Assessment of semantic similarity between land use/land cover classification systems

One difficulty in sharing datasets between research projects and research teams is variation in the semantic content of the data expressed as differences in categorization. One step towards achieving semantic interoperability is to have means to measure the degree of semantic similarity between existing datasets and the target categorization of the new study. A variety of environmental and urban analyses use land use/land cover data to describe the natural environment. This paper focuses on measuring semantic similarity between categories in different land use/land cover classification systems. A modified feature-based approach is employed. Semantic components of a category are weighted to emphasize critical features in the categories definition. A case study is presented to demonstrate how semantic similarity is measured between target categories in a specific study and categories already in use in existing land use/land cover classification systems.

[1]  E. H. Hutten SEMANTICS , 1953, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[2]  Barry Smith,et al.  Surrounding space the ontology of organism-environment relations , 2002, Theory in Biosciences.

[3]  Yaser A. Bishr,et al.  Overcoming the Semantic and Other Barriers to GIS Interoperability , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[4]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[5]  Carol Reschke,et al.  Ecological Communities of New York State , 1990 .

[6]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Book Reviews: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database , 1999, CL.

[7]  Ling Bian,et al.  GIS modeling of elk calving habitat in a prairie environment with statistics , 1997 .

[8]  David C. Kuncicky Introduction to Word , 1998 .

[9]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Changing Focus on Interoperability in Information Systems:From System, Syntax, Structure to Semantics , 1999 .

[10]  Michael F. Worboys,et al.  Integrating Spatio-Thematic Information , 2002, GIScience.

[11]  Mike P. Papazoglou,et al.  Cooperative Information Systems: Trends and Directions , 1997 .

[12]  Andrew K. Skidmore,et al.  Land use and land cover , 2002 .

[13]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  Asessing Semnatic Similarities among Geospatial Feature Class Definitions , 1999, INTEROP.

[14]  George A. Miller,et al.  Introduction to WordNet: An On-line Lexical Database , 1990 .

[15]  James R. Anderson,et al.  A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data , 1976 .

[16]  Roy Rada,et al.  Development and application of a metric on semantic nets , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[17]  Werner Kuhn,et al.  Modeling the Semantics of Geographic Categories through Conceptual Integration , 2002, GIScience.