Fully coupled fluid–structure interaction model of congenital bicuspid aortic valves: effect of asymmetry on hemodynamics

A bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a congenital cardiac disorder where the valve consists of only two cusps instead of three, as in a normal tricuspid valve (TAV). Although 97 % of BAVs include asymmetric cusps, little or no prior studies have investigated the blood flow through a three-dimensional BAV and root. The aim of the present study was to characterize the effect of asymmetric BAV on the blood flow using fully coupled fluid–structure interaction (FSI) models with improved boundary conditions and tissue properties. This study presents four FSI models, including a native TAV, asymmetric BAVs with or without a raphe, and an almost symmetric BAV. Cusp tissue is composed of hyperelastic finite elements with collagen fibres embedded in the elastin matrix. A full cardiac cycle is simulated by imposing the same physiological blood pressures for all the TAV and BAV models. The latter have significantly smaller opening areas compared with the TAV. Larger stress values were found in the cusps of BAVs with fused cusps, at both the systolic and diastolic phases. The asymmetric geometry caused asymmetric vortices and much larger flow shear stress on the cusps which could be a potential initiator for early valvular calcification of BAVs.

[1]  A. Yoganathan,et al.  Experimental measurement of dynamic fluid shear stress on the aortic surface of the aortic valve leaflet , 2011, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology.

[2]  Ajit P. Yoganathan,et al.  Hemodynamics and Mechanobiology of Aortic Valve Inflammation and Calcification , 2011, International journal of inflammation.

[3]  E. Weinberg,et al.  A multiscale computational comparison of the bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves in relation to calcific aortic stenosis. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Hee Sun Kim,et al.  Nonlinear multi-scale anisotropic material and structural models for prosthetic and native aortic heart valves , 2009 .

[5]  Y. Missirlis,et al.  Aortic valve mechanics--Part I: material properties of natural porcine aortic valves. , 1978, Journal of bioengineering.

[6]  J. S. Lee,et al.  A linear relation between the compressibility and density of blood. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Gil Marom,et al.  A fluid–structure interaction model of the aortic valve with coaptation and compliant aortic root , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[8]  M. Thubrikar.  The Aortic Valve , 1990 .

[9]  Chang Nyung Kim,et al.  A Numerical Analysis of the Blood Flow Around the Bileaflet Mechanical Heart Valves with Different Rotational Implantation Angles , 2011 .

[10]  I. Borazjani,et al.  High-Resolution Fluid–Structure Interaction Simulations of Flow Through a Bi-Leaflet Mechanical Heart Valve in an Anatomic Aorta , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Brian John Bellhouse,et al.  Velocity and pressure distributions in the aortic valve , 1969, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  Fotis Sotiropoulos,et al.  Flow in Prosthetic Heart Valves: State-of-the-Art and Future Directions , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  M. Thubrikar,et al.  The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve: how does it function? Why does it fail? , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  J. Gorman,et al.  Effect of Geometry on the Leaflet Stresses in Simulated Models of Congenital Bicuspid Aortic Valves , 2011, Cardiovascular engineering and technology.

[15]  K. Chandran,et al.  Patient-specific bicuspid valve dynamics: overview of methods and challenges. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  Ajit P Yoganathan,et al.  Regional analysis of dynamic deformation characteristics of native aortic valve leaflets. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Neelakantan Saikrishnan,et al.  The Congenital Bicuspid Aortic Valve can Experience High Frequency Unsteady Shear Stresses on its Leaflet Surface , 2012 .

[18]  David Saloner,et al.  Significant material property differences between the porcine ascending aorta and aortic sinuses. , 2008, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[19]  David Saloner,et al.  Asymmetric mechanical properties of porcine aortic sinuses. , 2008, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[20]  M. Moon,et al.  The bicuspid aortic valve. , 2005, Current problems in cardiology.

[21]  A. Redaelli,et al.  Biomechanical implications of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve: a finite element study of aortic root function from in vivo data. , 2010, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[22]  Alfio Quarteroni,et al.  Helical flows and asymmetry of blood jet in dilated ascending aorta with normally functioning bicuspid valve , 2012, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology.

[23]  Santanu Chandra,et al.  Ex Vivo Evidence for the Contribution of Hemodynamic Shear Stress Abnormalities to the Early Pathogenesis of Calcific Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease , 2012, PloS one.

[24]  A. Yoganathan,et al.  Experimental measurement of dynamic fluid shear stress on the ventricular surface of the aortic valve leaflet , 2011, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology.

[25]  L. Antiga,et al.  Comparative finite element model analysis of ascending aortic flow in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve. , 2010, Artificial organs.

[26]  L. Antiga,et al.  Influence of bicuspid valve geometry on ascending aortic fluid dynamics: a parametric study. , 2012, Artificial organs.

[27]  Santanu Chandra,et al.  Computational assessment of bicuspid aortic valve wall-shear stress: implications for calcific aortic valve disease , 2012, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[28]  Gil Marom,et al.  A general three-dimensional parametric geometry of the native aortic valve and root for biomechanical modeling. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  Nikolay V. Vasilyev,et al.  In Vitro Characterization of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Hemodynamics Using Particle Image Velocimetry , 2012, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  Nobuyuki Umetani,et al.  Bicuspid aortic valves undergo excessive strain during opening: a simulation study. , 2013, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[31]  Ajit P. Yoganathan,et al.  Estimation of the Shear Stress on the Surface of an Aortic Valve Leaflet , 1999, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  A. Barker,et al.  Quantification of Hemodynamic Wall Shear Stress in Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve Using Phase-Contrast MRI , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[33]  Erwan Donal,et al.  Influence of structural geometry on the severity of bicuspid aortic stenosis. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.