Image quality metrics for the evaluation of print quality

Image quality metrics have become more and more popular in the image processing community. However, so far, no one has been able to define an image quality metric well correlated with the percept for overall image quality. One of the causes is that image quality is multi-dimensional and complex. One approach to bridge the gap between perceived and calculated image quality is to reduce the complexity of image quality, by breaking the overall quality into a set of quality attributes. In our research we have presented a set of quality attributes built on existing attributes from the literature. The six proposed quality attributes are: sharpness, color, lightness, artifacts, contrast, and physical. This set keeps the dimensionality to a minimum. An experiment validated the quality attributes as suitable for image quality evaluation. The process of applying image quality metrics to printed images is not straightforward, because image quality metrics require a digital input. A framework has been developed for this process, which includes scanning the print to get a digital copy, image registration, and the application of image quality metrics. With quality attributes for the evaluation of image quality and a framework for applying image quality metrics, a selection of suitable image quality metrics for the different quality attributes has been carried out. Each of the quality attributes has been investigated, and an experimental analysis carried out to find the most suitable image quality metrics for the given quality attributes. For the sharpness attributes the Structural SIMilarity index (SSIM) by Wang et al. (2004) is the the most suitable, and for the other attributes further evaluation is required.

[1]  Niels Keiding,et al.  Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics, 2: Classical Inference and Relationship. , 1993 .

[2]  Sn Yendrikhovskij,et al.  Color reproduction and the naturalness constraint , 1999 .

[3]  J. Cohen,et al.  Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulas , 1968 .

[4]  Ming-Kai Tse,et al.  A Report on a Subjective Print Quality Survey Conducted at NIP16 , 2001 .

[5]  C. Bouman,et al.  Optimized Error Diffusion for High Quality Image Display , 1992 .

[6]  Franco Oberti,et al.  A new sharpness metric based on local kurtosis, edge and energy information , 2004, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[7]  Jon Y. Hardeberg,et al.  An adaptive Bilateral Filter for Predicting Color Image Difference , 2009, CIC.

[8]  Marianne Klaman,et al.  Adpects on colour rendering, colour prediction and colour control in printed media , 2002 .

[9]  Ahmet M. Eskicioglu,et al.  An SVD-based grayscale image quality measure for local and global assessment , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  Brian W. Keelan,et al.  Preference in Image Quality Modeling , 2002, PICS.

[11]  Peter G. Engeldrum,et al.  Image Quality Modeling: Where Are We? , 1999, PICS.

[12]  Jon Y. Hardeberg,et al.  A New Spatial Hue Angle Metric for Perceptual Image Difference , 2009, CCIW.

[13]  Siv Lindberg.  Perceptual determinants of print quality , 2004 .

[14]  Brian A. Wandell,et al.  A spatial extension of CIELAB for digital color‐image reproduction , 1997 .

[15]  Jon Y. Hardeberg,et al.  Validation of Quality Attributes for Evaluation of Color Prints , 2010, Color Imaging Conference.

[16]  Joni-Kristian Kämäräinen,et al.  Framework for Applying Full Reference Digital Image Quality Measures to Printed Images , 2009, SCIA.

[17]  Jon Y. Hardeberg,et al.  Attributes of a New Image Quality Model for Color Prints , 2009, Color Imaging Conference.

[18]  Kevin J. Madders,et al.  EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY , 1983 .

[19]  Peter G. Engeldrum,et al.  Psychometric Scaling: A Toolkit for Imaging Systems Development , 2000 .

[20]  Masaaki Sato,et al.  Evaluating the Overall Image Quality of Hardcopy Output , 1998, PICS.

[21]  Chengwu Cui,et al.  Measuring Visual Threshold of Inkjet Banding , 2001, PICS.

[22]  Ján Morovic,et al.  Visual Differences In Colour Reproduction And Their Colorimetric Correlates , 2002, Color Imaging Conference.

[23]  Alessandro Rizzi,et al.  Measuring perceptual contrast in a multi-level framework , 2009, Electronic Imaging.

[24]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Spatial Pooling Strategies for Perceptual Image Quality Assessment , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Image Processing.

[25]  Jon Yngve Hardeberg,et al.  Survey of full-reference image quality metrics , 2009 .

[26]  Sheila S. Hemami,et al.  VSNR: A Wavelet-Based Visual Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Natural Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[27]  R. Schettini,et al.  Dynamic range optimization by local contrast correction and histogram image analysis , 2006, 2006 Digest of Technical Papers International Conference on Consumer Electronics.

