Compensation Structure and the Creation of Exploratory Knowledge in Technology Firms

Given the importance of exploration in a firm’s overall innovation program, scholars have sought to understand organizational factors that give rise to exploration-oriented innovations. We propose theory and empirical evidence that relates firms’ use of financial incentives to their exploratory innovation performance. We expect that a larger proportion of long-term incentives in R&D employee compensation should be positively associated with the creation of exploratory innovation in a firm. In addition, we propose that a higher level of horizontal pay dispersion is negatively associated with the creation of exploratory innovation. We examine innovations reflected in the patents of a unique six-year, unbalanced panel dataset of 94 high-technology firms in the U.S. Empirical results confirm that firms with high level of horizontal pay dispersion have less exploratory patent innovations. However, surprisingly, firms that pay their R&D employees a higher proportion of long-term financial incentives in total compensation have lower level of exploratory innovation. This implies the possibility that popular longterm incentive plans in high-technology sectors (e.g., stock option plans) have failed to achieve their intended goals in practice. We discuss factors that might moderate the negative impact of long-term incentives on exploratory innovation.

[1]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[2]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[3]  Janet H. Marler,et al.  Compensation strategy: Does business strategy influence compensation in high-technology firms? , 2006 .

[4]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  Firm‐specific knowledge resources and competitive advantage: the roles of economic‐ and relationship‐based employee governance mechanisms , 2009 .

[5]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  WHEN EXPLORATION BACKFIRES: UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF MULTILEVEL ORGANIZATIONAL SEARCH , 2006 .

[6]  C. Phelps A Longitudinal Study of the Influence of Alliance Network Structure and Composition on Firm Exploratory Innovation , 2009 .

[7]  Michael A. Hitt,et al.  Managerial Risk Taking in Diversified Firms: An Evolutionary Perspective , 1991 .

[8]  James B. Wade,et al.  Overpaid CEOs and Underpaid Managers: Fairness and Executive Compensation , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[9]  G. Milkovich,et al.  Relationships Among Risk, Incentive Pay, and Organizational Performance , 1998 .

[10]  Donald C. Hambrick,et al.  Pay Disparities Within Top Management Groups: Evidence of Harmful Effects on Performance of High-Technology Firms , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[11]  R. Rosenbloom,et al.  Engines of innovation : U.S. industrial research at the end of an era , 1996 .

[12]  Josh Lerner,et al.  Innovation and Incentives: Evidence from Corporate R&D , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[13]  M. Tushman,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations , 2010 .

[14]  E. Lazear,et al.  Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts , 1979, Journal of Political Economy.

[15]  L. Gómez-Mejia,et al.  IS CEO PAY IN HIGH-TECHNOLOGY FIRMS RELATED TO INNOVATION? , 2000 .

[16]  M. Bloom,et al.  The Performance Effects of Pay Dispersion on Individuals and Organizations , 1999 .

[17]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Top Executive Pay: Tournament or Teamwork? , 1993, Journal of Labor Economics.

[18]  J. Shaw,et al.  Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. , 1998 .

[19]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Peformance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[20]  A. Rappaport HOW TO DESIGN VALUE‐CONTRIBUTING EXECUTIVE INCENTIVES , 1983 .

[21]  Patricia M. Dechow,et al.  Executive incentives and the horizon problem: An empirical investigation , 1991 .

[22]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[23]  Ming-Jen Lin Opening the Black Box: The Internal Labor Markets of Company X , 2005 .

[24]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  CEO incentives, innovation, and performance in technology‐intensive firms: a reconciliation of outcome and behavior‐based incentive schemes , 2006 .

[25]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  Reprinted Article The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979–1995 , 2009 .

[26]  R. Gulati Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation ? , 2007 .

[27]  Scott Schaefer,et al.  Why Do Some Firms Give Stock Options to All Employees?: An Empirical Examination of Alternative Theories , 2004 .

[28]  Marcia J. Simmering,et al.  Compensation Policy and Organizational Performance: The Efficiency, Operational, and Financial Implications of Pay Levels and Pay Structure , 2003 .

[29]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Executive Compensation in the Information Technology Industry , 2000 .

[30]  I. Nonaka Toward Middle-Up-Down Management: Accelerating Information Creation , 1988 .

[31]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Boundary Spanning in a For-Profit Research Lab: An Exploration of the Interface Between Commerce and Academe , 2010 .

[32]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  The Effects of Psychologically Based Intervention Programs on Worker Productivity: A Meta-Analysis. , 1985 .

[33]  Michael A. Hitt,et al.  Conflicting Voices: The Effects of Institutional Ownership Heterogeneity and Internal Governance on Corporate Innovation Strategies , 2002 .

[34]  Jason D. Shaw,et al.  Pay dispersion and workforce performance: moderating effects of incentives and interdependence , 2002 .

[35]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[36]  Hassan Tehranian,et al.  The Effect of Long-term Performance Plans on Corporate Sell-Off-Induced Abnormal Returns , 1987 .

[37]  Giacomo Negro,et al.  Filling Empty Seats: How Status and Organizational Hierarchies Affect Exploration Versus Exploitation in Team Design , 2006 .

[38]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  How to kill creativity. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[39]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[40]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Knowledge Exchange and Combination: The Role of Human Resource Practices in the Performance of High-Technology Firms , 2006 .

[41]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Why do employers only reward extreme performance? Examining the relationships among performance, pay, and turnover. , 1992 .

[42]  R. Katila,et al.  Effects of Search Timing on Innovation: The Value of Not Being in Sync with Rivals , 2008 .

[43]  L. Bourgeois On the Measurement of Organizational Slack , 1981 .

[44]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[45]  John G. Michel,et al.  The Relationships Among Organizational Context, Pay Dispersion, and Among Managerial Turnover , 2002 .

[46]  Fred Luthans,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Organizational Behavior Modification on Task Performance, 1975–95 , 1997 .

[47]  Fredrik W. Andersson,et al.  Reaching for the Stars: Who Pays for Talent in Innovative Industries? , 2006 .

[48]  David F. Larcker,et al.  The Structure of Organizational Incentives , 1993 .

[49]  Nandini Rajagopalan,et al.  Strategic orientations, incentive plan adoptions, and firm performance: evidence from electric utility firms , 1997 .

[50]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Business unit innovation and the structure of executive compensation , 1995 .

[51]  B. Menguc,et al.  Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity , 2005 .

[52]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  The effect of governance modes and relatedness of external business development activities on innovative performance , 2008 .

[53]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Envy, Comparison Costs, and the Economic Theory of the Firm , 2006 .

[54]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Human resources and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based perspective , 1994 .

[55]  Ben Gerson The Search: How Google and Its Rivals Rewrote the Rules of Business and Transformed Our Culture , 2005 .

[56]  David B. Balkin,et al.  Toward a contingency theory of compensation strategy , 1987 .

[57]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. , 1993 .

[58]  April M. Franco,et al.  The Effect of Firm Compensation Structures on Employee Mobility and Employee Entrepreneurship of Extreme Performers , 2010 .

[59]  Barry Gerhart,et al.  Compensation: Theory, Evidence, and Strategic Implications , 2003 .

[60]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  The Multifaceted Nature of Exploration and Exploitation: Value of Supply, Demand, and Spatial Search for Innovation , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[61]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[62]  Scott A. Snell,et al.  External control, corporate strategy, and firm performance in research‐intensive industries , 1988 .

[63]  V. Vroom Work and motivation , 1964 .

[64]  Gregory B. Merrill,et al.  The effect of compensation program and structure on sbu competitive strategy: A study of technology‐intensive firms , 1991 .