Information theoretical approaches to chick-a-dee calls of Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis).

One aim of this study was to apply information theoretical analyses to understanding the structural complexity of chick-a-dee calls of Carolina chickadees, Poecile carolinensis. A second aim of this study was to compare this structural complexity to that of the calls of black-capped chickadees, P. atricapillus, described in an earlier published report (Hailman, Ficken, & Ficken, 1985). Chick-a-dee calls were recorded from Carolina chickadees in a naturalistic observation study in eastern Tennessee. Calls were analyzed using approaches from information theory, including transition probability matrices, Zipf's rules, entropies, and information coding capacities of calls and notes of calls. As described for black-capped chickadees, calls of Carolina chickadees exhibited considerable structural complexity. Most results suggested that the call of Carolina chickadees is more structurally complex than that of black-capped chickadees. These findings add support to the growing literature on the complexity of this call system in Paridae species. Furthermore, these results point to the feasibility of detailed cross-species comparative analyses that may allow strong testing of hypotheses regarding signal evolution.

[1]  D. M. Hutton,et al.  Coding and Redundancy: Man‐made and Animal‐evolved Signals , 2009 .

[2]  E. Wilson,et al.  Sociobiology: The New Synthesis , 1975 .

[3]  Philip Gaddis,et al.  A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE VOCAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS OF THE CAROLINA CHICKADEE AND THE TUFTED TITMOUSE , 1979 .

[4]  Todd M Freeberg,et al.  Receivers respond differently to chick-a-dee calls varying in note composition in Carolina chickadees, Poecile carolinensis , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  Jack Parker Hailman,et al.  Coding and Redundancy: Man-Made and Animal-Evolved Signals , 2008 .

[6]  Robin I. M. Dunbar.  Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language , 1996 .

[7]  D. Blumstein,et al.  Does Sociality Drive The Evolution Of Communicative Complexity? A Comparative Test With Ground‐Dwelling Sciurid Alarm Calls , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[8]  George A. Miller,et al.  Language and Communication , 1951 .

[9]  Jeffrey R. Lucas,et al.  “Information” and the chick-a-dee call: Communicating with a complex vocal system , 2007 .

[10]  Klaus Zuberbu Hler.  A syntactic rule in forest monkey communication , 2002 .

[11]  Mark T Nolen.  Multi-species mobbing assemblages: Behavioral asymmetries, vocal facilitation of social behavior, and the link of acoustic structure to function , 2010 .

[12]  Todd M. Freeberg,et al.  Complexity in the Chick-a-Dee Call of Carolina Chickadees (Poecile Carolinensis): Associations of Context and Signaler Behavior to Call Structure , 2008 .

[13]  Laurie L. Bloomfield,et al.  Note types and coding in parid vocalizations. III: The chick-a-dee call of the Carolina chickadee (Poecile carolinensis) , 2005 .

[14]  William J. Smith,et al.  The Behavior of Communicating: An Ethological Approach , 1980 .

[15]  Jack W. Bradbury,et al.  Principles of Animal Communication , 1998 .

[16]  Tibor Nemetz.  INFORMATION THEORY AND COMMUNICATION , 2011 .

[17]  E. Font,et al.  Putting information back into biological communication , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[18]  J. Hailman.  Optical Signals: Animal Communication and Light , 1977 .

[19]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[20]  Jack P. Hailman,et al.  Constraints on the Structure of Combinatorial “Chick-a-dee” Calls , 1987 .

[21]  D. H. Morse,et al.  Ecological Aspects of Some Mixed-Species Foraging Flocks of Birds , 1970 .

[22]  S. Nowicki,et al.  Vocal plasticity in captive black-capped chickadees: the acoustic basis and rate of call convergence , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  Christopher B Sturdy,et al.  Note types and coding in Parid vocalizations: the chick-a-dee call of the chestnut-backed chickadee (Poecile rufuscens). , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  James Gleick,et al.  The Information: A History, A Theory, A Flood , 2011, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[25]  Dorothy L. Mammen,et al.  Individual differences and within-flock convergence in chickadee calls , 1981, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[26]  K. Zuberbühler,et al.  Campbell's monkeys concatenate vocalizations into context-specific call sequences , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  G. Ritchison,et al.  ‘Chick-a-dee’ calls of Carolina chickadees convey information about degree of threat posed by avian predators , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  Klaus Zuberbühler,et al.  Predator-deterring alarm call sequences in Guereza colobus monkeys are meaningful to conspecifics , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  George Kingsley Zipf,et al.  The Unity of Nature, Least-Action, and Natural Social Science , 1942 .

[30]  Jack P. Hailman,et al.  Combinatorial animal communication with computable syntax: Chick-a-dee calling qualifies as ‘Language’ by structural linguistics , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  Clive K. Catchpole,et al.  Bird song: Biological themes and variations, 2nd ed. , 2008 .

[32]  Todd M Freeberg,et al.  Variation in chick-a-dee calls of a Carolina chickadee population, Poecile carolinensis: identity and redundancy within note types. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  J. L. Martin,et al.  Lower Predation Risk for Migratory Birds at High Latitudes , 2010, Science.

[34]  S. Haftorn.  CONTEXTS AND POSSIBLE FUNCTIONS OF ALARM CALLING IN THE WILLOW TIT, PARUS MONTANUS; THE PRINCIPLE OF ‘BETTER SAFE THAN SORRY’ , 2000 .

[35]  S. Semple,et al.  Coevolution of vocal communication and sociality in primates , 2005, Biology Letters.

