ANALYTICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL SEISMIC ASSESSMENT OF IRREGULAR RC BUILDINGS

Seismic assessments of irregular buildings need special attention while regular structures can be readily idealized and assessed using 2D conventional methods. In this paper, an advanced analytical assessment methodology for irregular buildings is presented. In the proposed method, 3D modeling is utilized to capture the torsional and bi-directional response of the irregular buildings. A layering technique, termed Planar Decomposition, is proposed and shown to furnish detailed information on the demand and capacity of critical members. As an application, an irregular 3D structure intended for a full-scale experimental testing at the Joint Research Center, Ispra, Italy under the auspices of the EU project Seismic Performance Assessment and Rehabilitation (SPEAR) is assessed using the advanced methodology. Through its application to the test structure and comparison to the conventional methods, it is shown that normal assessment procedures may be inaccurate and even unconservative, in terms of the performance assessment of irregular buildings. This highlights the importance of monitoring the damage state on a member-by-member basis instead of a story or structure level as well as the significance of including torsional effect in the assessment procedure.

[1]  Edmondo DiPasquale,et al.  Relation between Global Damage Indices and Local Stiffness Degradation , 1990 .

[2]  Rita Bento,et al.  METHODOLOGY FOR THE PROBABILISTIC ASSESSMENT OF q FACTORS. A DAMAGE INDEX APPROACH , 2000 .

[3]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  Analytical Modeling of Inelastic Seismic Response of R/C Structures , 1990 .

[4]  Christian Meyer,et al.  Reliability of Concrete Frames Damaged by Earthquakes , 1987 .

[5]  Edmondo DiPasquale,et al.  Detection of Seismic Structural Damage , 1989 .

[6]  Young Soo Chung,et al.  AUTOMATIC SEISMIC DESIGN OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING FRAMES , 1990 .

[7]  A. Ang,et al.  Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete , 1985 .

[8]  Y J Park,et al.  DAMAGE LIMITING A SEISMIC DESIGN OF BUILDINGS , 1987 .

[9]  Ahmed Ghobarah,et al.  Response‐based damage assessment of structures , 1999 .

[10]  Martin S. Williams,et al.  Seismic Damage Indices for Concrete Structures: A State-of-the-Art Review , 1995 .

[11]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  DETERMINISTIC MODEL FOR SEISMIC DAMAGE EVALUATION OF REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES. TECHNICAL REPORT , 1989 .

[13]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  IDARC Version 3.0: A Program for the Inelastic Damage Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures , 1992 .

[14]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Analytical Assessment of an Irregular RD Full Scale 3D Test Structure , 2004 .

[15]  Paolo NEGRO,et al.  FULL-SCALE PSD TESTING OF A TORSIONALLY UNBALANCED THREE-STOREY NON-SEISMIC RC FRAME , 2002 .

[16]  F. Colangelo EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF MEMBER-BY-MEMBER MODELS AND DAMAGE INDICES FOR INFILLED FRAMES , 2003 .

[17]  A. Çakmak,et al.  Detection and Assessment of Seismic Structural Damage , 1987 .