Towards 3D full-waveform inversion of crosshole GPR data

2D crosshole ground penetrating (GPR) full-1 waveform inversion (FWI) has shown superior resolution 1 compared to ray-based inversion tomograms for synthetic and experimental data. To invert measured 3D data with a 2D j model that has a reduced geometrical spreading and assumes infinite source and receiver dimensions perpendicular to the 2D inversion plane, the Bleistein transformation can be used to convert the measured 3D data to 2D. This far-field conversion consists of a phase shift and amplitude correction that is based on the first arrival travel time of each trace. In the case of late arrival and high amplitude events that 1 can occur due to low-velocity waveguides andfast propagating refracted waves, this transformation can introduce errors especially in the amplitude such that the inverted conductivity is less accurate. To overcome these problems, we have replaced the 2D finite difference time domain FDTD forward model in the FWI scheme with the well-known gprMax3D FDTD modeling program. In this way, we do not need to use the Bleistein 3D-to-2D filter with its far-field approximation, and we can deal with the correct geometrical spreading and approximate better realistic point source and receivers. Currently, the 2D FWI algorithm has been extended to 2.5D by replacing the 2D FDTD with the gprMax 3D FDTD modeling program. The first test of the 2.5D FWI is based on inversion results of a data set acquired at the Widen site in Switzerland that contained a low-velocity waveguide. The new 2.5D FWI performed well in reconstructing the models. The new 2.5D FWI enables a more reliable re-construction of the subsurface image, especially the electrical conductivity tomograms and to the full use of all the modeling possibilities of the gprMax modeling tool.

[1]  Hansruedi Maurer,et al.  Taming the non-linearity problem in GPR full-waveform inversion for high contrast media , 2011 .

[2]  Jean Virieux,et al.  An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics , 2009 .

[3]  Ludovic Métivier,et al.  Two-dimensional permittivity and conductivity imaging by full waveform inversion of multioffset GPR data: a frequency-domain quasi-Newton approach , 2014 .

[4]  Jacques R. Ernst,et al.  Application of a new 2D time-domain full-waveform inversion scheme to crosshole radar data , 2007 .

[5]  H. Vereecken,et al.  Crosshole GPR full-waveform inversion and waveguide amplitude analysis: Recent developments and new challenges , 2015, 2015 8th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR).

[6]  Stefano Marelli,et al.  A critical appraisal of asymptotic 3D-to-2D data transformation in full-waveform seismic crosshole tomography , 2013 .

[7]  Niklas Linde,et al.  Full-waveform inversion of cross-hole ground-penetrating radar data to characterize a gravel aquifer close to the Thur River, Switzerland , 2010 .

[8]  Wafik B. Beydoun,et al.  First Born and Rytov approximations: Modeling and inversion conditions in a canonical example , 1988 .

[9]  Niklas Linde,et al.  3-D characterization of high-permeability zones in a gravel aquifer using 2-D crosshole GPR full-waveform inversion and waveguide detection , 2013 .

[10]  J. Virieux,et al.  Three-dimensional to two-dimensional data conversion for electromagnetic wave propagation using an acoustic transfer function: application to cross-hole GPR data , 2014 .

[11]  S. Greenhalgh,et al.  Zonation for 3D aquifer characterization based on joint inversions of multimethod crosshole geophysical data , 2010 .

[12]  N. Bleistein Two-and-One-Half Dimensional In-Plane Wave Propagation. , 1984 .

[13]  Harry Vereecken,et al.  Crosshole GPR full-waveform inversion of waveguides acting as preferential flow paths within aquifer systems , 2012 .

[14]  2D Acoustic Full Waveform Inversion of a Land Seismic Line , 2010 .