Cultural-historical activity theory and the zone of proximal development in the study of idioculture design and implementation

For a large part of its history cognitive science has been grounded in views of the mind based on the traditional Cartesian dualisms. These dichotomies have been reinforced in particular by the view of the mind as an encased symbol-processing system ''protected from the external world'' (Newell, A., Rosenbloom, P. S., & Laird J. E. (1990). Symbolic architectures for cognition. In M.I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science, Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press, pp. 93-131:107). Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) seeks to supersede Cartesianism, thinking about cognition and culture as mutually constitutive of each other. This approach analyzes thought processes as embedded in and manifested through systems of historically developing, culturally mediated activity. Consequently for CHAT, a basic unit for the study of human thought is joint mediated activity. In this paper we will discuss an example of research that follows the CHAT approach to the analysis of learning and development. The data sample is taken from a session of the Fifth Dimension, an after-school activity designed to implement CHAT principles in order to promote the cognitive and social development of adult and child participants alike.

[1]  M. Cole.  Cultural psychology: a once and future discipline? , 1996, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[2]  Michael Grüninger,et al.  Introduction , 2002, CACM.

[3]  John E. Laird,et al.  Symbolic architectures for cognition , 1989 .

[4]  T. Ingold.  The perception of the environment : essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill , 2000 .

[5]  C. Geertz.  The interpretation of cultures / Clifford Geertz , 1973 .

[6]  M. Posner.  Foundations of cognitive science , 1989 .

[7]  M. Cole,et al.  Beyond the Individual-Social Antinomy in Discussions of Piaget and Vygotsky , 1996 .

[8]  R. Siegler.  Microgenetic Analyses of Learning , 2007 .

[9]  B. Rogoff,et al.  Children's Learning in the Zone of Proximal Development , 1984 .

[10]  Alexander K. Luria,et al.  Towards the Problem of the Historical Nature of Psychological Processes , 1971 .

[11]  J. Wertsch.  The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology , 1981 .

[12]  Duane Roen,et al.  Richness in Writing: Empowering Esl Students , 1989 .

[13]  Michael Cole,et al.  The Fifth Dimension: An After-School Program Built on Diversity , 2006 .

[14]  L. Vygotsky,et al.  The problem of the cultural development of the child Lev Vygotsky , 2009 .

[15]  E. Hutchins.  Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[16]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[17]  Aleksandr R. Luria,et al.  The Making of Mind , 2003 .

[18]  S. Kraemer.  Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Gregory Bateson , 1993, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[19]  N. Minick,et al.  The Development of Vygotsky’s Thought: An Introduction , 1987 .

[20]  J. Wertsch.  Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind , 1985 .

[21]  L. S. Vygotski.  II. The Problem of the Cultural Development of the Child , 1929 .

[22]  Michael Cole,et al.  Current activity for the future: The Zo‐ped , 1984 .

[23]  A. Inkeles,et al.  International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. , 1968 .

[24]  M. Sahlins.  Culture and Practical Reason , 1979 .

[25]  Olga A. Vásquez,et al.  La Clase Mágica: Imagining Optimal Possibilities in a Bilingual Community of Learners , 2002 .

[26]  Johan F. Hoorn,et al.  Distributed cognition , 2005, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[27]  H. Gardner.  The mind's new science: a history of the cognitive revolution , 1985 .

[28]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Play, learning, and instruction , 1999 .

[29]  Lev Vygotsky.  Mind in society , 1978 .

[30]  L. Vygotsky.  Genesis of the higher mental functions. , 1991 .

[31]  Alekseĭ Nikolaevich Leontʹev.  Problems of the development of the mind , 1981 .