Microbial dormancy improves development and experimental validation of ecosystem model

Climate feedbacks from soils can result from environmental change followed by response of plant and microbial communities, and/or associated changes in nutrient cycling. Explicit consideration of microbial life-history traits and functions may be necessary to predict climate feedbacks owing to changes in the physiology and community composition of microbes and their associated effect on carbon cycling. Here we developed the microbial enzyme-mediated decomposition (MEND) model by incorporating microbial dormancy and the ability to track multiple isotopes of carbon. We tested two versions of MEND, that is, MEND with dormancy (MEND) and MEND without dormancy (MEND_wod), against long-term (270 days) carbon decomposition data from laboratory incubations of four soils with isotopically labeled substrates. MEND_wod adequately fitted multiple observations (total C–CO2 and 14C–CO2 respiration, and dissolved organic carbon), but at the cost of significantly underestimating the total microbial biomass. MEND improved estimates of microbial biomass by 20–71% over MEND_wod. We also quantified uncertainties in parameters and model simulations using the Critical Objective Function Index method, which is based on a global stochastic optimization algorithm, as well as model complexity and observational data availability. Together our model extrapolations of the incubation study show that long-term soil incubations with experimental data for multiple carbon pools are conducive to estimate both decomposition and microbial parameters. These efforts should provide essential support to future field- and global-scale simulations, and enable more confident predictions of feedbacks between environmental change and carbon cycling.

[1]  William R. Wieder,et al.  Integrating microbial physiology and physio-chemical principles in soils with the MIcrobial-MIneral Carbon Stabilization (MIMICS) model , 2014 .

[2]  W. Post,et al.  Parameter estimation for models of ligninolytic and cellulolytic enzyme kinetics , 2012 .

[3]  S. Frey,et al.  Thermal adaptation of soil microbial respiration to elevated temperature. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[4]  W. Currie Modeling the Dynamics of Stable‐Isotope Ratios for Ecosystem Biogeochemistry , 2008 .

[5]  C. Prescott,et al.  Soil moisture is the major factor influencing microbial community structure and enzyme activities across seven biogeoclimatic zones in western Canada , 2012 .

[6]  Shu-lin Chen,et al.  Evaluation of a soil greenhouse gas emission model based on Bayesian inference and MCMC: Model uncertainty , 2013 .

[7]  Joshua P. Schimel,et al.  The implications of exoenzyme activity on microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation in soil: a theoretical model , 2003 .

[8]  A. Porporato,et al.  A theoretical analysis of microbial eco-physiological and diffusion limitations to carbon cycling in drying soils , 2014 .

[9]  J. Six,et al.  The role of soil characteristics on temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter , 2011 .

[10]  Jianwei Li,et al.  Legacies of native climate regime govern responses of boreal soil microbes to litter stoichiometry and temperature , 2013 .

[11]  Michael A. Wilson,et al.  Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Ash-influenced Soils of Inland Northwest Forests , 2007 .

[12]  W. Schlesinger,et al.  The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate , 1992 .

[13]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  The Global Stoichiometry of Litter Nitrogen Mineralization , 2008, Science.

[14]  E. Blagodatskaya,et al.  Active microorganisms in soil: Critical review of estimation criteria and approaches , 2013 .

[15]  Stefano Manzoni,et al.  Carbon use efficiency of microbial communities: stoichiometry, methodology and modelling. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[16]  Dominique Ripoche,et al.  Modelling the impact of thermal adaptation of soil microorganisms and crop system on the dynamics of organic matter in a tropical soil under a climate change scenario. , 2010 .

[17]  Francesca M. Hopkins,et al.  A framework for representing microbial decomposition in coupled climate models , 2012, Biogeochemistry.

[18]  J. Six,et al.  Do growth yield efficiencies differ between soil microbial communities differing in fungal : bacterial ratios? reality check and methodological issues , 2006 .

[19]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models , 1998 .

[20]  Jun Xia,et al.  Quantification of effects of climate variations and human activities on runoff by a monthly water balance model: A case study of the Chaobai River basin in northern China , 2009 .

[21]  Jay L. Devore,et al.  Probability and statistics for engineering and the sciences , 1982 .

[22]  J. Neff,et al.  Does adding microbial mechanisms of decomposition improve soil organic matter models? A comparison of four models using data from a pulsed rewetting experiment , 2009 .

[23]  M. Kramer,et al.  Stoichiometry constrains microbial response to root exudation- insights from a model and a field experiment in a temperate forest , 2012 .

[24]  D. Moorhead,et al.  A theoretical model of C- and N-acquiring exoenzyme activities, which balances microbial demands during decomposition , 2012 .

[25]  William R. Wieder,et al.  Global soil carbon projections are improved by modelling microbial processes , 2013 .

[26]  S. Jagadamma,et al.  Substrate quality alters the microbial mineralization of added substrate and soil organic carbon , 2014 .

[27]  Robert J. Abrahart,et al.  HydroTest: A web-based toolbox of evaluation metrics for the standardised assessment of hydrological forecasts , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[28]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall‐runoff models , 1992 .

[29]  W. Post,et al.  Decomposition of added and native organic carbon from physically separated fractions of diverse soils , 2014, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[30]  H. Heipieper,et al.  Incorporating dormancy in dynamic microbial community models , 2011 .

