The modality-specific and -nonspecific components of long-term priming are frequency sensitive

Five experiments were carried out to test the claim that the modality-specific and modality-nonspecific components of long-term priming are differentially sensitive to word frequency, with the specific component being less affected. In contrast with this claim, specific and nonspecific priming were similarly reduced for high-frequency words in three lexical decision and two perceptual identification experiments. These findings highlight the important role of frequency in modulating priming as well as provide a basic constraint for future theories of priming. In addition, the roles of task and student population in modulating priming are examined.

[1]  J. Bowers,et al.  Does implicit memory extend to legal and illegal nonwords? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Is Lexical Processing just an “ACT”? , 2019, Theories of Memory.

[3]  H. Roediger,et al.  Direct comparison of four implicit memory tests. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  Kim Kirsner,et al.  Domain-specific resources in word recognition , 1989 .

[5]  K. Forster,et al.  REPETITION PRIMING AND FREQUENCY ATTENUATION IN LEXICAL ACCESS , 1984 .

[6]  H L Roediger,et al.  Implicit memory. Retention without remembering. , 1990, The American psychologist.

[7]  H. Roediger,et al.  Direct comparison of two implicit memory tests: word fragment and word stem completion. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  J. H. Neely,et al.  A dissociative word-frequency X levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[9]  Jeffrey S. Bowers,et al.  In defense of abstractionist theories of repetition priming and word identification , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  J. Bowers Different perceptual codes support priming for words and pseudowords: was Morton right all along? , 1996 .

[11]  D. Schacter Perceptual Representation Systems and Implicit Memory , 1990, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[13]  D Milech,et al.  Common and modality-specific processes in the mental lexicon , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[14]  J. Grainger,et al.  Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: effects of relative prime-target frequency. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  T. Blaxton Dissociations among memory measures in memory-impaired subjects: Evidence for a processing account of memory , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[16]  G. Logan Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanisms? , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  J. Grainger,et al.  Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: effects of relative prime-target frequency. , 1990 .

[18]  Michael E. J. Masson,et al.  Identification of typographically transformed words: instance-based skill acquisition. , 1986 .

[19]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[20]  S. Joordens,et al.  The long and short of semantic priming effects in lexical decision. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  A. Ostergaard,et al.  The effects on priming of word frequency, number of repetitions, and delay depend on the magnitude of priming , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[22]  J. Bowers,et al.  Different perceptual codes support priming for words and pseudowords: was Morton right all along? , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Jeffrey S. Bowers,et al.  An investigation into the structure and acquisition of orthographic knowledge: Evidence from cross-script Kanji-Hiragana priming , 1998 .

[24]  L. Squire CHAPTER 7 – Memory and the Brain* , 1986 .

[25]  Lawrence Freedman,et al.  Fluent identification of repeated words. , 1990 .

[26]  L. Jacoby,et al.  On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  J. Morton,et al.  Facilitation of auditory word recognition , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[28]  H. Roediger Implicit memory in normal human subjects , 1993 .

[29]  J. Bowers,et al.  Orthographic, phonological, and articulatory contributions to masked letter and word priming. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  John Morton,et al.  Facilitation in Word Recognition: Experiments Causing Change in the Logogen Model , 1979 .

[31]  E Tulving,et al.  Priming and human memory systems. , 1990, Science.

[32]  R. Zajonc Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[33]  D Milech,et al.  Word and picture identification: Is representational parsimony possible? , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[34]  Jeffrey S. Bowers,et al.  Priming Is Not All Bias : Commentary on Ratcliff and McKoon ( 1997 ) , 1999 .

[35]  M Moscovitch,et al.  Contributions of surface and conceptual information to performance on implicit and explicit memory tasks. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.