Selection of verbal probabilities: A solution for some problems of verbal probability expression.

Abstract A method for verbal expression of degree of uncertainty is described. It requires the subject to select a phrase from a list that spans the full range of probabilities. In a second, optional, step, the subject indicates the numerical meaning of each phrase. The method avoids two problems of verbal probabilities—the indefinitely large lexicon and the individual differences in the interpretation of words. To test whether context and ordinal position might bias subjects' selection or interpretation of the verbal expressions in the list, the list order was varied. When the verbal expressions were arranged in random order, ordinal position had a significant effect on the selection of expressions. However, these effects did not occur when the phrases were listed in ascending or descending order. Considerations of accuracy and interpersonal agreement also support the use of ordered phrase lists.

[1]  How medical professionals evaluate expressions of probability. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  M. Nakao,et al.  Numbers are better than words. Verbal specifications of frequency have no place in medicine. , 1983, The American journal of medicine.

[3]  John Fox,et al.  Knowledge, decision making, and uncertainty , 1986 .

[4]  James Shanteau,et al.  Component Processes in Risky Decision Making. , 1974 .

[5]  Karl Halvor Teigen,et al.  When are low-probability events judged to be ‘probable’? Effects of outcome-set characteristics on verbal probability estimates , 1988 .

[6]  Ido Erev,et al.  Understanding and using linguistic uncertainties , 1988 .

[7]  F. Mosteller,et al.  Quantitative meanings of verbal probability expressions. , 1989, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  Karl Halvor Teigen,et al.  The language of uncertainty , 1988 .

[9]  Ruth Beyth-Marom,et al.  How probable is probable? A numerical translation of verbal probability expressions , 1982 .

[10]  E Marshall.  Feynman Issues His Own Shuttle Report, Attacking NASA's Risk Estimates. , 1986, Science.

[11]  Alf Zimmer,et al.  Verbal Vs. Numerical Processing of Subjective Probabilities , 1983 .

[12]  Thomas S. Wallsten,et al.  Base rate effects on the interpretations of probability and frequency expressions , 1986 .

[13]  Sarah Lichtenstein,et al.  Empirical scaling of common verbal phrases associated with numerical probabilities , 1967 .

[14]  Wibecke Brun,et al.  Verbal probabilities: Ambiguous, context-dependent, or both? , 1988 .

[15]  D. Budescu,et al.  Consistency in interpretation of probabilistic phrases , 1985 .

[16]  R E Mapes,et al.  Verbal and numerical estimates of probability in therapeutic contexts. , 1979, Social science & medicine.

[17]  Rami Zwick,et al.  Combining stochastic uncertainty and linguistic inexactness: Theory and experimental evaluation , 1988, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[18]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Critical Decisions under Uncertainty: Representation and Structure , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  David V. Budescu,et al.  Decisions based on numerically and verbally expressed uncertainties. , 1988 .

[20]  R. H. Simpson,et al.  The specific meanings of certain terms indicating differing degrees of frequency. , 1944 .

[21]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Direct and indirect scaling of membership functions of probability phrases , 1987 .

[22]  R. Hamm.  Evaluation of a Method of Verbally Expressing Degree of Belief by Selecting Phrases from a List , 1990 .

[23]  Bob Woodward,et al.  Veil: The Secret Wars of the CIA, 1981-1987 , 1987 .

[24]  V F Reyna,et al.  The language of possibility and probability: Effects of negation on meaning , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[25]  S G Pauker,et al.  Screening for HIV: can we afford the false positive rate? , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  E Marshall,et al.  Academy Panel Faults NASA's Safety Analysis: The agency relies too heavily on subjective judgment rather than on statistical analysis in picking problems to focus on. , 1988, Science.