The effect of receiver coil orientations on the imaging performance of magnetic induction tomography

Magnetic induction tomography is an imaging modality which aims to reconstruct the conductivity distribution of the human body. It uses magnetic induction to excite the body and an array of sensor coils to detect the perturbations in the magnetic field. Up to now, much effort has been expended with the aim of finding an efficient coil configuration to extend the dynamic range of the measured signal. However, the merits of different sensor orientations on the imaging performance have not been studied in great detail so far. Therefore, the aim of the study is to fill the void of a systematic investigation of coil orientations on the reconstruction quality of the designs. To this end, a number of alternative receiver array designs with different coil orientations were suggested and the evaluations of the designs were performed based on the singular value decomposition. A generalized class of quality measures, the subclasses of which are linked to both the spatial resolution and uncertainty measures, was used to assess the performance on the radial and axial axes of a cylindrical phantom. The detectability of local conductivity perturbations in the phantom was explored using the reconstructed images. It is possible to draw the conclusion that the proper choice of the coil orientations significantly influences the number of usable singular vectors and accordingly the stability of image reconstruction, although the effect of increased stability on the quality of the reconstructed images was not of paramount importance due to the reduced independent information content of the associated singular vectors.

[1]  Martin Schweiger,et al.  MULTILEVEL PRECONDITIONING FOR 3D LARGE-SCALE SOFT-FIELD MEDICAL APPLICATIONS MODELLING , 2006 .

[2]  D Gürsoy,et al.  Reconstruction artefacts in magnetic induction tomography due to patient's movement during data acquisition , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[3]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  Rank-Deficient and Discrete Ill-Posed Problems , 1996 .

[4]  Nevzat G. Gencer,et al.  Electrical conductivity imaging via contactless measurements: an experimental study , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  H Griffiths,et al.  A magnetic induction tomography system for samples with conductivities below 10 S m−1 , 2008 .

[6]  O. Dössel,et al.  Planar system for magnetic induction conductivity measurement using a sensor matrix. , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[7]  Patricia Brunner,et al.  Solution of the inverse problem of magnetic induction tomography (MIT) , 2005, Physiological measurement.

[8]  H Griffiths,et al.  Magnetic Induction Tomography: A Measuring System for Biological Tissues , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Hermann Scharfetter,et al.  Biological tissue characterization by magnetic induction spectroscopy (MIS): requirements and limitations , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  G. Temple Static and Dynamic Electricity , 1940, Nature.

[11]  H Scharfetter,et al.  Hardware for quasi-single-shot multifrequency magnetic induction tomography (MIT): the Graz Mk2 system. , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[12]  John R. Mortarelli A Generalization of the Geselowitz Relationship Useful in Impedance Plethysmographic Field Calculations , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Joaquim Ferreira,et al.  An overview of electromagnetic inductance tomography: Description of three different systems , 1996 .

[14]  Nevzat G. Gencer,et al.  Electrical conductivity imaging via contactless measurements , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Hermann Scharfetter,et al.  Magnetic induction tomography: comparison of the image quality using different types of receivers. , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[16]  Andrew Curtis,et al.  Optimal design of focused experiments and surveys , 1999 .

[17]  Hermann Scharfetter,et al.  Magnetic induction tomography: evaluation of the point spread function and analysis of resolution and image distortion. , 2007, Physiological measurement.

[18]  C H Igney,et al.  A measurement system and image reconstruction in magnetic induction tomography. , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[19]  H. Lackner,et al.  Magnetic induction tomography: hardware for multi-frequency measurements in biological tissues. , 2001, Physiological measurement.

[20]  A Korjenevsky,et al.  Magnetic induction tomography: experimental realization. , 2000, Physiological measurement.

[21]  O Dössel,et al.  A comparison of sensors for minimizing the primary signal in planar-array magnetic induction tomography. , 2005, Physiological measurement.

[22]  Hermann Scharfetter,et al.  A new type of gradiometer for the receiving circuit of magnetic induction tomography (MIT). , 2005, Physiological measurement.

[23]  H. Griffiths Magnetic induction tomography , 2001 .

[24]  Manuchehr Soleimani,et al.  Absolute Conductivity Reconstruction in Magnetic Induction Tomography Using a Nonlinear Method , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  H Griffiths,et al.  A primary field compensation scheme for planar array magnetic induction tomography. , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[26]  O Dössel,et al.  Design and performance of a planar-array MIT system with normal sensor alignment. , 2005, Physiological measurement.

[27]  Manuchehr Soleimani,et al.  Computational aspects of low frequency electrical and electromagnetic tomography: A review study , 2008 .