The effects of augmented kinematic feedback on motor skill learning in rifle shooting

Abstract In this study, we examined the effects of augmented kinematic knowledge of performance (KP) on shooting performance and learning. Knowledge of performance described the aiming trajectory of the rifle barrel. The effects of knowledge of performance were evaluated in terms of shooting accuracy (shooting score), variability of the shooting score (root mean square error) and rifle stability (x- and y-deviation of rifle movement). The participants (n = 40) were randomly assigned to one of four groups: no-KP, 50% KP, 100% KP and a control group. The three experimental groups performed 480 shots during a 4 week acquisition phase in which feedback was provided. No-feedback retention tests were administered at 2 and 10 days after acquisition. There were no differences between groups during acquisition. In the 2 day retention test, the mean shooting score of the group receiving 100% knowledge of performance was significantly higher than that of the other groups. Furthermore, variability in shooting score for the 100% KP group was lower than that for the 50% KP and control groups. No significant differences were found in rifle stability between the experimental groups. In summary, a high frequency of kinematic knowledge of performance improved shooting accuracy, but the effect appeared to be temporal, disappearing in the 10 day retention test. Given that a parallel effect was not found in rifle stability, future research should focus on examining the reasons for this improvement in shooting score.

[1]  J. Copas,et al.  Using generalized linear models (GLMs) to model errors in motor performance. , 1991, Journal of motor behavior.

[2]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. , 1990 .

[3]  M G Fischman,et al.  Motor skill acquisition and retention as a function of average feedback, summary feedback, and performance variability. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  C. B. Walter,et al.  Kinematic and kinetic parameters as information feedback in motor skill acquisition , 1981 .

[5]  E. Hebert,et al.  Effects of a learning model and augmented feedback on tennis skill acquisition. , 1994, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[6]  R. A. Schmidt,et al.  Reducing Knowledge of Results About Relative Versus Absolute Timing: Differential Effects on Learning. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.

[7]  B. A. Boyce.  The Effects of an Instructional Strategy with Two Schedules of Augmented KP Feedback upon Skill Acquisition of a Selected Shooting Task , 1992 .

[8]  R N Singer,et al.  Subject-controlled performance feedback and learning of a closed motor skill. , 1995, Perceptual and motor skills.

[9]  L. Carlton,et al.  Information feedback and the learning multiple-degree-of-freedom activities. , 1992, Journal of motor behavior.

[10]  R J Bootsma,et al.  The effect of video-feedback on the learning of the tennis service by intermediate players. , 1989, Journal of sports sciences.

[11]  R J Bootsma,et al.  The effect of video-modelling and video-feedback on the learning of the tennis service by novices. , 1985, Journal of sports sciences.

[12]  T A Brisson,et al.  Optimal movement pattern characteristics are not required as a reference for knowledge of performance. , 1996, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[13]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Augmented Kinematic Feedback for Motor Learning. , 1992, Journal of motor behavior.

[14]  Claude Alain,et al.  A Comparison of Two References for Using Knowledge of Performance in Learning a Motor Task. , 1997, Journal of motor behavior.

[15]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Methodology for motor learning: a paradigm for kinematic feedback. , 1991, Journal of motor behavior.

[16]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  C. Shea,et al.  Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  George Tzetzis,et al.  The effect of modeling and verbal feedback on skill learning , 1999 .

[19]  G. Mavromatis,et al.  Goal Setting and Feedback for the Development of Instructional Strategies , 1997, Perceptual and motor skills.

[20]  K. M. Newell,et al.  Augmented information and the acquisition of isometric tasks. , 1987, Journal of motor behavior.

[21]  C. Shea,et al.  Frequent feedback enhances complex motor skill learning. , 1998, Journal of motor behavior.

[22]  Bruce R. Mason,et al.  Biomechanical factors affecting accuracy in pistol shooting , 1989 .

[23]  N. Charness,et al.  Expert Performance Its Structure and Acquisition , 2002 .

[24]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Kinematic information feedback and task constraints , 1987 .

[25]  V M Zatsiorsky,et al.  Biomechanics of highly precise movements: the aiming process in air rifle shooting. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[27]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Average KR degrades parameter learning. , 1996, Journal of motor behavior.

[28]  J. K. Nelson,et al.  Research Methods in Physical Activity , 1990 .

[29]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Variability and Motor Control , 1993 .

[30]  N Konttinen,et al.  Rifle‐balancing in precision shooting:behavioral aspects and psychophysiological implication , 1998, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[31]  D L Weeks,et al.  Relative frequency of knowledge of performance and motor skill learning. , 1998, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.