Evidence for the use of robotically assisted surgery in gynecologic cancers

Purpose of review Robotically assisted laparoscopy has been introduced in the armamentarium of gynaecologic oncology surgeons. A lot of studies compared robotic surgery and laparotomy when the real issue is to demonstrate the interest and added value of robotically assisted laparoscopy versus standard laparoscopy. In this review, we will describe the most meaningful indications and advantages of robotically assisted laparoscopy in gynaecologic oncology. Recent findings The learning curve for advanced procedures in robot-assisted laparoscopy is shorter and easier than with the standard laparoscopy, especially for beginners. In most of the series, operating time is longer with robot, but complication rates are often decreased, especially in obese patients with a conversion rate to laparotomy that is decreased compared with standard laparoscopy. Robot-assisted laparoscopy can be used for surgery of high-risk endometrial cancer, staging of early-ovarian cancer, and pelvic exenteration in case of recurrent malignancies. Furthermore, more recent robots allow performing sentinel node biopsy in endometrial or cervical cancer using fluorescence detection with indocyanine green. Summary The spreading of robotic surgery led to an enhancement of minimal invasive surgical approach in general, and to the development of new indications in gynaecologic oncology. The superiority of robot-assisted laparoscopy still has to be demonstrated with properly designed trials.

[1]  Morgan Rouprêt,et al.  Outcomes of a virtual‐reality simulator‐training programme on basic surgical skills in robot‐assisted laparoscopic surgery , 2017, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[2]  G. Scambia,et al.  Robotic Total Mesometrial Resection versus Laparoscopic Total Mesometrial Resection in Early Cervical Cancer: A Case-Control Study. , 2016, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[3]  P. Paley,et al.  A prospective investigation of fluorescence imaging to detect sentinel lymph nodes at robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging. , 2016, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  A. Weaver,et al.  Incorporating robotic-assisted surgery for endometrial cancer staging: Analysis of morbidity and costs. , 2016, Gynecologic oncology.

[5]  F. Heim,et al.  Learning Curve of Robotic-Assisted Anastomosis: Shorter than the Laparoscopic Technique? An Educational Study. , 2016, Annals of vascular surgery.

[6]  M. Rettenmaier,et al.  Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A five year experience. , 2016, Surgical oncology.

[7]  Lin Zhao,et al.  Robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a meta‐analysis , 2016, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[8]  C. Iavazzo,et al.  Robotic assisted hysterectomy in obese patients: a systematic review , 2016, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[9]  A. Bats,et al.  Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Colpectomy and Intracorporeal Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion (Bricker) for Cervical Adenocarcinoma Recurrence , 2015, Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  J. Chan,et al.  Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery in morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients - a comparative analysis of total charges and complication rates. , 2015, Gynecologic oncology.

[11]  G. Chong,et al.  Comparative Study Between Total Laparoscopic and Total Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Carcinoma: Clinical Study. , 2015, Anticancer research.

[12]  D. Cohn,et al.  Robotic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer in Obese Patients With Comorbidities: Evaluating Postoperative Complications , 2015, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[13]  M. Murad,et al.  Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, Gynecologic oncology.

[14]  I. Sperduti,et al.  Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer. , 2015, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[15]  F. Guyon,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy in Gynecologic Oncologic Indications , 2015, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[16]  M. Goodheart,et al.  Robotic surgery in supermorbidly obese patients with endometrial cancer. , 2015, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  Syed Omar Hassan,et al.  Conventional Laparoscopic vs Robotic Training: Which is Better for Naive Users? A Randomized Prospective Crossover Study. , 2015, Journal of surgical education.

[18]  Omar Touhami,et al.  Sentinel node mapping with indocyanine green and endoscopic near-infrared fluorescence imaging in endometrial cancer. A pilot study and review of the literature. , 2015, Gynecologic oncology.

[19]  N. Fleming,et al.  Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies. , 2015, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  T. Manchana,et al.  Comparison of Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes with Laparotomy, and Laparoscopic or Robotic Surgery for Women with Endometrial Cancer. , 2015, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[21]  N. Kim,et al.  Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves , 2015, Surgical Endoscopy.

[22]  N. Kim,et al.  Is the Learning Curve of Robotic Low Anterior Resection Shorter Than Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer? , 2014, Medicine.

[23]  Fangzhou Song,et al.  Comparison of Robotic Surgery with Laparoscopy and Laparotomy for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: A Meta-Analysis , 2014, PloS one.

[24]  J. Sheeder,et al.  Comparative Outcomes in Older and Younger Women Undergoing Laparotomy or Robotic Surgical Staging for Endometrial Cancer , 2014 .

[25]  S. Puntambekar,et al.  Initial experience of robotic anterior pelvic exenteration at a single institute , 2014, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[26]  R. Barakat,et al.  The feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after robotic-assisted hysterectomy alone or with other procedures for benign and malignant indications. , 2014, Gynecologic oncology.

[27]  T. Grantcharov,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of laparoscopic surgery training , 2014, Surgical Endoscopy.

[28]  A. Bats,et al.  Laparoscopy vs robotics in surgical management of endometrial cancer: comparison of intraoperative and postoperative complications. , 2014, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[29]  L. Hedman,et al.  Visuospatial ability correlates with performance in simulated gynecological laparoscopy. , 2011, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[30]  S. Lau,et al.  Relationship Between Body Mass Index and Robotic Surgery Outcomes of Women Diagnosed With Endometrial Cancer , 2011, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[31]  J. Thigpen Laparoscopy Compared With Laparotomy for Comprehensive Surgical Staging of Uterine Cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2 , 2010 .

[32]  L. Mettler,et al.  The value of laparoscopic surgery to stage gynecological cancers: present and future. , 2009, Minerva ginecologica.

[33]  G. Chong,et al.  Learning Curve of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy With Pelvic and/or Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy in the Early and Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Comparison of the First 50 and Second 50 Cases , 2009, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[34]  P. Ramirez Robotic radical hysterectomy: a new standard of care? , 2009, Future oncology.

[35]  D. Querleu,et al.  Impact of initial surgical access on staging and survival of patients with stage I ovarian cancer , 2004, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[36]  D. Querleu,et al.  Laparoscopic restaging of early stage invasive adnexal tumors: a 10-year experience. , 2004, Gynecologic oncology.

[37]  Teodor P Grantcharov,et al.  Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills. , 2003, American journal of surgery.