Can we trust untargeted metabolomics? Results of the metabo-ring initiative, a large-scale, multi-instrument inter-laboratory study

The metabo-ring initiative brought together five nuclear magnetic resonance instruments (NMR) and 11 different mass spectrometers with the objective of assessing the reliability of untargeted metabolomics approaches in obtaining comparable metabolomics profiles. This was estimated by measuring the proportion of common spectral information extracted from the different LCMS and NMR platforms. Biological samples obtained from 2 different conditions were analysed by the partners using their own in-house protocols. Test #1 examined urine samples from adult volunteers either spiked or not spiked with 32 metabolite standards. Test #2 involved a low biological contrast situation comparing the plasma of rats fed a diet either supplemented or not with vitamin D. The spectral information from each instrument was assembled into separate statistical blocks. Correlations between blocks (e.g., instruments) were examined (RV coefficients) along with the structure of the common spectral information (common components and specific weights analysis). In addition, in Test #1, an outlier individual was blindly introduced, and its identification by the various platforms was evaluated. Despite large differences in the number of spectral features produced after post-processing and the heterogeneity of the analytical conditions and the data treatment, the spectral information both within (NMR and LCMS) and across methods (NMR vs. LCMS) was highly convergent (from 64 to 91 % on average). No effect of the LCMS instrumentation (TOF, QTOF, LTQ-Orbitrap) was noted. The outlier individual was best detected and characterised by LCMS instruments. In conclusion, untargeted metabolomics analyses report consistent information within and across instruments of various technologies, even without prior standardisation.

[1]  D. Jouan-Rimbaud Bouveresse,et al.  Identification of significant factors by an extension of ANOVA-PCA based on multi-block analysis , 2011 .

[2]  Oliver Fiehn,et al.  Mass-spectrometry-based metabolomics: limitations and recommendations for future progress with particular focus on nutrition research , 2009, Metabolomics.

[3]  J. Kister,et al.  Development of near infrared sensors: detection of influential factors by the AComDim method. , 2010, Analytica chimica acta.

[4]  Nigel W. Hardy,et al.  Proposed minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis , 2007, Metabolomics.

[5]  Dominique Bertrand,et al.  Common components and specific weights analysis: A chemometric method for dealing with complexity of food products , 2006 .

[6]  J. Adams,et al.  Update in vitamin D. , 2010, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[7]  Michael Milburn,et al.  A Novel Fasting Blood Test for Insulin Resistance and Prediabetes , 2013, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[8]  Steffen Neumann,et al.  Highly sensitive feature detection for high resolution LC/MS , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[9]  Tim Robert,et al.  Normalization of urinary drug concentrations with specific gravity and creatinine. , 2009, Journal of analytical toxicology.

[10]  Nigel W. Hardy,et al.  Proposed reporting requirements for the description of NMR-based metabolomics experiments , 2007, Metabolomics.

[11]  Rasmus Bro,et al.  Multi‐way models for sensory profiling data , 2008 .

[12]  K. Robards,et al.  Metabolomics: The greatest omics of them all? , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[13]  Y. Escoufier LE TRAITEMENT DES VARIABLES VECTORIELLES , 1973 .

[14]  Ian J. Brown,et al.  Human metabolic phenotype diversity and its association with diet and blood pressure , 2008, Nature.

[15]  Christophe Cordella SAISIR: an open source toolbox for chemometrics in the Matlab, Scilab and Octave environments (CD-ROM) , 2010 .

[16]  Tom Fearn,et al.  Orthogonal Signal Correction , 1999 .

[17]  A. B. Robinson,et al.  Quantitative analysis of urine vapor and breath by gas-liquid partition chromatography. , 1971, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  T. Skov,et al.  The Effect of LC-MS Data Preprocessing Methods on the Selection of Plasma Biomarkers in Fed vs. Fasted Rats , 2012, Metabolites.

[19]  Charles Darwin,et al.  Experiments , 1800, The Medical and physical journal.

[20]  Jean-Luc Wolfender,et al.  Ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for plant metabolomics: a systematic comparison of high-resolution quadrupole-time-of-flight and single stage Orbitrap mass spectrometers. , 2013, Journal of chromatography. A.

