A Method for the Analysis of Hierarchical Dependencies between Items of a Questionnaire

This paper describes a method of explorative data analysis which allows to detect logical implications between items of a dichotomous questionnaire or test. These logical dependencies are organized to form a hierarchical structure (quasi-order) on the items. Our analysis method, which is called Inductive Item Tree Analysis, can be seen as a method of Boolean analysis. We discuss the relation of our method to other methods of Boolean analysis and to related methods of data analysis, like for example Guttman scaling and latent class analysis. The adequacy of our analysis method is tested in a simulation study. The results of this study show that the method is able to detect existing dependencies with high accuracy if enough data are available. We apply our method to some real data sets to demonstrate the advantages of an analysis of logical implications.

[1]  Petr Hájek,et al.  On Generation of Inductive Hypotheses , 1977, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[2]  Jean-Claude Falmagne,et al.  Spaces for the Assessment of Knowledge , 1985, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[3]  Dietrich Albert,et al.  Construction of Knowledge Spaces for Problem Solving in Chess , 1994 .

[4]  T. Havránek,et al.  Mechanizing Hypothesis Formation: Mathematical Foundations for a General Theory , 1978 .

[5]  Heikki Mannila,et al.  Finding interesting rules from large sets of discovered association rules , 1994, CIKM '94.

[6]  Bernhard Ganter,et al.  Formale Begriffsanalyse - mathematische Grundlagen , 1996 .

[7]  David J. Krus,et al.  An Ordering-Theoretic Method to Determine Hierarchies Among Items , 1971 .

[8]  Claude Flament,et al.  L'analyse booléenne de questionnaires , 1976 .

[9]  J. Rost,et al.  Applications of Latent Trait and Latent Class Models in the Social Sciences , 1998 .

[10]  H. Feger.  Configuration Frequency Analysis and Feature Pattern Analysis: Some Comparative Observations , 2000 .

[11]  Karl Rihaczek,et al.  1. WHAT IS DATA MINING? , 2019, Data Mining for the Social Sciences.

[12]  Jean-Claude Falmagne,et al.  Knowledge spaces , 1998 .

[13]  Joseph M. Scandura,et al.  Deterministic Theorizing in Structural Learning: Three Levels of Empiricism. , 1971 .

[14]  Hannu Toivonen,et al.  Sampling Large Databases for Association Rules , 1996, VLDB.

[15]  J. Vermunt.  Latent Class Models , 2004 .

[16]  L. Guttman.  A basis for scaling qualitative data. , 1944 .

[17]  Peter W. Airasian,et al.  Determination of the Ordering Among Seven Piagetian Tasks by an Ordering-Theoretic Method. , 1974 .

[18]  Gerhard H. Fischer,et al.  "Contributions to Mathematical Psychology, Psychometrics, and Methodology" , 1993 .

[19]  K. Tatsuoka.  RULE SPACE: AN APPROACH FOR DEALING WITH MISCONCEPTIONS BASED ON ITEM RESPONSE THEORY , 1983 .

[20]  Rudi Janssens,et al.  A Boolean approach to the measurement of group processes and attitudes: The concept of integration as an example , 1999 .

[21]  Peter Theuns,et al.  A Dichotomization Method for Boolean Analysis of Quantifiable Co-Occurrence Data , 1994 .

[22]  S. Chipman,et al.  Cognitively diagnostic assessment , 1995 .

[23]  Peter Theuns.  Building a knowledge space via Boolean analysis of co-occurrence data , 1998 .

[24]  Dietrich Albert,et al.  Knowledge Spaces: Theories, Empirical Research, and Applications , 1998 .