Modified average local variance for pixel-level scale selection of multiband remote sensing images and its scale effect on image classification accuracy

Abstract The development of remote sensor technology makes it convenient to obtain multiscale satellite data sets, but selecting data with an appropriate scale has become a problem. We propose improvements based on modified average local variance (MALV) for selecting the optimal spatial resolution of multiband images. One improvement is computing the mean MALVs of all bands, and the other is computing the average MALV of the selected bands. We discuss the optimum index factor and principal component analysis (PCA) methods for band selection. Further image classification experiments with different spatial resolutions are employed to verify the proposed methods. The experimental results prove that the MALV method is suitable for images with simplex landscape type. When the spatial extent of the image data is large, the MALV of the subimage whose landscape type is similar to the dominating landscape of the whole image is significantly referential for selecting the optimal spatial resolution. MALV based on PCA is more effective for reflecting the scale effect of spatial resolution and thus is useful for selecting the optimal spatial resolution of a multiband image. The experimental results also prove that very high spatial resolution will lead to high heterogeneity within class, and thus it will lead to low separability and low classification accuracy. Furthermore, the MALV method provides a feasible approach for quantitative research of the modifiable area unit problem.

[1]  Anne Puissant,et al.  Optimizing Spatial Resolution of Imagery for Urban Form Detection - The Cases of France and Vietnam , 2011, Remote. Sens..

[2]  Farah Torkamani-Azar,et al.  Band selection of hyperspectral-image based weighted indipendent component analysis , 2010 .

[3]  Dongmei Chen,et al.  Examining the effect of spatial resolution and texture window size on classification accuracy: an urban environment case , 2004 .

[4]  P. K. Bocher,et al.  The fundamentals of average local Variance-part II: sampling simple regular patterns with optical imagery , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  Stan Openshaw,et al.  Modifiable Areal Unit Problem , 2008, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[6]  Su Wang,et al.  Linearly constrained band selection for hyperspectral imagery , 2006, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[7]  Marvin E. Bauer,et al.  Effects of satellite image spatial aggregation and resolution on estimates of forest land area , 2009 .

[8]  S. M. Jong,et al.  Optimizing spatial image support for quantitative mapping of natural vegetation , 2009 .

[9]  Wesley E. Snyder,et al.  Band selection using independent component analysis for hyperspectral image processing , 2003, 32nd Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop, 2003. Proceedings..

[10]  Yuan Hui,et al.  Band selection of hyperspectral images based on Bhattacharyya distance , 2009 .

[11]  Jianyu Yang,et al.  Modified ALV for selecting the optimal spatial resolution and its scale effect on image classification accuracy , 2011, Math. Comput. Model..

[12]  P. Groves,et al.  Methodology For Hyperspectral Band Selection , 2004 .

[13]  H. Hyppänen,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation and optimal spatial resolution of optical remote sensing data in boreal forest environment , 1996 .

[14]  J. Townshend,et al.  Land cover classification accuracy as a function of sensor spatial resolution , 1981 .

[15]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Choosing an appropriate spatial resolution for remote sensing investigations , 1997 .

[16]  Ottawa Kia Oy On Statistical Band Selection for Image Visualization , 2001 .

[17]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Issues of scale and optimal pixel size , 1999 .

[18]  D. Stow,et al.  THE EFFECT OF TRAINING STRATEGIES ON SUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION AT DIFFERENT SPATIAL RESOLUTIONS , 2002 .

[19]  Masanobu Kaneko,et al.  Land cover of oases and forest in XinJiang, China retrieved from ASTER data , 2007 .

[20]  H. T. Basavarajappa,et al.  Application of Optimum Index Factor Technique to Landsat-7 Data for Geological Mapping of North East of Hajjah, Yemen , 2008 .

[21]  Ko B. Fung,et al.  On Statistical Band Selection for Image Visualization , 2001 .

[22]  Majeed M. Hayat,et al.  Optimized algorithm for spectral band selection for rock-type classification , 2005 .

[23]  Eric D. Kolaczyk,et al.  On the choice of spatial and categorical scale in remote sensing land cover classification , 2005 .

[24]  P. Curran The semivariogram in remote sensing: An introduction , 1988 .

[25]  David W. S. Wong The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP) , 2004 .

[26]  P. K. Bocher,et al.  The fundamentals of average local variance - part I: detecting regular patterns , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[27]  Cheng Liang Selection of optimal scale in remotely sensed image classification , 2010 .

[28]  P. Chavez,et al.  STATISTICAL METHOD FOR SELECTING LANDSAT MSS RATIOS , 1982 .

[29]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Defining an optimal size of support for remote sensing investigations , 1995, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[30]  Luis O. Jimenez-Rodriguez,et al.  Unsupervised feature extraction and band subset selection techniques based on relative entropy criteria for hyperspectral data analysis , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[31]  C. Woodcock,et al.  The factor of scale in remote sensing , 1987 .

[32]  G. Hay,et al.  Remote Sensing Contributions to the Scale Issue , 1999 .

[33]  Jiancheng Luo,et al.  Modified local variance based method for selecting the optimal spatial resolution of remote sensing image , 2010, 2010 18th International Conference on Geoinformatics.