The use of quantitative ultrasound to monitor fracture healing: a feasibility study using phantoms.

Fracture healing has traditionally been monitored subjectively using manual manipulation of the fracture site and evaluation of radiographic images. A more objective method of monitoring would provide obvious advantages, allowing healing progress to be quantitatively assessed and so providing the opportunity for early detection of problems. A tibia phantom was used to investigate whether the longitudinal propagation velocity of ultrasound across a fracture site could be used quantitatively to assess fracture healing. The characteristic of fracture healing simulated by the phantom was the changing gap between the bone ends at the fracture site. The ultrasound velocity was measured using a recently developed machine, the SoundScan 2000 (Myriad Ultrasound Systems Ltd, Israel). The precision of the SoundScan 2000 was found to be 0.4% in vitro. Ultrasound velocity predicted the simulated fracture gap with a high degree of accuracy (R2 = 0.994). The measured and the theoretically calculated velocity for different widths between the simulated bone ends was found to be highly correlated with a coefficient of determination of 0.998. This result shows that the use of quantitative ultrasound to monitor fracture healing warrants further investigation in vivo.

[1]  G Van der Perre,et al.  The effect of fracture and fracture fixation on ultrasonic velocity and attenuation. , 1996, Physiological measurement.

[2]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Correlations of radiographic analysis of healing fractures with strength: A statistical analysis of experimental osteotomies , 1985, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[3]  G Van der Perre,et al.  Ultrasound velocity measurement in long bones: measurement method and simulation of ultrasound wave propagation. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  I. Siegel,et al.  The determination of fracture healing by measurement of sound velocity across the fracture site. , 1958, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[5]  James F. Greenleaf,et al.  Tissue characterization with ultrasound , 1986 .

[6]  Hyatt Gw,et al.  Ultrasonics and physical properties of healing bone. , 1972 .

[7]  M. V. van Holsbeeck,et al.  Ultrasound for the Early Diagnosis of Fracture Healing After Interlocking Nailing of the Tibia Without Reaming , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  G. van der Perre,et al.  Study of the vibrational behaviour of a healing tibia using finite element modelling. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  S. Cowin,et al.  On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  J Kenwright,et al.  Manual assessment of fracture stiffness. , 1996, Injury.

[11]  J L Cunningham,et al.  Biomechanical measurement of fracture healing. , 1990, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[12]  Y. Nakatsuchi,et al.  The vibrational mode of the tibia and assessment of bone union in experimental fracture healing using the impulse response method. , 1996, Medical engineering & physics.

[13]  C. Trevisan,et al.  Quantification by dual photonabsorptiometry of local bone loss after fracture. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  E. Chao,et al.  Noninvasive monitoring techniques for quantitative description of callus mineral content and mechanical properties. , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  J. Cunningham,et al.  Bone Mineral Changes During Tibial Fracture Healing , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  A Streda,et al.  Bone indexes and cortical thickness in assessing osteoporosis in rheumatic patients. , 1973, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[17]  J F Connolly,et al.  Quantitative roentgenographic densitometry for assessing fracture healing. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  M. Popovtzer,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia: a novel approach for assessment of bone status. , 1995, Bone.

[19]  G. W. C. Kaye,et al.  Tables of Physical and Chemical Constants , 2018 .

[20]  L. Claes,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Experimental Fracture Repair by Peripheral Computed Tomography , 1997, Calcified Tissue International.

[21]  C M Langton,et al.  A contact method for the assessment of ultrasonic velocity and broadband attenuation in cortical and cancellous bone. , 1990, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[22]  G. W. Hyatt,et al.  Ultrasonic study of normal and fractured bone. , 1975, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  J L Cunningham,et al.  Fracture stiffness measurement in the assessment and management of tibial fractures. , 1992, Clinical biomechanics.

[24]  Siffert Rs,et al.  Acoustic assessment of fracture healing. Capabilities and limitations of "a lost art". , 1996 .

[25]  J L Cunningham,et al.  Measuring stiffness can define healing of tibial fractures. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[26]  G Lowet,et al.  In vivo assessment of bone mechanical properties by vibration and ultrasonic wave propagation analysis. , 1996, Bone.