A multi-center effectiveness comparison study of fruquintinib with constructed external control cohort of other targeted kinase inhibitors using real-world data in third-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

Objective The objective of this study was to assess the comparative efficacy in third-line setting for metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients using matched population of FRESCO trial with fruquintinib and real-world data with other TKIs. Materials and methods The arm of fruquintinib from the FRESCO phase III trial (NCT02314819) included the data of patients with metastatic CRC that progressed after at least two lines of chemotherapy and received fruquintinib treatment. An external control arm was constructed using real-world data (RWD) of patients who received other TKIs based on key eligibility criteria of FRESCO. The baseline characteristics of two arms was balanced by propensity score matching (PSM). The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate progression free survival (PFS) and to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), respectively. Results Overall, 128 patients were successfully matched by PSM in each, fruquintinib and other TKIs group. The patients in fruquintinib group showed significant increase in median PFS than other TKIs (3.71 vs. 2.49 months, HR = 0.67, 95%CI, 0.48-0.94, p = 0.019). In the subgroup analysis, fruquintinib showed a significant benefit in PFS compared with other TKIs among patients undergoing two or three previous chemotherapy regimens (HR 0.58, 95%CI 0.40-0.84; p=0.004), with rectum as primary disease site (HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.31-0.87; p=0.013), with left sided primary tumor location (HR 0.62, 95%CI 0.42-0.90; p=0.011), with multiple metastasis sites (HR 0.68, 95%CI 0.48-0.97; p=0.034) and with lung metastasis (HR 0.65, 95%CI 0.43-0.98; p=0.042). Conclusion With the approach of establishing the external control arm from RWD, this study has demonstrated that treatment with fruquintinib significantly prolonged PFS as compared to other TKIs in patients as third-line mCRC treatment.

[1]  R. García-Carbonero,et al.  LBA25 FRESCO-2: A global phase III multiregional clinical trial (MRCT) evaluating the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer , 2022, Annals of Oncology.

[2]  N. Zhang,et al.  Real-World Data: Fruquintinib in Treating Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2022, Oncology research.

[3]  Junyan Zhang,et al.  Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Regorafenib and Fruquintinib in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-An Observational Cohort Study in the Real World. , 2022, Clinical colorectal cancer.

[4]  Yan Li,et al.  The best strategy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients in second-line treatment: A network meta-analysis. , 2021, Cancer treatment and research communications.

[5]  Yongkun Sun,et al.  The Real-World Practice of Fruquintinib for Chinese Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2021, Cancer management and research.

[6]  W. Wang,et al.  Mortality and years of life lost of colorectal cancer in China, 2005–2020: findings from the national mortality surveillance system , 2021, Chinese medical journal.

[7]  Yue Cai,et al.  Selection of Oral Therapeutics in China for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer , 2021, Current Treatment Options in Oncology.

[8]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries , 2021, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[9]  Ying Cheng,et al.  Subgroup analysis by prior anti-VEGF or anti-EGFR target therapy in FRESCO, a randomized, double-blind, Phase III tri1al. , 2020, Future oncology.

[10]  Yafei You,et al.  Previous Use of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Agents Decreases Efficacy of Fruquintinib in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies , 2020, Frontiers in Oncology.

[11]  Erratum: Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. , 2020, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[12]  Yinying Wu,et al.  Efficacy and safety of regorafenib as beyond second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: an adjusted indirect meta-analysis and systematic review , 2020, Therapeutic advances in medical oncology.

[13]  Mingyi Zhou,et al.  Comparison of efficacy and safety for patients with beyond second line treated metastatic colorectal cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2020, Journal of chemotherapy.

[14]  W. Fang,et al.  Treatment patterns and direct medical costs of metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a retrospective study of electronic medical records from urban China , 2020, Journal of medical economics.

[15]  L. Shen,et al.  Regorafenib, TAS-102, or fruquintinib for metastatic colorectal cancer: any difference in randomized trials? , 2019, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[16]  Jianxin Chen,et al.  Comparison of Regorafenib, Fruquintinib, and TAS-102 in Previously Treated Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Five Clinical Trials , 2019, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[17]  Zhou Rui,et al.  A comparison of regorafenib and fruquintinib for metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis , 2019, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[18]  Ying Cheng,et al.  Effect of Fruquintinib vs Placebo on Overall Survival in Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The FRESCO Randomized Clinical Trial , 2018, JAMA.

[19]  W. Fang,et al.  Treatment Patterns and Economic Burden of Chinese Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: a Retrospective Study of Electronic Medical Records from Urban China , 2018 .

[20]  Yumei Zhang,et al.  The current status of treatment for colorectal cancer in China , 2017, Medicine.

[21]  B. Barber,et al.  Characterizing medical care by disease phase in metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2011, Journal of oncology practice.

[22]  Xinghuan Wang,et al.  The impact of surgical treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia on male erectile function , 2016, Medicine.