[31]  Charles T. Garten,et al.  Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: A review of methods and observations , 2000 .

[32]  Erika A. Sudderth,et al.  Linking leaf transcript levels to whole plant analyses provides mechanistic insights to the impact of warming and altered water availability in an annual grass , 2011 .

[33]  I. Hartley,et al.  Substrate quality and the temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter decomposition , 2008 .

[34]  M. Bradford Thermal adaptation of decomposer communities in warming soils , 2013, Front. Microbiol..

[35]  J. Schimel Soil carbon: Microbes and global carbon , 2013 .

[36]  K. Domsch,et al.  Maintenance carbon requirements of actively-metabolizing microbial populations under in situ conditions , 1985 .

[37]  W. Riley,et al.  A total quasi-steady-state formulation of substrate uptake kinetics in complex networks and an example application to microbial litter decomposition , 2013 .

[38]  J. Melillo,et al.  Soil warming, carbon–nitrogen interactions, and forest carbon budgets , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  K. Domsch,et al.  Determination of ecophysiological maintenance carbon requirements of soil microorganisms in a dormant state , 1985, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[40]  B. Caldwell Enzyme activities as a component of soil biodiversity: A review , 2005 .

[41]  Shu-lin Chen,et al.  A review on parameterization and uncertainty in modeling greenhouse gas emissions from soil , 2012 .

[42]  C. Schadt,et al.  Representation of Dormant and Active Microbial Dynamics for Ecosystem Modeling , 2013, PloS one.

[43]  E. Pendall,et al.  Does declining carbon‐use efficiency explain thermal acclimation of soil respiration with warming? , 2013, Global change biology.

[44]  R. Conant,et al.  Patterns of substrate utilization during long-term incubations at different temperatures , 2008 .

[45]  S. K. Schmidt,et al.  ESTIMATING THE BIOMASS OF MICROBIAL FUNCTIONAL GROUPS USING RATES OF GROWTH- RELATED SOIL RESPIRATION , 1996 .

[46]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Methods in Ecosystem Science , 2000, Springer New York.

[47]  M. Nanzyo Unique Properties of Volcanic Ash Soils , 2003 .

[48]  J. Lennon,et al.  Microbial seed banks: the ecological and evolutionary implications of dormancy , 2011, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[49]  D J Batstone,et al.  Kinetics of thermophilic, anaerobic oxidation of straight and branched chain butyrate and valerate , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[50]  W. Horwath,et al.  Decomposition of rice straw and microbial carbon use efficiency under different soil temperatures and moistures , 2000 .

[51]  Michael E. Barber,et al.  SWAT modeling with uncertainty and cluster analyses of tillage impacts on hydrological processes , 2014, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[52]  J. Lennon,et al.  Dormancy contributes to the maintenance of microbial diversity , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  S. Frey,et al.  Microbial biomass, functional capacity, and community structure after 12 years of soil warming , 2008 .

[54]  W. Post,et al.  A note on the reverse Michaelis–Menten kinetics , 2013 .

[55]  E. Davidson,et al.  The Dual Arrhenius and Michaelis–Menten kinetics model for decomposition of soil organic matter at hourly to seasonal time scales , 2012 .

[56]  Craig C. Brandt,et al.  Relation between Soil Order and Sorption of Dissolved Organic Carbon in Temperate Subsoils , 2012 .

[57]  Eoin L. Brodie,et al.  Integrating microbial ecology into ecosystem models: challenges and priorities , 2012, Biogeochemistry.

[58]  Charles T. Garten,et al.  Reconciling Change in Oi-Horizon 14C With Mass Loss for an Oak Forest , 2005 .

[59]  W. Post,et al.  Development of microbial-enzyme-mediated decomposition model parameters through steady-state and dynamic analyses. , 2013, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[60]  W. Verstraete,et al.  Estimation of active soil microbial biomass by mathematical analysis of respiration curves: Calibration of the test procedure , 1987 .

[61]  Mark A. Bradford,et al.  Soil-carbon response to warming dependent on microbial physiology , 2010 .

[62]  Andreas Richter,et al.  Environmental and stoichiometric controls on microbial carbon-use efficiency in soils. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[63]  Jizhong Zhou,et al.  Microbial mediation of carbon-cycle feedbacks to climate warming , 2012 .

[64]  R. Aerts,et al.  Temperature sensitivity of peatland C and N cycling: Does substrate supply play a role? , 2013 .

[65]  Andreas Richter,et al.  Microbial community dynamics alleviate stoichiometric constraints during litter decay , 2014, Ecology letters.

[66]  Joshua P. Schimel,et al.  Microbial control over carbon cycling in soil , 2012, Front. Microbio..

[67]  E. Delong,et al.  The Microbial Engines That Drive Earth's Biogeochemical Cycles , 2008, Science.

[68]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  A global analysis of soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in terrestrial ecosystems , 2013 .

[69]  J. Six,et al.  The temperature response of soil microbial efficiency and its feedback to climate , 2013 .

[70]  S. Morris,et al.  The determination of soil C pool sizes and turnover rates: Biophysical fractionation and tracers , 2001 .

[71]  W. Parton,et al.  ForCent model development and testing using the Enriched Background Isotope Study experiment , 2010 .