Remarks on Nominalization
暂无分享,去创建一个
In his introductory comments to this volume, Chomsky reviews the historical background surrounding the emergence of Remarks on Nominalization, the restrictive view of the syntax which it promoted, and, in that context, the need to separate syntactically predictable constructions, such as gerunds from less predictable formations, and specifically derived nominals, as described in Lees’ (1960) seminal study. It is also in that context that Chomsky reviews the emergence of the X’-scheme, offering, in particular, a contemporary perspective on its merits and drawbacks. <82>
[1] John Robert Ross,et al. Constraints on variables in syntax , 1967 .
[2] Peter Steven Rosenbaum,et al. The grammar of English predicate complement constructions , 1967 .
[3] P. Postal,et al. Linguistic science and logic , 1966 .
[4] George Lakoff,et al. On The Nature Of Syntactic Irregularity , 1965 .