Modeling the contrast-sensitivity functions of older adults.

To determine whether a parabolic template is a good description of the contrast-sensitivity functions (CSF's) exhibited by older adults, the curve-fitting method of Pelli et al. [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 3(13), P56 (1986)] was applied to contrast-sensitivity data from 100 older subjects (ages 53-85 years). Although the method resulted in reasonable fits for most subjects, closer inspection revealed that this technique may be problematic. A significant number of observers had functions that were nonparabolic, and for many subjects the error tended to be concentrated at the peak of the CSF. In addition, in contrast to the study of Pelli et al., the peak contrast sensitivities of the subjects were only weakly related to Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity and letter acuity. The data were also fitted with an asymmetric function of variable shape. Whereas this function provided a better fit to the nonparabolic CSF's, it resulted in inferior fits to most of the remaining data. These results demonstrate that the spatial CSF's of older adults cannot be described by a single parametric curve such as a parabola or a function of an exponential and that Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity and letter acuity are not adequate predictors of their peak contrast sensitivities.

[1]  M. Bullimore,et al.  Improving the Reliability of the Pelli-Robson Contrast Sensitivity Test , 1991, Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System.

[2]  D. Uhlrich,et al.  Cross-species correspondence of spatial contrast sensitivity functions , 1981, Behavioural Brain Research.

[3]  A Atkin,et al.  Abnormalities of central contrast sensitivity in glaucoma. , 1979, American journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  H. Wilson,et al.  Threshold visibility of frequency gradient patterns , 1977, Vision Research.

[5]  G. Rubin RELIABILITY AND SENSITIVITY OF CLINICAL CONTRAST SENSITIVITY TESTS , 1988 .

[6]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  THE DESIGN OF A NEW LETTER CHART FOR MEASURING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY , 1988 .

[7]  F. Campbell,et al.  Visibility of aperiodic patterns compared with that of sinusoidal gratings , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  J. Robson,et al.  Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field , 1981, Vision Research.

[9]  K E Higgins,et al.  Spatial contrast sensitivity: effects of age, test-retest, and psychophysical method. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  R. Hess,et al.  Vision through cataracts. , 1978, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[11]  U. Tulunay-Keesey,et al.  Threshold and suprathreshold spatiotemporal response throughout adulthood. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[12]  D. G. Green,et al.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Visual changes in daily life throughout adulthood. , 1988, Journal of gerontology.

[14]  C. A. Burbeck,et al.  Spatiotemporal characteristics of visual mechanisms: excitatory-inhibitory model. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[15]  Richard Peterson,et al.  The Latest Data on Visual Disability from NCHS , 1979 .

[16]  F. Ferris,et al.  New visual acuity charts for clinical research. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood , 1982, Vision Research.

[18]  M. Banks,et al.  Model for hyperopia, myopia, and presbyopia, with suggested therapeutic remedies (A) , 1986 .

[19]  G. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading. VI—The role of contrast in low vision , 1989, Vision Research.

[20]  G Buchsbaum,et al.  Inference of global spatiochromatic mechanisms from contrast sensitivity functions. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  G Buchsbaum,et al.  Global spatiochromatic mechanism accounting for luminance variations in contrast sensitivity functions. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[22]  H. Wilson Quantitative prediction of line spread function measurements: Implications for channel bandwidths , 1978, Vision Research.

[23]  G. Rubin,et al.  Comparison of acuity, contrast sensitivity, and disability glare before and after cataract surgery. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.

[24]  D. H. Kelly Spatiotemporal variation of chromatic and achromatic contrast thresholds. , 1983, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[25]  J. Sjöstrand CONTRAST SENSITIVITY IN MACULAR DISEASE USING A SMALL‐FIELD AND A LARGE‐FIELD TV‐SYSTEM , 1979, Acta ophthalmologica.

[26]  D. H. Kelly Spatial frequency selectivity in the retina , 1975, Vision Research.

[27]  K. Ball,et al.  Visual attention problems as a predictor of vehicle crashes in older drivers. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  J. Movshon,et al.  Analysis of the development of spatial contrast sensitivity in monkey and human infants. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[29]  M. A. Bouman,et al.  Spatial Modulation Transfer in the Human Eye , 1967 .

[30]  I. Bailey,et al.  Visual Factors and Orientation‐Mobility Performance , 1982, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.