Driverless vehicles' potential influence on bicyclist facility preferences

ABSTRACT Research in the field of autonomous vehicle technology focuses on its enhanced safety and convenience for vehicle occupants. The present paper seeks to establish a line of inquiry that addresses the implications of autonomous vehicle technology for nonmotorized road users, in the present case, bicyclists. Studies show that motorized traffic volume and speed affect nonmotorized agents' behavior and facility preference, but the degree to which this will apply to a driverless environment requires further study. We developed a stated-preference survey that had respondents select their preferred facility in a variety of hypothetical scenarios with and without the presence of driverless vehicles and on street types of varying motorized traffic volumes and speeds. A Random Parameters Logit Model is estimated to analyze the links between facility preferences, sociodemographics, street types, and the existence of driverless vehicles. The model results suggest that increases in motorized traffic volumes and speeds correlate with a greater preference for separated facilities. The presence of driverless vehicles amplifies this preference. Controlling for other factors, under driverless vehicle conditions, the odds of selecting protected facilities, such as buffered bicycle lanes and cycle tracks, were more than double the odds found under current conditions. We conclude with recommendations for infrastructure and policy and suggestions for future research in this nascent field of study.

[1]  Sergio R. Jara-Díaz,et al.  Understanding cyclists' perceptions, keys for a successful bicycle promotion , 2014 .

[2]  W. Jeffrey Davis Bicycle Test Route Evaluation for Urban Road Conditions , 1995 .

[3]  Gulsah Akar,et al.  Influence of Individual Perceptions and Bicycle Infrastructure on Decision to Bike , 2009 .

[4]  David A. Mfinanga,et al.  Implication of pedestrians' stated preference of certain attributes of crosswalks , 2014 .

[5]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Factors Affecting Bicycling Demand , 2007 .

[6]  Brian Caulfield,et al.  Determining bicycle infrastructure preferences – A case study of Dublin , 2012 .

[7]  Ralph Buehler,et al.  Making Cycling Irresistible: Lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany , 2008 .

[8]  D. McFadden,et al.  MIXED MNL MODELS FOR DISCRETE RESPONSE , 2000 .

[9]  Jack T Dennerlein,et al.  Risk of injury for bicycling on cycle tracks versus in the street , 2011, Injury Prevention.

[10]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  Analysis of Stated Preferences for Intermodal Bicycle-Transit Interfaces , 1996 .

[11]  K. Krizek,et al.  Gender Differences in Bicycling Behavior and Facility Preferences , 2005 .

[12]  Peter A Cripton,et al.  Route infrastructure and the risk of injuries to bicyclists: a case-crossover study. , 2012, American journal of public health.

[13]  Emilio Moyano Díaz Theory of planned behavior and pedestrians' intentions to violate traffic regulations , 2002 .

[14]  Florian Heiss,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[15]  M. Harris,et al.  The impact of transportation infrastructure on bicycling injuries and crashes: a review of the literature , 2009, Environmental health : a global access science source.

[16]  Jennifer Dill Bicycling for Transportation and Health: The Role of Infrastructure , 2009, Journal of public health policy.

[17]  M. Wardman,et al.  Factors influencing the propensity to cycle to work , 2007 .

[18]  Thomas Walsh,et al.  BICYCLE STRESS LEVEL AS A TOOL TO EVALUATE URBAN AND SUBURBAN BICYCLE COMPATIBILITY , 1994 .

[19]  Hugh McClintock,et al.  Cycle facilities and cyclists' safety : Experience from Greater Nottingham and lessons for future cycling provision , 1996 .

[20]  Jan Garrard,et al.  Revolutions for women : increasing women`s participation in cycling for recreation and transport , 2006 .

[21]  G. Rose,et al.  Promoting transportation cycling for women: the role of bicycle infrastructure. , 2008, Preventive medicine.

[22]  Nicolas Saunier,et al.  Pedestrian preferences with respect to roundabouts -- a video-based stated preference survey. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Evaluating the safety effects of bicycle lanes in New York City. , 2012, American journal of public health.

[24]  Christopher DeGruyter Exploring Bicycle Level of Service in a Route Choice Context , 2003 .

[25]  Carlo Giacomo Prato,et al.  Safety perceptions and reported behavior related to cycling in mixed traffic: A comparison between Brisbane and Copenhagen , 2014 .

[26]  John E Abraham,et al.  Influences on bicycle use , 2007 .

[27]  Adam Astrid Kemperman,et al.  Influences of Built Environment on Walking and Cycling by Latent Segments of Aging Population , 2009 .

[28]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Bicycle Commuting and Facilities in Major U.S. Cities: If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them , 2003 .

[29]  S. Brody,et al.  Cycling and walking: Explaining the spatial distribution of healthy modes of transportation in the United States , 2008 .

[30]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions , 2013 .

[31]  Jessica Schoner,et al.  Differences between Walking and Bicycling over Time: Implications for Performance Management , 2015 .

[32]  C. Bhat,et al.  Frequency of Bicycle Commuting: Internet-Based Survey Analysis , 2004 .

[33]  K. Krizek Two Approaches to Valuing Some of Bicycle Facilities' Presumed Benefits: Propose a session for the 2007 National Planning Conference in the City of Brotherly Love , 2006 .

[34]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Route choice of cyclists in Zurich , 2010 .

[35]  John W. Polak,et al.  Autonomous cars: The tension between occupant experience and intersection capacity , 2015 .

[36]  Mark Wardman,et al.  Evaluating the demand for new cycle facilities , 1996 .

[37]  Gulsah Akar,et al.  Travel Choices and Links to Transportation Demand Management , 2012 .

[38]  A. Cheadle,et al.  Cycling and the Built Environment, a US Perspective , 2005 .

[39]  Jennifer S. Evans-Cowley,et al.  StreetSeen Visual Survey Tool for Determining Factors that Make a Street Attractive for Bicycling , 2014 .

[40]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  An analysis of bicycle route choice preferences in Texas, US , 2009 .

[41]  I. M. Bernhoft,et al.  Preferences and behaviour of pedestrians and cyclists by age and gender , 2008 .

[42]  D. Levinson,et al.  TRAILS, LANES, OR TRAFFIC: VALUING BICYCLE FACILITIES WITH AN ADAPTIVE STATED PREFERENCE SURVEY , 2007 .

[43]  Gulsah Akar,et al.  Bicycling Choice and Gender Case Study: The Ohio State University , 2013 .

[44]  D. Ragland,et al.  Bicycle commuting market analysis using attitudinal market segmentation approach , 2013 .