Creative Introspection and Knowledge Acquisition

Introspection is a question-led process in which one builds on what one already knows to explore what is possible and plausible. In creative introspection, whether in art or in science, framing the right question is as important as finding the right answer. Presupposition-laden questions are themselves a source of knowledge, and in this paper we show how widely-held beliefs about the world can be dynamically acquired by harvesting such questions from the Web. We show how metaphorical reasoning can be modeled as an introspective process, one that builds on questions harvested from the Web to pose further speculative questions and queries. Metaphor is much more than a knowledge-hungry rhetorical device: it is a conceptual lever that allows a system to extend its model of the world.

[1]  Treebank Penn,et al.  Linguistic Data Consortium , 1999 .

[2]  Tony Veale,et al.  Making Lexical Ontologies Functional and Context-Sensitive , 2007, ACL.

[3]  Anna Korhonen,et al.  Metaphor Identification Using Verb and Noun Clustering , 2010, COLING.

[4]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  The role of similarity in similes and metaphors , 1993 .

[5]  Marti A. Hearst Automatic Acquisition of Hyponyms from Large Text Corpora , 1992, COLING.

[6]  Eileen Cornell Way Knowledge Representation and Metaphor , 1991 .

[7]  James H. Martin A Computational Model of Metaphor Interpretation , 1990 .

[8]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .

[9]  Brian Falkenhainer,et al.  The Structure-Mapping Engine: Algorithm and Examples , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[10]  Michael L. Littman,et al.  Corpus-based Learning of Analogies and Semantic Relations , 2005, Machine Learning.

[11]  Dan Fass,et al.  met*: A Method for Discriminating Metonymy and Metaphor by Computer , 1991, CL.

[12]  Massimo Poesio,et al.  Attribute-Based and Value-Based Clustering: An Evaluation , 2004, EMNLP.

[13]  Tony Veale,et al.  Comprehending and Generating Apt Metaphors: A Web-driven, Case-based Approach to Figurative Language , 2007, AAAI.

[14]  Yorick Wilks,et al.  Making Preferences More Active , 1978, Artif. Intell..

[15]  Benjamin Van Durme,et al.  What You Seek Is What You Get: Extraction of Class Attributes from Query Logs , 2007, IJCAI.

[16]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Book Reviews: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database , 1999, CL.

[17]  Graeme Hirst,et al.  Evaluating WordNet-based Measures of Lexical Semantic Relatedness , 2006, CL.

[18]  Margaret A. Boden,et al.  Creativity: A framework for research , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.