[36]  D. Kroodsma,et al.  Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds , 1997 .

[37]  Laurie L. Bloomfield,et al.  Note types and coding in parid vocalizations. II: The chick-a-dee call of the mountain chickadee (Poecile gambeli) , 2004 .

[38]  Ken A. Otter,et al.  The ecology and behavior of chickadees and titmice : an integrated approach , 2007 .

[39]  T. Freeberg.  Social Complexity Can Drive Vocal Complexity , 2006, Psychological science.

[40]  J. Krebs,et al.  Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach , 1978 .

[41]  Donald R. Powers,et al.  BLUE-THROATED HUMMINGBIRD SONG: A PINNACLE OF NONOSCINE VOCALIZATIONS , 2000 .

[42]  R. Dawkins,et al.  Animal signals: information or manipulation? , 1978 .

[43]  P. Marler.  Chapter 5 – Bird calls: a cornucopia for communication , 2004 .

[44]  DAVID MILLER,et al.  Information and Communication , 1966, Nature.

[45]  Robin I. M. Dunbar.  Social Brain Hypothesis , 1998, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[46]  Thomas R. Nilsen.  On defining communication , 1957 .

[47]  J. P. Hailman,et al.  The organization of major vocalizations in the paridae , 1989 .

[48]  Laurie L. Bloomfield,et al.  Chickadee vocal production and perception: An integrative approach to understanding acoustic communication , 2007 .

[49]  Laurie L. Bloomfield,et al.  Note types and coding in parid vocalizations. I: The chick-a-dee call of the black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus) , 2004 .

[50]  Jessica L Owens,et al.  Variation in chick-a-dee calls of tufted titmice, Baeolophus bicolor: note type and individual distinctiveness. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[51]  Jack P. Hailman.  CONSTRAINED PERMUTATION IN “CHICK-A-DEE”-LIKE CALLS OF A BLACK-LORED TIT PARUS XANTHOGENYS , 1994 .

[52]  P. Marler,et al.  Nature's Music: The Science of Birdsong , 2004 .

[53]  Jack P. Hailman,et al.  DO THE SIBERIAN TITS PARUS CINCTUS IN SCANDINAVIA AND SIBERIA SPEAK THE SAME LANGUAGE , 1997 .

[54]  George Kingsley Zipf,et al.  Human behavior and the principle of least effort , 1949 .

[55]  Susan M. Smith.  The Black-Capped Chickadee: Behavioral Ecology and Natural History , 1992 .

[56]  Klaus Zuberbühler,et al.  The central importance of information in studies of animal communication , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[57]  Erick Greene,et al.  Allometry of Alarm Calls: Black-Capped Chickadees Encode Information About Predator Size , 2005, Science.

[58]  J. W. Johnston,et al.  Advances in Chemoreception , 1970 .

[59]  Todd M. Freeberg,et al.  Predator stimuli and calling behavior of Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis), tufted titmice (Baeolophus bicolor), and white-breasted nuthatches (Sitta carolinensis) , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[60]  Jeffrey R. Lucas,et al.  Asymmetries in mobbing behaviour and correlated intensity during predator mobbing by nuthatches, chickadees and titmice , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[61]  K. Zuberbühler.  A syntactic rule in forest monkey communication , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[62]  George Kingsley Zipf,et al.  CHILDREN'S SPEECH. , 1942, Science.

[63]  Jeffrey R. Lucas,et al.  Chick-a-dee call syntax, social context, and season affect vocal responses of Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis) , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[64]  Svein Haftorn.  Ontogeny of the vocal repertoire in the Willow Tit Parus montanus , 1993 .

[65]  S. Nowicki,et al.  Flock-specific recognition of chickadee calls , 1983, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[66]  Susan T. Smith.  Communication and other social behavior in Parus carolinensis , 1972 .

[67]  April M. Becker,et al.  MOBBING CALLS OF BLACK-CAPPED CHICKADEES: EFFECTS OF URGENCY ON CALL PRODUCTION , 2002 .

[68]  D. G. Moulton.  Communication by Chemical Signals , 1968, Science.

[69]  Hilde Vervaecke,et al.  Measuring and testing the steepness of dominance hierarchies , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[70]  P. Slater,et al.  Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations , 1995 .

[71]  Todd M. Freeberg,et al.  Chick-a-dee call variation in Carolina chickadees and recruiting flockmates to food , 2009 .

[72]  Philip K Gaddis,et al.  STRUCTURE AND VARIABILITY IN THE VOCAL REPERTOIRE OF THE MOUNTAIN CHICKADEE , 1985 .

[73]  S. Baird,et al.  The birds of North America , 1974 .

[74]  K. Wells.  Animal Vocal Communication: A New Approach , 1999 .

[75]  Jack P. Hailman,et al.  The chick-a-dee call system of the Mexican chickadee , 1994 .

[76]  M. Ryan,et al.  What do animal signals mean? , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[77]  J. Hailman,et al.  The ‘chick-a-dee’ calls of Parus atricapillus: A recombinant system of animal communication compared with written English , 1985 .

[78]  K. Zuberbühler,et al.  Campbell's Monkeys Use Affixation to Alter Call Meaning , 2009, PloS one.

[79]  R. Berwick,et al.  Songs to syntax: the linguistics of birdsong , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[80]  E. Robinson.  Cybernetics, or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine , 1963 .

[81]  R G Weisman,et al.  Call-note discriminations in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus). , 2000, Journal of comparative psychology.

[82]  G. Zipf,et al.  The Psycho-Biology of Language , 1936 .