Cone spacing and waveguide properties from cone directionality measurements.

Reflectometric techniques estimate the directionality of the retinal cones by measuring the distribution of light at the pupil plane of light reflected off the bleached retina. The waveguide-scattering model of Marcos et al. [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 2012 (1998)] predicts that the shape of this intensity distribution is determined by both the waveguide properties of the cone photoreceptors and the topography of the cone mosaic (cone spacing). We have performed two types of cone directionality measurement. In the first type, cone directionality estimates are obtained by measuring the spatial distribution of light returning from the retina with a single-entry pupil position (single-entry measurements). In the second type, estimates are obtained by measuring the total amount of light guided back through the pupil as a function of entry pupil position (multiple-entry measurements). As predicted by the model, single-entry measurements provide narrower distributions than the multiple-entry measurements, since the former are affected by both waveguides and scattering and the latter are affected primarily by waveguides. Measurements at different retinal eccentricities and at two different wavelengths are consistent with the model. We show that the broader multiple-entry measurements are not accounted for by cone disarray. Results of multiple-entry measurements are closer to results from measurements of the psychophysical Stiles-Crawford effect (although still narrower), and the variation with retinal eccentricity and wavelength is similar. By combining single- and multiple-entry measurements, we can estimate cone spacing. The estimates at 0- and 2-deg retinal eccentricities are in good agreement with published anatomical data.

[1]  W. Stiles,et al.  Luminous Efficiency of Rays entering the Eye Pupil at Different Points , 1937, Nature.

[2]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Photoreceptor misalignment accompanying a fibrous scar. , 1979, Archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  A. Snyder,et al.  The Stiles-Crawford effect--explanation and consequences. , 1973, Vision research.

[4]  Aran Safir,et al.  Distribution of cone orientations as an explanation of the Stiles-Crawford effect. , 1969, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[5]  A Taflove,et al.  Electrodynamics of visible-light interactions with the vertebrate retinal rod. , 1993, Optics letters.

[6]  G. V. van Blokland,et al.  Directionality and alignment of the foveal receptors, assessed with light scattered from the human fundus in vivo. , 1986, Vision research.

[7]  D. Birch,et al.  Functional analysis of vision in patients after retinal detachment repair. , 1980, Archives of ophthalmology.

[8]  G. Westheimer Dependence of the magnitude of the Stiles—Crawford effect on retinal location , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  J. Enoch Optical Properties of the Retinal Receptors , 1963 .

[10]  R A Applegate,et al.  Parametric representation of Stiles-Crawford functions: normal variation of peak location and directionality. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[11]  A. Elsner,et al.  Variations in photoreceptor directionally across the central retina. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[12]  G. M. Morris,et al.  Images of cone photoreceptors in the living human eye , 1996, Vision Research.

[13]  S A Burns,et al.  Direct measurement of human-cone-photoreceptor alignment. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[14]  D. G. Green,et al.  Visual resolution when light enters the eye through different parts of the pupil , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  P Artal,et al.  Coherent imaging of the cone mosaic in the living human eye. , 1996, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[16]  S A Burns,et al.  Model for cone directionality reflectometric measurements based on scattering. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[17]  D. Macleod,et al.  Directionally selective light adaptation: a visual consequence of receptor disarray? , 1974, Vision research.

[18]  F. Fankhauser,et al.  Receptor orientation in retinal pathology. A first study. , 1961, American journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  Light capture by human cones. , 1989, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  F. Delori,et al.  A reflectometric technique for assessing photorecelptor alignment , 1995, Vision Research.

[21]  D. Norren,et al.  Local photoreceptor alignment measured with a scanning laser ophthalmoscope , 1997, Vision Research.

[22]  P. Beckmann,et al.  The scattering of electromagnetic waves from rough surfaces , 1963 .

[23]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Color matching and Stiles-Crawford effect in central serous choroidopathy. , 1978, Modern problems in ophthalmology.

[24]  G. M. Hope,et al.  Directional sensitivity of the foveal and parafoveal retina. , 1973, Investigative ophthalmology.

[25]  G. Blokland,et al.  Directionality and alignment of the foveal receptors, assessed with light scattered from the human fundusin vivo , 1986, Vision Research.

[26]  J. J. Vos,et al.  A clinical Stiles-Crawford apparatus. , 1962, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[27]  J. E. Bailey,et al.  Flicker Effects of Receptor Directional Sensitivity , 1978, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[28]  F. Delori,et al.  A model for assessment of cone directionality , 1997 .

[29]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Human photoreceptor topography , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.