The impact of legitimacy pressure and corporate profitability on green innovation: Evidence from China top 100

Abstract Green innovation is an important approach for achieving sustainable development. Most research on determinants of corporate green innovation has focused on either external or internal drivers. Combining institutional theory and resource-based view, the scientific value of this study lies in simultaneously exploring the influence of external legitimacy pressure and internal corporate profitability, and their interaction on green innovation. Samples of the top 100 listed companies in China, from 2008 to 2012, were used and the results demonstrated that legitimacy pressure from stakeholders has a significantly positive influence on both corporate green product innovation and process innovation. The results also revealed that corporate profitability positively affects green product innovation, while there was found to be no significant influence on green process innovation. Moreover, corporate profitability positively moderates the relationship between legitimacy pressure and green product innovation. The results show that not only the single factor of external legitimacy pressure and internal profitability, but also their interaction, affects corporate green innovation practices. This offers an integrating perspective on how corporations can be more innovative in sustainability.

[1]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[2]  D. Pujari,et al.  Mainstreaming Green Product Innovation: Why and How Companies Integrate Environmental Sustainability , 2010 .

[3]  L. Ning,et al.  Environmental Legitimacy, Green Innovation, and Corporate Carbon Disclosure: Evidence from CDP China 100 , 2018 .

[4]  W. Pan.  Akaike's Information Criterion in Generalized Estimating Equations , 2001, Biometrics.

[5]  Jiatao Li,et al.  CEO Hubris and Firm Risk Taking in China: The Moderating Role of Managerial Discretion , 2010 .

[6]  Bülent Sezen,et al.  Effects of Green Manufacturing and Eco-innovation on Sustainability Performance☆ , 2013 .

[7]  C. Garcés‐Ayerbe,et al.  Why do patterns of environmental response differ? A stakeholders' pressure approach , 2008 .

[8]  M. Toffel,et al.  Stakeholders and Environmental Management Practices: An Institutional Framework , 2004 .

[9]  B. Alrazi,et al.  A comprehensive literature review on, and the construction of a framework for, environmental legitimacy, accountability and proactivity , 2015 .

[10]  Paul A. Zandbergen,et al.  Ecologically Sustainable Organizations: An Institutional Approach , 1995 .

[11]  Catherine Pellegrino,et al.  Climate change accounting and the Australian mining industry: Exploring the links between corporate disclosure and the generation of legitimacy , 2012 .

[12]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[13]  W. Scott,et al.  A Multidimensional Model of Organizational Legitimacy: Hospital Survival in Changing Institutional Environments , 1998 .

[14]  Ching‐Hsun Chang.  The Influence of Corporate Environmental Ethics on Competitive Advantage: The Mediation Role of Green Innovation , 2011 .

[15]  R. Lozano.  A Holistic Perspective on Corporate Sustainability Drivers , 2015 .

[16]  D. Cormier,et al.  The Economic Relevance of Environmental Disclosure and its Impact on Corporate Legitimacy: An Empirical Investigation , 2015 .

[17]  Smita B. Brunnermeier,et al.  Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries , 2003 .

[18]  D. Bortree.  The impact of green initiatives on environmental legitimacy and admiration of the organization , 2009 .

[19]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of group interactions on structured populations: a review , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[20]  Yu-Shan Chen,et al.  Origins of green innovations: the differences between proactive and reactive green innovations , 2012 .

[21]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[22]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Coevolutionary Games - A Mini Review , 2009, Biosyst..

[23]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[24]  C. Herstatt,et al.  Green Innovation in Technology and Innovation Management – An Exploratory Literature Review , 2012 .

[25]  Vivian Yi-Ju Chen,et al.  Is environmental disclosure an effective strategy on establishment of environmental legitimacy for organization , 2013 .

[26]  Thomas J. Dean,et al.  Pollution Regulation as a Barrier to New Firm Entry: Initial Evidence and Implications for Future Research , 1995 .

[27]  Vivian W. Y. Tam,et al.  Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China , 2014 .

[28]  Xiao-xing Huang,et al.  The relationships between regulatory and customer pressure, green organizational responses, and green innovation performance , 2016 .

[29]  Juan Liu,et al.  Dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage: Evidence from China , 2014 .

[30]  Andrea Fosfuri,et al.  Necessity as the mother of ‘green’ inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations , 2013 .

[31]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  Iain J. Clelland,et al.  Talking Trash: Legitimacy, Impression Management, and Unsystematic Risk in the Context of the Natural Environment , 2004 .

[33]  Comparative statics of a monopolistic firm facing price-cap and command-and-control environmental regulations , 2014 .

[34]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[35]  Michael J. Lenox,et al.  The Strategic Use of Decentralized Institutions: Exploring Certification With the ISO 14001 Management Standard , 2005 .

[36]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  An empirical evaluation of environmental efficiencies and firm performance: Pollution prevention versus end-of-pipe practice , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[37]  María C. Cuerva,et al.  Drivers of green and non-green innovation: empirical evidence in Low-Tech SMEs , 2014 .

[38]  Daniel Kammerer,et al.  The effects of customer benefit and regulation on environmental product innovation. , 2009 .

[39]  D. Ding,et al.  The effect of institutional isomorphic pressure on the internationalization of firms in an emerging economy: evidence from China , 2013 .

[40]  Arjen van Witteloostuijn,et al.  From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research , 2010 .

[41]  William H. Glick,et al.  Common Methods Bias: Does Common Methods Variance Really Bias Results? , 1998 .

[42]  R. Grandinetti,et al.  Does the development of environmental innovation require different resources? Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms , 2015 .

[43]  Ki‐Hoon Lee,et al.  Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance , 2015 .

[44]  Walter Aerts,et al.  Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication , 2009 .

[45]  Javier Delgado-Ceballos,et al.  The Effect of Internal Barriers on the Connection Between Stakeholder Integration and Proactive Environmental Strategies , 2012 .

[46]  F. Roche,et al.  Green and competitive? An empirical test of the mediating role of environmental innovation strategy , 2008 .

[47]  Klaus Rennings,et al.  The Impact of Regulation-Driven Environmental Innovation on Innovation Success and Firm Performance , 2011 .

[48]  Julien Labonne,et al.  Why do manufacturing facilities introduce environmental management systems? Improving and/or signaling performance ☆ , 2009 .

[49]  V. Marchi.  ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND R&D COOPERATION: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM SPANISH MANUFACTURING FIRMS , 2012 .

[50]  J. E. Navas-López,et al.  Green corporate image: moderating the connection between environmental product innovation and firm performance , 2014 .

[51]  S. Zeng,et al.  Role of Internalization Process in Defining the Relationship between ISO 14001 Certification and Corporate Environmental Performance , 2012 .

[52]  K. Rennings.  Redefining innovation -- eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics , 2000 .

[53]  Daniel Kammerer,et al.  The effects of customer benefit and regulation on environmental product innovation.: Empirical evidence from appliance manufacturers in Germany , 2009 .

[54]  Yu‐Shan Chen,et al.  The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan , 2006 .

[55]  Rosa Maria Dangelico,et al.  From green product definitions and classifications to the Green Option Matrix , 2010 .

[56]  Eva Horváthová,et al.  The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: Short-term costs and long-term benefits? , 2012 .