Optimization of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography depending on clinical indication

Abstract. The objective is to optimize low-energy (LE) and high-energy (HE) exposure parameters of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) examinations in four different clinical applications for which different levels of average glandular dose (AGD) and ratios between LE and total doses are required. The optimization was performed on a Senographe DS with a SenoBright® upgrade. Simulations were performed to find the optima by maximizing the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) on the recombined CESM image using different targeted doses and LE image quality. The linearity between iodine concentration and CNR as well as the minimal detectable iodine concentration was assessed. The image quality of the LE image was assessed on the CDMAM contrast-detail phantom. Experiments confirmed the optima found on simulation. The CNR was higher for each clinical indication than for SenoBright®, including the screening indication for which the total AGD was 22% lower. Minimal iodine concentrations detectable in the case of a 3-mm-diameter round tumor were 12.5% lower than those obtained for the same dose in the clinical routine. LE image quality satisfied EUREF acceptable limits for threshold contrast. This newly optimized set of acquisition parameters allows increased contrast detectability compared to parameters currently used without a significant loss in LE image quality.

[1]  Roberto Orecchia,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[2]  A. Rose.  The sensitivity performance of the human eye on an absolute scale. , 1948, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[3]  S. Evans.  Catalogue of Diagnostic X-Ray Spectra and Other Data , 1998 .

[4]  Serge Muller,et al.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results , 2011, European Radiology.

[5]  R Birch,et al.  Computation of bremsstrahlung X-ray spectra and comparison with spectra measured with a Ge(Li) detector. , 1979, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  J. Brady,et al.  Estimation of compressed breast thickness during mammography. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  G. Barnes,et al.  Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography. , 1991, Radiology.

[8]  Nicolas Foray,et al.  DNA damage induced by mammography in high family risk patients: only one single view in screening. , 2012, Breast.

[9]  D. Salas,et al.  Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography. , 2001, Radiology.

[10]  G. C. E. Burger,et al.  Phantom tests with x-rays , 1950 .

[11]  Ann-Katherine Carton,et al.  A Virtual Human Breast Phantom Using Surface Meshes and Geometric Internal Structures , 2014, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[12]  Serge Muller,et al.  Dual-energy contrast enhanced digital mammography using a new approach for breast tissue canceling , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[13]  R Klausz,et al.  Dose to population as a metric in the design of optimised exposure control in digital mammography. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[14]  A E Burgess,et al.  The Rose model, revisited. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[15]  Janice S Sung,et al.  Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma. , 2013, Radiology.

[16]  S. Powell,et al.  Roles of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in homologous recombination, DNA replication fidelity and the cellular response to ionizing radiation , 2003, Oncogene.

[17]  Consumer Protection,et al.  European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition--summary document. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[18]  E. Sickles.  Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. , 1991, Radiology.

[19]  M A Helvie,et al.  Breast thickness in routine mammograms: effect on image quality and radiation dose. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.