See Blockindiscussions, Blockinstats, Blockinand Blockinauthor Blockinprofiles Blockinfor Blockinthis Blockinpublication the Blockinsyntax-discourse Blockindivide: Processing Blockinellipsis

VP-ellipsis and sluicing are forms of ellipsis that can cross a sentence boundary. We present a series of comprehension studies on these forms of ellipsis to elucidate their processing and the relation of syntactic and discourse processing. One set of studies examines the hypothesis that the representation of elided material is syntactically structured. We present evidence supporting the hypothesis and tentatively attribute the effects to sharing of the structure of the antecedent constituent, with structure building or substitution of a variable for a constituent permitted if it is licensed by the syntactic principles of the language. Another set of studies tests the hypothesis that a new utterance is preferentially related to the main assertion of the preceding utterance, which is typically a constituent high in the syntactic tree. The results suggest that discourse processing differs from syntactic processing, where the most accessible material is recent material found low in the syntactic tree. A final set of studies examines the interplay of the syntactic processor, which may not violate "islands," and the discourse processor, which may, in the processing of ellipsis sentences involving islands. A novel explanation is offered for the observation (Ross 1967) that sluicing out of relative-clause islands is grammatical except when sprouting is required.

[1]  Scott Weinstein,et al.  Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse , 1995, CL.

[2]  John Robert Ross,et al.  Constraints on variables in syntax , 1967 .

[3]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[4]  Davin Caplan.  Clause boundaries and recognition latencies for words in sentences , 1972 .

[5]  Maribel Romero,et al.  Focus and reconstruction effects in wh-phrases , 1998 .

[6]  M. Pickering,et al.  Plausibility and the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies:An Eye-Tracking Study , 1996 .

[7]  Janet D. Fodor.  Prosodic disambiguation in silent deading , 2002 .

[8]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Ellipsis and discourse coherence , 2006, Linguistics and philosophy.

[9]  Susanne Lynn Tunstall,et al.  The interpretation of quantifiers : semantics & processing , 1998 .

[10]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Discourse Cues to Ambiguity Resolution: Evidence From "Do It" Comprehension , 2003 .

[11]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Parsing Coordinates and Ellipsis: Copy α , 2001 .

[12]  A. Hollingworth,et al.  Thematic Roles Assigned along the Garden Path Linger , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  D. Hardt.  Dynamic Interpretation of Verb Phrase Ellipsis , 1999 .

[14]  J. Sachs.  Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse , 1967 .

[15]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Processing “d-Linked” Phrases , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[16]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Sentence Reanalysis, and Visibility , 1998 .

[17]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  ON COMPREHENDING SENTENCES: SYNTACTIC PARSING STRATEGIES. , 1979 .

[18]  Mark Steedman,et al.  The use of context by the psychological parser , 1981 .

[19]  Jason Merchant,et al.  The syntax of silence : sluicing, islands, and identity in ellipsis , 1999 .

[20]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Toward a theory of anaphoric processing , 1984 .

[21]  J. Kimball.  Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language , 1973 .

[22]  L Frazier,et al.  On Bound Variable Interpretations: The LF-Only Hypothesis , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[23]  William A. Ladusaw,et al.  Sluicing and logical form , 1995 .

[24]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  Natural language parsing: How can grammars help parsers? , 1985 .

[25]  Jorge Hankamer,et al.  Deep and surface anaphora , 1993 .

[26]  Stuart M. Shieber,et al.  Interactions of scope and ellipsis , 1996 .

[27]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Deletion And Logical Form , 1976 .

[28]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Morphosyntactic and Pragmatic Factors Affecting the Accessibility of Discourse Entities , 1993 .

[29]  G. McKoon,et al.  A pragmatic analysis of so-called anaphoric islands , 1991 .

[30]  Norbert Horstein,et al.  An argument for minimalism: the case of antecedent-contained deletion , 1994 .

[31]  E. Prince.  On the Limits of Syntax, with reference to Left-Dislocation and Topicalization , 1998 .

[32]  C. Clifton,et al.  The independence of syntactic processing , 1986 .

[33]  E. Williams,et al.  Indices and identity , 1994 .

[34]  Katy Carlson,et al.  Parallelism and Prosody in the Processing of Ellipsis Sentences , 2002 .

[35]  Thomas G. Bever,et al.  Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules , 2001 .

[36]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Psychology of Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics and Generative Grammar , 1976 .

[37]  Christopher Kennedy,et al.  Ellipsis and syntactic representation , 2003 .

[38]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Comprehension of Deep and Surface Verbphrase Anaphors , 1990 .

[39]  Randall Hendrick,et al.  The Representation and Processing of Coreference in Discourse , 1998, Cogn. Sci..

[40]  Mats Rooth,et al.  Ellipsis redundancy and reduction redundancy , 1992 .

[41]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .

[42]  E. Gibson.  Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[43]  C. Clifton,et al.  Processing Elided Verb Phrases with Flawed Antecedents: the Recycling Hypothesis. , 2006, Journal of memory and language.

[44]  R. May.  Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation , 1985 .

[45]  Howard Lasnik,et al.  Successive-Cyclic Movement and Island Repair: The Difference between Sluicing and VP-Ellipsis , 2003, Linguistic Inquiry.

[46]  R. Jarvella,et al.  Clause structure of sentences and speech processing , 1972 .

[47]  Daniel Hardt,et al.  Verb phrase ellipsis: form, meaning, and processing , 1993 .

[48]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[49]  L Frazier,et al.  Constraint satisfaction as a theory of sentence processing , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[50]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Comprehension of Sluiced Sentences. , 1998 .

[51]  J. Henderson,et al.  Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences ☆ , 1991 .

[52]  Jason Merchant,et al.  Fragments and ellipsis , 2005 .

[53]  Uwe Reyle,et al.  From Discourse to Logic - Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory , 1993, Studies in linguistics and philosophy.

[54]  Randall Hendrick,et al.  ArticleThe representation and processing of coreference in discourse , 1998 .

[55]  Betty J. Birner,et al.  Information status and noncanonical word order in English , 1998 .

[56]  Stuart M. Shieber,et al.  Ellipsis and higher-order unification , 1991 .

[57]  K Carlson,et al.  The Effects of Parallelism and Prosody in the Processing of Gapping Structures , 2001, Language and speech.

[58]  Markus Bader,et al.  Prosodic Influences on Reading Syntactically Ambiguous Sentences , 1998 .

[59]  M. Gernsbacher.  Mechanisms that improve referential access , 1989, Cognition.

[60]  E. Engdahl,et al.  The linguistic realization of information packaging , 2013 .