[21]  Andrew C Johnson,et al.  A model to estimate influent and effluent concentrations of estradiol, estrone, and ethinylestradiol at sewage treatment works. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Brian J. Bennett,et al.  Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease , 2011, Nature.

[23]  Christian Gieger,et al.  Metabolic Footprint of Diabetes: A Multiplatform Metabolomics Study in an Epidemiological Setting , 2010, PloS one.

[24]  Estelle Pujos-Guillot,et al.  Development and validation of a UPLC/MS method for a nutritional metabolomic study of human plasma , 2010, Metabolomics.

[25]  El Mostafa Qannari,et al.  Chemometric methods for the coupling of spectroscopic techniques and for the extraction of the relevant information contained in the spectral data tables , 2002 .

[26]  Mark R Viant,et al.  International NMR-based environmental metabolomics intercomparison exercise. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  Rupasri Mandal,et al.  Multi-platform characterization of the human cerebrospinal fluid metabolome: a comprehensive and quantitative update , 2012, Genome Medicine.

[28]  I. Wilson,et al.  Does the mass spectrometer define the marker? A comparison of global metabolite profiling data generated simultaneously via UPLC-MS on two different mass spectrometers. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[29]  R. Abagyan,et al.  XCMS: processing mass spectrometry data for metabolite profiling using nonlinear peak alignment, matching, and identification. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[30]  John M. Baker,et al.  An inter-laboratory comparison demonstrates that [1H]-NMR metabolite fingerprinting is a robust technique for collaborative plant metabolomic data collection , 2010, Metabolomics.

[31]  M. Urpi-Sardà,et al.  Comparative analysis of sample preparation methods to handle the complexity of the blood fluid metabolome: when less is more. , 2013, Analytical chemistry.

[32]  Royston Goodacre,et al.  Inter-laboratory reproducibility of fast gas chromatography–electron impact–time of flight mass spectrometry (GC–EI–TOF/MS) based plant metabolomics , 2009, Metabolomics.

[33]  Daniel R. Weinberger,et al.  2020 visions , 2020, Nature.

[34]  Zhentao Zhang,et al.  Serum metabolite profiles and target tissue gene expression define the effect of cholecalciferol intake on calcium metabolism in rats and mice. , 2008, The Journal of nutrition.

[35]  Johan Trygg,et al.  Chemometrics in metabonomics. , 2007, Journal of proteome research.

[36]  El Mostafa Qannari,et al.  Defining the underlying sensory dimensions , 2000 .

[37]  G. Siuzdak,et al.  Solvent-dependent metabolite distribution, clustering, and protein extraction for serum profiling with mass spectrometry. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[38]  Alexander Amberg,et al.  Intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility of ultra performance liquid chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry for urinary metabolic profiling. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[39]  Nigel W. Hardy,et al.  Summary recommendations for standardization and reporting of metabolic analyses , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[40]  I. Wilson,et al.  A combined (1)H NMR and HPLC-MS-based metabonomic study of urine from obese (fa/fa) Zucker and normal Wistar-derived rats. , 2005, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[41]  Leo L. Cheng,et al.  Standard reporting requirements for biological samples in metabolomics experiments: mammalian/in vivo experiments , 2007, Metabolomics.

[42]  Age K. Smilde,et al.  Real-life metabolomics data analysis : how to deal with complex data ? , 2010 .

[43]  Nigel W. Hardy,et al.  Establishing reporting standards for metabolomic and metabonomic studies: a call for participation. , 2006, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[44]  M McKee,et al.  2020 Vision , 1998 .

[45]  R. A. van den Berg,et al.  Centering, scaling, and transformations: improving the biological information content of metabolomics data , 2006, BMC Genomics.

[46]  S. Wold,et al.  Orthogonal projections to latent structures (O‐PLS) , 2002 .

[47]  Joshua D. Knowles,et al.  Procedures for large-scale metabolic profiling of serum and plasma using gas chromatography and liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry , 2011, Nature Protocols.

[48]  P. Shannon,et al.  Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. , 2003, Genome research.

[49]  Robert Sabatier,et al.  The ACT (STATIS method) , 1994 .