The Impact of Introducing Full Field Digital Mammography into a Screening Programme

As digital mammography has largely replaced analogue mammography for screening, we examine the impact of the change on clinical outcomes. Data were obtained for 62,599 women undergoing routine screening mammography between January 2010 and March 2012 during the transition from analogue to digital screening, and on a monthly basis for the two years following complete conversion to digital mammography. With digital mammography, the recall rate increased from 3.58% to 4.69% (p<0.001) and the biopsy/cytology referral rate increased from 1.49% to 1.88% (p=0.01) whilst the cancer detection rate did not change significantly. The recall rate showed a strong positive correlation with time (r=0.71, p<0.001) and biopsy rate showed a moderate positive correlation (r=0.52 p=0.011). The cancer detection rate showed a moderate negative correlation with time (r=-0.567 p=0.05). Whilst all the outcome measures reported meet the standards set by the national screening programme, these results indicate a need for regular monitoring following changes to screening technology.

[1]  P. Skaane Studies comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer screening: Updated review , 2009, Acta radiologica.

[2]  Stefano Ciatto,et al.  Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital Versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Current status of full-field digital mammography. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[5]  Fred S Vernacchia,et al.  Digital mammography: its impact on recall rates and cancer detection rates in a small community-based radiology practice. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Constantine Gatsonis,et al.  Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  P. Skaane,et al.  Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County Study , 2007, European Radiology.

[8]  I H R Hauge,et al.  Patient doses from screen-film and full-field digital mammography in a population-based screening programme. , 2012, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[9]  Dione M Farria,et al.  Effect of transition to digital mammography on clinical outcomes. , 2011, Radiology.

[10]  D G Altman,et al.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.