Large-Scale Continuous Mobility Monitoring of Parkinson's Disease Patients Using Smartphones

Smartphone-based assessments have been considered a potential solution for continuously monitoring gait and mobility in mild to moderate Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients. Forty-four PD patients from cohorts 4 to 6 of the Multiple Ascending Dose (MAD) study of PRX002/RG7935 and thirty-five age- and gender-matched healthy individuals (i.e. healthy controls - HC) in a separate study performed smartphone-based assessments for up to 24 weeks and up to 6 weeks, respectively. The assessments included “active gait tests”, where all participants were asked to walk for 30 s with at least one 180\(^\circ \) turn, and “passive monitoring”, in which subjects carried the smartphone in a pocket or fanny pack as part of their daily routine. In total, over 6,600 active gait tests and over 30,000 h of passive monitoring data were collected. A mobility analysis indicates that patients with PD are less mobile than HCs, as manifested in time spent in gait-related activities, number of turns and sit-to-stand transitions, and power per step. It supports the potential use of smartphones for continuous mobility monitoring in future clinical practice and drug development.

[1]  A. Stiggelbout,et al.  Systematic evaluation of rating scales for impairment and disability in Parkinson's disease , 2002, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[2]  Gert S. Faber,et al.  Algorithm for Turning Detection and Analysis Validated under Home-Like Conditions in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease and Older Adults using a 6 Degree-of-Freedom Inertial Measurement Unit at the Lower Back , 2017, Front. Neurol..

[3]  Daniel Roggen,et al.  Deep Convolutional and LSTM Recurrent Neural Networks for Multimodal Wearable Activity Recognition , 2016, Sensors.

[4]  Wiebren Zijlstra,et al.  Trunk-acceleration based assessment of gait parameters in older persons: a comparison of reliability and validity of four inverted pendulum based estimations. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[5]  Alan Godfrey,et al.  The association between retirement and age on physical activity in older adults. , 2014, Age and ageing.

[6]  Anshul Rai,et al.  Zee: zero-effort crowdsourcing for indoor localization , 2012, Mobicom '12.

[7]  Rafael C González,et al.  Real-time gait event detection for normal subjects from lower trunk accelerations. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[8]  B. Galna,et al.  Free-living gait characteristics in ageing and Parkinson’s disease: impact of environment and ambulatory bout length , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[9]  Gary M. Weiss,et al.  The Impact of Personalization on Smartphone-Based Activity Recognition , 2012, AAAI 2012.

[10]  Mahmoud El-Gohary,et al.  Continuous monitoring of turning in Parkinson's disease: Rehabilitation potential. , 2015, NeuroRehabilitation.

[11]  Sean Pearson,et al.  Continuous Monitoring of Turning in Patients with Movement Disability , 2013, Sensors.

[12]  A Ashburn,et al.  Dysfunctional turning in Parkinson's disease , 2008, Disability and rehabilitation.

[13]  M. Mancini,et al.  Sit-stand and stand-sit transitions in older adults and patients with Parkinson’s disease: event detection based on motion sensors versus force plates , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[14]  Myeong-jin Lee,et al.  Step Detection Robust against the Dynamics of Smartphones , 2015, Sensors.

[15]  Mikkel Baun Kjærgaard,et al.  Smart Devices are Different: Assessing and MitigatingMobile Sensing Heterogeneities for Activity Recognition , 2015, SenSys.