[28]  Charles A. Bouman,et al.  Optimized universal color palette design for error diffusion , 1995, J. Electronic Imaging.

[29]  Hans Brettel,et al.  Evaluation of Spatial Gamut Mapping Algorithms , 2006, Color Imaging Conference.

[30]  Brian Keelan,et al.  Handbook of Image Quality: Characterization and Prediction , 2002 .

[31]  Zofia Baranczuk,et al.  Saliency Models as Gamut-Mapping Artifact Detectors , 2010, CGIV/MCS.

[32]  Ruud Janssen,et al.  Computational Image Quality , 2001 .

[33]  Carl Staelin,et al.  Automatic visual inspection and defect detection on variable data prints , 2011, J. Electronic Imaging.

[34]  Mikko Nuutinen,et al.  Development and measurement of the goodness of test images for visual print quality evaluation , 2010, Electronic Imaging.

[35]  Giordano B. Beretta,et al.  Web-based versus controlled environment psychophysics experiments , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[36]  Branko Grünbaum,et al.  THE SEARCH FOR SYMMETRIC VENN DIAGRAMS , 1999 .

[37]  Patricia Ladret,et al.  The blur effect: perception and estimation with a new no-reference perceptual blur metric , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[38]  Jon Y. Hardeberg,et al.  Attributes of image quality for color prints , 2010, J. Electronic Imaging.

[39]  Claudio Oleari,et al.  PERFORMANCE OF THE EUCLIDEAN COLOR-DIFFERENCE FORMULA IN LOG-COMPRESSED OSA-UCS SPACE APPLIED TO MODIFIED-IMAGE-DIFFERENCE METRICS , 2009 .

[40]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Translation insensitive image similarity in complex wavelet domain , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[41]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multi-scale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003 .

[42]  M. Kendall,et al.  Kendall's advanced theory of statistics , 1995 .

[43]  Peter Zolliker,et al.  Image Quality Measures for Evaluating Gamut Mapping , 2009, Color Imaging Conference.

[44]  Abhay Sharma,et al.  Measuring the Quality of ICC Profiles and Color-Management Software , 2003 .

[45]  Lei Zhang,et al.  RFSIM: A feature based image quality assessment metric using Riesz transforms , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[46]  C. J. Bartleson,et al.  The Combined Influence of Sharpness and Graininess on the Quality of Colour Prints , 1982 .

[47]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[48]  Andrew G. Tescher,et al.  Very High Resolution and Quality Imaging II , 1997 .

[49]  S. Triantaphillidou,et al.  Predicting image quality using a modular image difference model , 2008, Electronic Imaging.

[50]  Wang Yu,et al.  Color Reproduction Quality Metric on Printing Images Based on the S-CIELAB Model , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering.

[51]  Hannu Saarelma,et al.  Objective quality potential measures of natural color images , 1998 .

[52]  Lindsay W. MacDonald,et al.  Colour Difference Metrics and Image Sharpness , 2000, Color Imaging Conference.

[53]  Brian A. Wandell,et al.  Color image quality metric S-CIELAB and its application on halftone texture visibility , 1997, Proceedings IEEE COMPCON 97. Digest of Papers.

[54]  Brian A. Wandell,et al.  Applications of a spatial extension to CIELAB , 1997, Electronic Imaging.

[55]  Marius Pedersen,et al.  Framework for the Evaluation of Color Prints Using Image Quality Metrics , 2010, CGIV/MCS.

[56]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision , 2001, Vision Research.

[57]  Huib de Ridder,et al.  Perceptual Quality of Color Images of Natural Scenes Transformed in CIELUV Color Space , 1993, Color Imaging Conference.

[58]  Fredrik Nilsson.  Objective quality measures for halftoned images , 1999 .

[59]  Charles A. Bouman,et al.  Optimized error diffusion for image display , 1992, J. Electronic Imaging.

[60]  K Knoblauch,et al.  Effects of chromatic and luminance contrast on reading. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[61]  Gunther Wyszecki,et al.  Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae, 2nd Edition , 2000 .

[62]  Jon Y. Hardeberg,et al.  Rank Order and Image Difference Metrics , 2008, CGIV/MCS.

[63]  G E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading. XI. Comparing color contrast and luminance contrast. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[64]  Jon Yngve Hardeberg,et al.  Evaluating colour image difference metrics for gamut‐mapped images , 2008 .

[65]  Jon Y. Hardeberg,et al.  Estimating Print Quality Attributes by Image Quality Metrics , 2010, Color Imaging Conference.