Advancing Symptom Science Through Use of Common Data Elements.

BACKGROUND Use of common data elements (CDEs), conceptually defined as variables that are operationalized and measured in identical ways across studies, enables comparison of data across studies in ways that would otherwise be impossible. Although healthcare researchers are increasingly using CDEs, there has been little systematic use of CDEs for symptom science. CDEs are especially important in symptom science because people experience common symptoms across a broad range of health and developmental states, and symptom management interventions may have common outcomes across populations. PURPOSES The purposes of this article are to (a) recommend best practices for the use of CDEs for symptom science within and across centers; (b) evaluate the benefits and challenges associated with the use of CDEs for symptom science; (c) propose CDEs to be used in symptom science to serve as the basis for this emerging science; and (d) suggest implications and recommendations for future research and dissemination of CDEs for symptom science. DESIGN The National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)-supported P20 and P30 Center directors applied published best practices, expert advice, and the literature to identify CDEs to be used across the centers to measure pain, sleep, fatigue, and affective and cognitive symptoms. FINDINGS We generated a minimum set of CDEs to measure symptoms. CONCLUSIONS The CDEs identified through this process will be used across the NINR Centers and will facilitate comparison of symptoms across studies. We expect that additional symptom CDEs will be added and the list will be refined in future work. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Symptoms are an important focus of nursing care. Use of CDEs will facilitate research that will lead to better ways to assist people to manage their symptoms.

[1]  C. Pullen,et al.  Implementing common data elements across studies to advance research. , 2015, Nursing outlook.

[2]  M. Egan,et al.  Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor val66met Polymorphism Affects Human Memory-Related Hippocampal Activity and Predicts Memory Performance , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Annette DeVito Dabbs,et al.  Envisioning the future in symptom science. , 2014, Nursing outlook.

[4]  J. Jobe,et al.  Cognitive psychology and self-reports: Models and methods , 2003, Quality of Life Research.

[5]  C. Schwartz,et al.  Toward a theoretical model of quality-of-life appraisal: Implications of findings from studies of response shift , 2004, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[6]  E. Feskens,et al.  Ageing and the relationship between functional status and self-rated health in elderly men. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[7]  William Edward Hammond,et al.  Standardising clinical data elements , 2010, Int. J. Funct. Informatics Pers. Medicine.

[8]  M. Katz,et al.  Exercise and dietary change after diagnosis and cancer‐related symptoms in long‐term survivors of breast cancer: CALGB 79804 , 2009, Psycho-oncology.

[9]  C. Schwartz,et al.  Reconsidering the psychometrics of quality of life assessment in light of response shift and appraisal , 2004, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[10]  D. J. McCloskey,et al.  National Institute of Nursing Research Centers of Excellence: a logic model for sustainability, leveraging resources, and collaboration to accelerate cross-disciplinary science. , 2014, Nursing outlook.

[11]  J. Suls,et al.  Self‐attention, life stress, and illness: a prospective study. , 1985, Psychosomatic medicine.

[12]  Crystal Kallem,et al.  Demonstrating "collect once, use many"--assimilating public health secondary data use requirements into an existing Domain Analysis Model. , 2011, AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium.

[13]  Paul Landais,et al.  A methodology for a minimum data set for rare diseases to support national centers of excellence for healthcare and research , 2015, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[14]  P M Nadkarni,et al.  The Common Data Elements for Cancer Research: Remarks on Functions and Structure , 2006, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[15]  E Frank,et al.  Types of stressors that increase susceptibility to the common cold in healthy adults. , 1998, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[16]  George Hripcsak,et al.  Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research. , 2013, Medical care.

[17]  Charles Safran,et al.  Toward a national framework for the secondary use of health data: an American Medical Informatics Association White Paper. , 2007, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[18]  A. Stanton,et al.  Social comparison and adjustment to breast cancer: an experimental examination of upward affiliation and downward evaluation. , 1999, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[19]  D. Locker,et al.  Quality of life: a dynamic construct. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[20]  R. Herrmann,et al.  Quality of life as subjective experience: reframing of perception in patients with colon cancer undergoing radical resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) , 1999, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[21]  KathleenW. Wyrwich,et al.  Understanding global transition assessments , 2006, Quality of Life Research.

[22]  J. Jackson,et al.  Reconsidering the role of social disadvantage in physical and mental health: stressful life events, health behaviors, race, and depression. , 2010, American journal of epidemiology.

[23]  B. Knäuper,et al.  The eternal quest for optimal balance between maximizing pleasure and minimizing harm: the compensatory health beliefs model. , 2006, British journal of health psychology.