Vehicle-to-infrastructure communication-based adaptive traffic signal control

This study presents a method that combines travel-time estimation and adaptive traffic signal control. The proposed method explores the concept of vehicle-to-infrastructure communication, through which real-time vehicle localisation data become available to traffic controllers. This provides opportunity to frequently sample vehicle location and speed for online travel-time estimation. The control objective is to minimise travel time for vehicles in the system. The proposed method is based on approximate dynamic programming, which allows the controller to learn from its own performance progressively. The authors use micro-traffic simulation to evaluate the control performance against benchmark control methods in an idealistic environment, where errors in sampling vehicle location and speed are not considered. The results show that the proposed method outperforms benchmarking methods substantially and consistently.

[1]  Jean-Loup Farges,et al.  THE PRODYN REAL TIME TRAFFIC ALGORITHM , 1983 .

[2]  Chen Cai,et al.  APPROXIMATE DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING CONTROLLER FOR MULTIPLE INTERSECTIONS , 2010 .

[3]  J R Peirce,et al.  MOVA: the 20 site trial , 1990 .

[4]  Yang Wang,et al.  On the performance of adaptive traffic signal control , 2009, IWCTS '09.

[5]  Chen-Nee Chuah,et al.  VGrid: vehicular adhoc networking and computing grid for intelligent traffic control , 2005, 2005 IEEE 61st Vehicular Technology Conference.

[6]  Kiyohito Tokuda,et al.  Vehicle control algorithms for cooperative driving with automated vehicles and intervehicle communications , 2002, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[7]  Youngbin Yim,et al.  Travel Time Estimation on the San Francisco Bay Area Network Using Cellular Phones as Probes , 2000 .

[8]  Aleksandar Stevanovic,et al.  Field Evaluation of SCATS Traffic Control in Park City, UT , 2008 .

[9]  P. G. Gipps,et al.  A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation , 1981 .

[10]  R A Vincent,et al.  'MOVA': TRAFFIC RESPONSIVE, SELF-OPTIMISING SIGNAL CONTROL FOR ISOLATED INTERSECTIONS , 1988 .

[11]  Ben Waterson Quantifying the impact of probe vehicle localisation data errors on signalised junction control , 2012 .

[12]  David Bretherton SCOOT MC3 and Current Developments , 2007 .

[13]  Fangfang Zheng,et al.  Urban link travel time estimation based on sparse probe vehicle data , 2013 .

[14]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Learning to predict by the methods of temporal differences , 1988, Machine Learning.

[15]  R. B. Potts,et al.  Algorithm for Traffic Control , 1964 .

[16]  Steven I-Jy Chien,et al.  Dynamic Freeway Travel-Time Prediction with Probe Vehicle Data: Link Based Versus Path Based , 2001 .

[17]  Alexandre M. Bayen,et al.  Evaluation of traffic data obtained via GPS-enabled mobile phones: The Mobile Century field experiment , 2009 .

[18]  Ozan K. Tonguz,et al.  Self-organized traffic control , 2010, VANET '10.

[19]  Ben Waterson,et al.  An automated signalized junction controller that learns strategies from a human expert , 2012, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[20]  Nathan H. Gartner,et al.  OPAC: A DEMAND-RESPONSIVE STRATEGY FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROL , 1983 .

[21]  D I Robertson,et al.  User guide to TRANSYT version 6 , 1976 .

[22]  T. Sayed,et al.  Travel Time Estimation in an Urban Network Using Sparse Probe Vehicle Data and Historical Travel Time Relationships , 2009 .

[23]  F. Webster TRAFFIC SIGNAL SETTINGS , 1958 .

[24]  Vicente Milanés Montero,et al.  An Intelligent V2I-Based Traffic Management System , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[25]  Warren B. Powell,et al.  “Approximate dynamic programming: Solving the curses of dimensionality” by Warren B. Powell , 2007, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.