Social desirability bias in survey research on sustainable development in small firms: an exploratory analysis of survey mode effect

Survey methodology has become an increasingly popular weapon of choice in conducting research on the topic of environmental sustainability in the small firm context. However, conventional application of survey research in many empirical studies tends to ignore the inherent issues associated with the mode of administration of survey questionnaires. One of these issues is social desirability bias (SDB) arising from survey modes such as face to face, the assisted type of survey questionnaire administration and mailed or purely self-administered survey. This study is an analysis of survey data generated by two modes: purely self-administered and survey enumerator assisted. The paper argues that the presence of an enumerator in the workplace or actual site of the business to administer the survey will motivate the respondents to provide more accurate information about the firms' environmental sustainability knowledge and practices. The article offers suggestions to address SDB in carrying out surveys about environmental sustainability in small firms.

[1]  Jyrki Niskanen,et al.  The objectivity of corporate environmental reporting: a study of Finnish listed firms' environmental disclosures , 2001 .

[2]  H. J. Arnold,et al.  The Role of Social-Desirability Response Bias in Turnover Research , 1985 .

[3]  Frank-Martin Belz,et al.  Marketing strategies in the age of sustainable development: Evidence from the food industry , 2009 .

[4]  Marcus Wagner,et al.  National culture, regulation and country interaction effects on the association of environmental management systems with environmentally beneficial innovation , 2009 .

[5]  Gregory L. Poe,et al.  A Comparison of Hypothetical Phone and Mail Contingent Valuation Responses for Green-Pricing Electricity Programs , 1997 .

[6]  Mark Cordano,et al.  How do Small and Medium Enterprises Go “Green”? A Study of Environmental Management Programs in the U.S. Wine Industry , 2010 .

[7]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[8]  F. Strack,et al.  The impact of administration mode on response effects in survey measurement , 1991 .

[9]  M. Frondel,et al.  End-of-Pipe or Cleaner Production? An Empirical Comparison of Environmental Innovation Decisions Across OECD Countries , 2007 .

[10]  Fred Luthans,et al.  Social Desirability Response Effects: Three Alternative Models , 1983 .

[11]  Harvey H. Millar,et al.  The Adoption of Sustainable Manufacturing Practices in the Caribbean , 2011 .

[12]  M. King,et al.  Social desirability bias: A neglected aspect of validity testing , 2000 .

[13]  Robert Gago,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND STRATEGIC POSITIONING OF SPANISH MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES , 2004 .

[14]  R. Handfield,et al.  Environmental Management Systems and Green Supply Chain Management: Complements for Sustainability? , 2008 .

[15]  Gary S. Monroe,et al.  Exploring Social Desirability Bias , 2003 .

[16]  Antonio Tencati,et al.  The impact of corporate social responsibility associations on trust in organic products marketed by mainstream retailers: a study of Italian consumers , 2010 .

[17]  Nuria E. Hurtado-Torres,et al.  Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: a resource-based perspective. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[18]  T. J. Gerpott,et al.  Determinants of price mark‐up tolerance for green electricity – lessons for environmental marketing strategies from a study of residential electricity customers in Germany , 2009 .

[19]  Joanne Meehan,et al.  Sustainable procurement practice , 2011 .

[20]  Chris Ryan,et al.  Business networks and the uptake of sustainability practices: the case of New Zealand , 2007 .

[21]  R. Groves.  Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys , 2006 .

[22]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research , 1991 .

[23]  Kelly B. Maguire,et al.  Does mode matter? A comparison of telephone, mail, and in-person treatments in contingent valuation surveys. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[24]  J. Merritt,et al.  EM into SME won't go? Attitudes, awareness and practices in the London Borough of Croydon , 1998 .

[25]  Terje I. Vaaland,et al.  Corporate social responsibility: investigating theory and research in the marketing context , 2008 .

[26]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  Different strokes: regulatory styles and environmental strategy in the North‐American oil and gas industry , 2001 .

[27]  Myung-Soo Jo,et al.  Controlling social-desirability bias via method factors of direct and indirect questioning in structural equation models , 2000 .

[28]  C. Carter,et al.  Sustainable supply chain management: Evolution and future directions , 2011 .

[29]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[30]  Louise Young,et al.  A Sensemaking Approach to Trade-Offs and Synergies Between Human and Ecological Elements of Corporate Sustainability , 2010 .

[31]  Corey Greenlaw,et al.  A Comparison of Web-Based and Paper-Based Survey Methods , 2009, Evaluation review.

[32]  Blanca Hernández,et al.  Environmental disclosures and compulsory accounting standards: the case of spanish annual reports , 2007 .

[33]  Nicholas J. Ashill,et al.  Economic Accountability in the Context of Local Governance in the Philippines: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach , 2009 .

[34]  Lorne Cummings,et al.  Managerial attitudes toward environmental management within Australia, the People's Republic of China and Indonesia , 2008 .

[35]  Louis Brennan,et al.  Environmental considerations within manufacturing strategy: an international study , 2007 .

[36]  Judith Petts,et al.  THE CLIMATE AND CULTURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE WITHIN SMEs , 1999 .

[37]  D. Gadenne,et al.  An Empirical Study of Environmental Awareness and Practices in SMEs , 2009 .

[38]  Lucie K. Ozanne,et al.  Consumer driven corporate environmentalism : fact or fiction? , 2010 .

[39]  J. Aragón-Correa,et al.  Environmental strategy and exports in medium, small and micro-enterprises , 2010 .

[40]  David Stokes,et al.  Small businesses and the environment: turning over a new leaf? , 2009 .

[41]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Social Desirability Bias in Contingent Valuation Surveys Administered Through In-Person Interviews , 2003, Land Economics.

[42]  Eva Collins,et al.  Sustainability practices: trends in New Zealand businesses , 2010 .

[43]  The biotechnology industry and strategies of biodiversity conservation: The influence of managerial interpretations and risk propensity , 1999 .

[44]  P. Cerin.  Characteristics of environmental reporters on the OM Stockholm exchange , 2002 .

[45]  Leonidas C. Leonidou,et al.  Research into environmental marketing/management: a bibliographic analysis , 2011 .

[46]  Robert D. Tortora,et al.  Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the Internet , 2009 .

[47]  Eran Feitelson,et al.  Factors Affecting Environmental Behavior in Micro-enterprises , 2007 .

[48]  S. Presser,et al.  Data collection mode and social desirability bias in self-reported religious attendance : Church attendance in the United States , 1998 .