2022 .

[21]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Artifacts and collaborative work in healthcare: methodological, theoretical, and technological implications of the tangible , 2005, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[22]  P. Pronovost,et al.  Improving communication in the ICU using daily goals. , 2003, Journal of critical care.

[23]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Review Paper: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Multidisciplinary Rounds to Design Information Technology , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[24]  Emily S. Patterson,et al.  Voice Loops as Coordination Aids in Space Shuttle Mission Control , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[25]  A. O’Connor,et al.  Communication loads on clinical staff in the emergency department , 2002, The Medical journal of Australia.