Task-dependent processing of tables and graphs

In two experiments participants had to detect changes in periodic sinusoidal functions, displayed in either graphic or tabular displays. Graphs had a major advantage over tables when the task required considering configurations of data. Both displays led to similar results when task performance could rely on inspecting individual data points. With graphs almost all participants reported using the optimal method for detecting changes in the function, i.e., they used the method requiring the least effort to perform the task. With tables only about half used the optimal detection method, and these participants showed transfer of learning of detection methods between tasks. Experience in using a detection method led to improved performance if the new task relied on the same method of detection. These findings demonstrate the need to consider task performance methods when determining the relative value of different displays. The set of tasks for which a display is used is likely to affect performance and needs to be analysed as a whole, since methods employed for one task can affect task performance in other tasks.

[1]  Joachim Meyer,et al.  Monitoring dynamic processes with alphanumeric and graphic displays , 2001 .

[2]  William Remus,et al.  A Study of Graphical and Tabular Displays and Their Interaction with Environmental Complexity , 1987 .

[3]  William Playfair,et al.  The commercial and political atlas , 1976 .

[4]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[5]  Joachim Meyer,et al.  Information Structure and the Relative Efficacy of Tables and Graphs , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[6]  Joachim Meyer,et al.  Multiple Factors that Determine Performance with Tables and Graphs , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[7]  Edward Rolf Tufte,et al.  The visual display of quantitative information , 1985 .

[8]  W. Cleveland,et al.  Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods , 1984 .

[9]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  Envisioning Information , 1990 .

[10]  Wai-Tat Fu,et al.  Resolving the paradox of the active user: stable suboptimal performance in interactive tasks , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[11]  John M. Chambers,et al.  Graphical Methods for Data Analysis , 1983 .

[12]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Suboptimal tradeoffs in information seeking , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  George Kingsley Zipf,et al.  Human behavior and the principle of least effort , 1949 .

[14]  J Meyer,et al.  Performance with tables and graphs: effects of training and a Visual Search Model , 2000, Ergonomics.

[15]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of the Use of Computer-Based Graphics in Decision Making , 1981 .

[16]  Robert McGill,et al.  An Experiment in Graphical Perception , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[17]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Information integration and the object display An interaction of task demands and display superiority , 1987 .

[18]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Paradox of the active user , 1987 .

[19]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1986 .

[20]  Priti Shah,et al.  A Model of the Perceptual and Conceptual Processes in Graph Comprehension , 1998 .

[21]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[22]  John Millar Carroll.  Interfacing Thought: Cognitive Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction , 2003 .

[23]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Proximity Compatibility Principle: Its Psychological Foundation and Relevance to Display Design , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[24]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Learning to Choose the Most Effective Strategy: Explorations in Expected Value , 2004, ICCM.

[25]  R McGill,et al.  Graphical Perception and Graphical Methods for Analyzing Scientific Data , 1985, Science.

[26]  Bruce G Coury,et al.  Alphanumeric and graphic displays for dynamic process monitoring and control. , 1989, Ergonomics.

[27]  Gerald L. Lohse,et al.  A Cognitive Model for Understanding Graphical Perception , 1993, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[28]  Joachim Meyer.  A New Look at an Old Study on Information Display: Washburne (1927) Reconsidered , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[29]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  The Impact of the Mode of Information Presentation on Learning and Performance , 1980 .