ALS Population Assessment of a Dynamic Stopping Algorithm Implementation for P300 Spellers

P300-based BCIs have been proposed as potential communication alternatives for individuals whose severe neuro-muscular limitations, e.g. due to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), preclude their use of most commercially available assistive technologies. However, BCIs are currently limited by their relatively slower selection rates due to the significant amount of data collection required to improve the signal-to- noise ratio (SNR) of the elicited brain responses to achieve desired system accuracy levels. The conventional strategy is to average over a fixed amount of data prior to BCI decision making, an approach that might be inefficient given the inherent variation in a user’s responses during BCI use. There is need for the development of improved algorithms that can demonstrate increased performance in online testing, especially in target end-user populations. We have developed an algorithm that uses a Bayesian approach to collect only the amount of data necessary to reach a specified confidence level in the BCI’s decision based on continuous evaluation of the quality of a user’s responses. We further optimized the algorithm by incorporating statistical information about the user’s language. Results from online testing in participants with ALS demonstrate that using the Bayesian dynamic stopping algorithm resulted in a significant reduction in character selection time with minimal effect on accuracy, compared to conventional static data collection. In post-use surveys, the participants overwhelmingly preferred the dynamic stopping algorithms.

[1]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  A novel P300-based brain–computer interface stimulus presentation paradigm: Moving beyond rows and columns , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  Tobias Kaufmann,et al.  Bringing BCI Controlled Devices to End-Users: A User Centred Approach and Evaluation , 2013 .

[3]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  W. A. Sarnacki,et al.  Brain–computer interface (BCI) operation: optimizing information transfer rates , 2003, Biological Psychology.

[5]  A. Lenhardt,et al.  An Adaptive P300-Based Online Brain–Computer Interface , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[6]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Online use of error-related potentials in healthy users and people with severe motor impairment increases performance of a P300-BCI , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  J. Cedarbaum,et al.  The ALSFRS-R: a revised ALS functional rating scale that incorporates assessments of respiratory function , 1999, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[8]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Asynchronous P300-Based Brain--Computer Interfaces: A Computational Approach With Statistical Models , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  Utilizing a Language Model to Improve Online Dynamic Data Collection in P300 Spellers , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  K. A. Colwell,et al.  Bayesian Approach to Dynamically Controlling Data Collection in P300 Spellers , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[11]  Shangkai Gao,et al.  An online brain–computer interface using non-flashing visual evoked potentials , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[12]  Nader Pouratian,et al.  Integrating Language Information With a Hidden Markov Model to Improve Communication Rate in the P300 Speller , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[13]  Maureen Clerc,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces 1 , 2016 .

[14]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  BCIs in the Laboratory and at Home: The Wadsworth Research Program , 2009 .

[15]  E. Donchin,et al.  Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  T. Chau,et al.  A Review of EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces as Access Pathways for Individuals with Severe Disabilities , 2013, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[17]  G.F. Inbar,et al.  An improved P300-based brain-computer interface , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[18]  J. W. Minett,et al.  Optimizing the P300-based brain–computer interface: current status, limitations and future directions , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[19]  Sven P. Heinrich,et al.  Signal and noise in P300 recordings to visual stimuli , 2008, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[20]  Xingyu Wang,et al.  An adaptive P300-based control system , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[21]  F Cincotti,et al.  Current trends in hardware and software for brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[22]  F. Cincotti,et al.  Attention and P300-based BCI performance in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[23]  E. Donchin,et al.  A P300-based brain–computer interface: Initial tests by ALS patients , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  An efficient P300-based brain–computer interface for disabled subjects , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[25]  E. W. Sellers,et al.  Toward enhanced P300 speller performance , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[26]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  Optimizing event-related potential based brain-computer interfaces: a systematic evaluation of dynamic stopping methods. , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[27]  E. John,et al.  Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty , 1965, Science.